Polish meat controversy-media reveal Russian provocation

Reply

#1056271

By Shade2 - 26 Nov 2006 23:19

- 26 Nov 2006 23:19 #1056271

Sorry I forgot to inform you that Shade2 also thinks that Germany has (and always had) Nazi government and ambitions of invading and enslaving Poland!

Yawn.Obviously you never read what I wrote. That is not what I was writing all along.

I made a mistake - Poland is a grown up girl already, it doesn't need mom and dad to help it go to school.)

I see that my humble persona excites your imagination somehow...

Grown girl, excites,imagination, lolitas. Are you sure the keywords you typed in google have guided you to the right forum ?

In the Eurasianists’ view, it was Tatars – to be precise, the Mongols of the 13th century – who laid the foundation of Russian statehood, culture, and, to some degree, even ethnicity.

#1056282

By Lost Angel - 26 Nov 2006 23:24

- 26 Nov 2006 23:24 #1056282

Sorry I forgot to inform you that Shade2 also thinks that Germany has (and always had) Nazi government and ambitions of invading and enslaving Poland!

But of course, just like any other country, Poland is #1 enemy of them all after all ,)

Grown girl, excites,imagination, lolitas. Are you sure the keywords you typed in google have guided you to the right forum ?

Something bothering you? Want to talk about it? ,)

That Khan Putin, taking a break from his busy daily schedule of plotting world domination in general and the destruction of Poland in particular, decided to defame Polish meat for no good reason, and in order to do so hired a guy that couldn't write in Polish if his life depended on him.

Yes, of course, that is what we should assume, no other way around it. But the Poles won't bend to such petty tricks! Only thing left to wonder is where did they find a person capable of overcoming the hatred for Poland enough to poorly even learn its language?

That one can detect the difference in printed documents written by someone who uses the Latin and Cyrillic alphabet on a daily basis. I mean, what, did this guy confuse N and H? Or something?

He confused his honor ,)

#1056295

By Shade2 - 26 Nov 2006 23:31

- 26 Nov 2006 23:31 #1056295

That one can detect the difference in printed documents written by someone who uses the Latin and Cyrillic alphabet on a daily basis. I mean, what, did this guy confuse N and H? Or something?

Russianisms(rusycyzmy)-Polish words as they are written and spoken by Russians who make certain special errors due to their usage of Russian-which influences their view of how the word should be written down or accented. Also complete lack of Polish diactrics.

, decided to defame Polish meat for no good reason, and in order to do so hired a guy that couldn't write in Polish if his life depended on it.

Russian special services did that, as the recent murder proves they are losing their skill.

In the Eurasianists’ view, it was Tatars – to be precise, the Mongols of the 13th century – who laid the foundation of Russian statehood, culture, and, to some degree, even ethnicity.

#1056307

By Theodore - 26 Nov 2006 23:39

- 26 Nov 2006 23:39 #1056307

The lack of diacritics could be the result of the equipment used - was this supposed to have been issued in Warsaw or somewhere on the periphery?

Also, if there are no diacritics how can you tell the accent?

And I doubt the FSB don't have a Pole or two they could've used.

#1056320

By Shade2 - 26 Nov 2006 23:46

- 26 Nov 2006 23:46 #1056320

Also, if there are no diacritics how can you tell the accent?

Oh you can distinguish Russian accent from Polish one without diactrics-the endings of words are accented for example by double ii which makes the effect known as "zaciągać się" and makes the words sound as Russian spoke them.

And I doubt the FSB don't have a Pole or two they could've used.

Soviets never trusted Poles. I doubt Russia does.

In the Eurasianists’ view, it was Tatars – to be precise, the Mongols of the 13th century – who laid the foundation of Russian statehood, culture, and, to some degree, even ethnicity.

#1056351

By Minsk - 27 Nov 2006 00:10

- 27 Nov 2006 00:10 #1056351

The less we trade with Russia the better as Russia uses trade as weapon.Polish trade with Russia isn't much-circa 3%, less then with Czech Republic(with whom we trade more).

Ah yes so try switching Russian goods with the vastly superior Czech goods. :roll:

Most of history Germany was an ally of Russia against Poland.For example in the time period 1939-1941.

And in all cases an ally of mere convenience. The Polish Partitions were by Russia and Prussia, who then became wary of the activities in the other's ex-Polish lands.

Are you joking ? What is the source of this absurd information ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kwasniewski

"Our purpose is to disarm the Americans and let them fall asleep." MIKHAIL GORBACHEV, on Glasnost

#1056364

By Shade2 - 27 Nov 2006 00:16

- 27 Nov 2006 00:16 #1056364

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kwasniewski

You use wikipedia as source of your knowledge ? No more questions needed...
Btw there is nothing there about Russia, and you realise it was Kwasniewski who supported Orange Revolution in Ukraine, Nato membership for Poland and Baltic states etc ?

Ah yes so try switching Russian goods with the vastly superior Czech goods. Roll eyes

We don't buy anything high-tech from Russia-just gas and oil.
In exports we are completely independent from you-only 3% of exports are going to Russia.
You want more sources, numbers confirming this ?

