Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...
Moderator: PoFo Europe Mods
skinster wrote:Habibti @Tainari88
Atlantis wrote:I think Corbyn's speech at the party conference wasn't bad at all. He said all the right things. With all the things he is promising, he is in full election campaign mode. The only downside is that there is no way to finance his election promises. I don't know if that is off-putting to voters in the UK or if that is expected of campaigners.
Still, let's not forget that Johnson is best when campaigning.
Presvias wrote:The whole lie about "having to have" a surplus is a myth.
Rich wrote:Actually I would be content with the ending of "The oath of allegiance" and a statement in the manifesto condemning Monarchical privilege but accepting there is insufficient support for abolition at the monarchy for the foreseeable future.
Why do I not make this demand of the Conservatives, Lib-Dems, DUP or Scottish Nationalists, because they are open establishment parties. UKIP, the Brexit Party and Corbyn's labour party claim to be radical anti elitist privilege parties. Hence condemnation of the monarchy and ending of the vote of allegiance for those parties is non negotiable
Presvias wrote:IMHO both extremes are pointless. It's best to maximise spending with maybe a bit of headroom, as was the case in roughly 2001/2 in this country.
Wtf is the point in having loads of surplus cash when OAPs are freezing to death in their own homes (which is what happened in the early-mid 90s and it's made a comeback since 2010).
B0ycey wrote:Just to clarify a point. The aim of a government isn't to create a surplus it is to balance the books (not increase the deficit)
Sure you can borrow to invest occasionally but what use is over borrowing to solve a non profitable problem today that will most definitely return and be worse in the future because you borrowed yesteryear? And unfortunately that is why capitalism is on borrowed time. QE cannot work everytime and no government ever plans on creating a surplus and always promises pledges they cannot afford. If you want the perks you need to decide what you are willing to sacrifice for it. Be it in taxes or other services.
Mock Swinson if you like, but at least your country isn't going bust with her in charge.
SolarCross wrote:Parliament would not have authority without the oath of allegience. They would just be a bunch of blowhards whom anyone with any self respect will simply ignore including the army and police.
Katie Pavlich Ties ABC’s Epstein Cover-up To C[…]
Recalling Dante and his spiritual understanding, […]
@SueDeNîmes , Well, I'm pretty sure that everyone[…]
Never said they were, but you know that. Yeah, […]