KurtFF8 wrote:What I'm saying is that one of the two sources you posted is literally a state sponsored propaganda outlet and the other is a discredited right wing figure.
One can oppose the West's proxy war against Russia while also not promoting discredited nonsensical sources like the two you've promoted here.
The way you're responding here is to conflate my critique of your sourcing and the point you're trying to make by posting the sources. So let's be clear: I do not support the West's support for Ukraine in this conflict.
You seem to have lost the plot here, Kurt...
The Candace Owens link shows raw footage - the sort of footage that is seen on Twitter and Telegram channels the world over. The fact that she shares it is a credit to her, and the fact that it is not commonly shown by major media further shows how unreliable Western sources are...
Obviously, Russian or various other sources can be completely biased, but at this point, the Ghost of Kyiv touting MSM should be treated quite similar to how RT is treated.
So what is a "good source?!"
Obviously, there's guys like Glenn Greenwald that provide in-depth analysis and seem to provide some pretty objective takes on the given information while cautioning against speculating too much... but there's no point in ennumerating all the individual journalists that we think do a good job...
It's just so much easier to stop a bullshit game of "Oh Candace is DISCREDITED, Russian sauce bad..! Why do this?! Don't you know you can argue agaisnt empire with only GOOD SAUCES?!"
It's borderline concern trolling and it's just so much easier to say "Oh wow, appears Candy Ownes is right here..."