In the Eurasianists’ view, it was Tatars – to be precise, the Mongols of the 13th century – who laid the foundation of Russian statehood, culture, and, to some degree, even ethnicity.

#1056384

By Minsk - 27 Nov 2006 00:27

- 27 Nov 2006 00:27 #1056384

Nato membership for Poland and Baltic states etc ?

Oh yes I do realise that. Yeltsin was "testing the waters." He was a very different leader than Putin. :knife:

We don't buy anything high-tech from Russia-just gas and oil.

Don't give me that. you get some manufactured items from Russia. And natural gas and oil, of which Russia is the no. 1 producer in the world of both (need i remind you?) are rather important, are they not?

"Our purpose is to disarm the Americans and let them fall asleep." MIKHAIL GORBACHEV, on Glasnost

#1056387

By Minsk - 27 Nov 2006 00:29

- 27 Nov 2006 00:29 #1056387

You want more sources, numbers confirming this ?

No thanks, wikipedia backs you up.

"Our purpose is to disarm the Americans and let them fall asleep." MIKHAIL GORBACHEV, on Glasnost

#1056389

By Shade2 - 27 Nov 2006 00:30

- 27 Nov 2006 00:30 #1056389

Don't give me that. you get some manufactured items from Russia.

Like what ?
Besides long-term contracts from Soviet occupation period for certain machinery and weapons I doubt we receive anything else from Russian. If you now about anything let me know.
Sorry to dissapoint you, but if not for oil and gas, we would likely import 0% of products from Russia.

And natural gas and oil, of which Russia is the no. 1 producer in the world of both (need i remind you?) are rather important, are they not?

Of course, Sudan and Nigeria know this also.

In the Eurasianists’ view, it was Tatars – to be precise, the Mongols of the 13th century – who laid the foundation of Russian statehood, culture, and, to some degree, even ethnicity.

#1056403

By Minsk - 27 Nov 2006 00:37

- 27 Nov 2006 00:37 #1056403

So do the Maldives and Peru. So I assume you get the general point?

"Our purpose is to disarm the Americans and let them fall asleep." MIKHAIL GORBACHEV, on Glasnost

#1056408

By Shade2 - 27 Nov 2006 00:39

- 27 Nov 2006 00:39 #1056408

So do the Maldives and Peru.

Oh I choose Nigeria and Sudan because they base their economies on similiar pattern as Russia-sale of natural resources.

In the Eurasianists’ view, it was Tatars – to be precise, the Mongols of the 13th century – who laid the foundation of Russian statehood, culture, and, to some degree, even ethnicity.

#1056438

By Minsk - 27 Nov 2006 00:57

- 27 Nov 2006 00:57 #1056438

Oh I choose Nigeria and Sudan because they base their economies on similiar pattern as Russia-sale of natural resources.

ah i see then.

"Our purpose is to disarm the Americans and let them fall asleep." MIKHAIL GORBACHEV, on Glasnost

#1056443

By Kiroff - 27 Nov 2006 01:01

- 27 Nov 2006 01:01 #1056443

Uh... So do the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait?

When you crush them, it's only powder. You can't crush us, we're made of steel.

#1056445

By Shade2 - 27 Nov 2006 01:03

- 27 Nov 2006 01:03 #1056445

So do the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait?

Yes not exactly the role models for succesfully functioning states

In the Eurasianists’ view, it was Tatars – to be precise, the Mongols of the 13th century – who laid the foundation of Russian statehood, culture, and, to some degree, even ethnicity.

#1056454

By Lost Angel - 27 Nov 2006 01:06

- 27 Nov 2006 01:06 #1056454

Yes not exactly the role models for succesfully functioning states

I take it you've never been there .)

#1056477

By Shade2 - 27 Nov 2006 01:21

- 27 Nov 2006 01:21 #1056477

I take it you've never been there

Have you ever heard of black curse ?

In the Eurasianists’ view, it was Tatars – to be precise, the Mongols of the 13th century – who laid the foundation of Russian statehood, culture, and, to some degree, even ethnicity.

#1056481

By Lost Angel - 27 Nov 2006 01:25

- 27 Nov 2006 01:25 #1056481

Have you ever heard of black curse ?

"I don't listen to hip-hop" (some dud from southpark)

#1056486

By Shade2 - 27 Nov 2006 01:33

- 27 Nov 2006 01:33 #1056486

"I don't listen to hip-hop" (some dud from southpark)

If you would be educated(which obviously you aren't) you would know it is a economic term for certain economical and political condition countries relaying oil exports face.

In the Eurasianists’ view, it was Tatars – to be precise, the Mongols of the 13th century – who laid the foundation of Russian statehood, culture, and, to some degree, even ethnicity.

#1056489

By Kiroff - 27 Nov 2006 01:37

- 27 Nov 2006 01:37 #1056489

Ah, I know what you mean - in Russia they call it Holland Syndrome. The government prospers from the export of oil while the citizens get poorer. Coined in the 60's when Holland encountered that problem. Though I think United Arab Emirates overcame that problem.

When you crush them, it's only powder. You can't crush us, we're made of steel.

Reply

Page 2 of 3
48 posts

1
2
3