I can competently JUDGE that unwed mothers, as a whole, are not the BEST of parents for children.
Can you do the same?
Unwed mothers is it? Are you still at that?
But what is your opinion of all the Liberal television that never frowns upon these unwed mothers that run around inviting strange men into their bedrooms while Jr sleeps in the next room?
Liberal television? I don't think so. Television programs are made to sell stuff. Whatever the advertisers buy is what commands the money. The more popular a program is the more money the producers can command from the networks who in turn command money from the advertisers.
Yours is a commonly held misconception. Here is (overly simplified version) how it works:
A producer gets an idea for a show. They work up the idea and pitch it to studio executives. These include the programming folks and the marketing folks. If the studio executives (businessmen in suits) think the show will sell they will order a pilot program or a short run. Armed with this they will approach advertisers with the product.
So if you want to know who is actually pulling the strings it is not “liberals” it is businessmen. Look at the great liberal show “The Daily Show.” Who is pulling the strings? Well first you have Sumner Redstone. He owns majority interest in Viacom. Is he a liberal? Let’s see:
Redstone attended the prestigious Boston Latin School, where he graduated first in his class. He then attended Harvard College, where he completed his B.A. in three years. Later, Redstone served in World War II, serving with the team that decoded Japanese messages for the United States Army.[4] Upon completion of his Army service, he worked in Washington, D.C. and attended Georgetown University Law School. He transferred into Harvard Law School and received his LL.B., later amended to a Juris Doctor, from that institution.
After completing law school, Redstone worked for the U.S. Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. and San Francisco, and then went into private practice. After a few years in practice, he joined his father's theater chain.
Doesn’t sound like a liberal to me.
Maybe it is the advertisers that are driving the train. Yes? One of the largest advertisers is A T & T Do liberals mange A T& T? I think not. The CEO of ATT is Randall L. Stephens. Is he a liberal? Lets see:
Randall Lynn Stephenson, Jr. (born 22 April 1960 in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma) is an American business executive.
Stephenson replaced Edward E. Whitacre, Jr. as chairman and chief executive officer of AT&T Inc. in 2007. He was senior executive vice president and chief financial officer of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, which he joined in 1982. He was elected as a director of AT&T Inc. in June 2005. He also serves as a director of AT&T Mobility and Emerson Electric Co.
He holds a B.S. from the University of Central Oklahoma and an MBA from the University of Oklahoma.
You know those white male Oklahomans. Liberals to the man.
Well if it is not Viacom or their advertisers then who is it that is pulling the chains? There must be some liberals here somewhere. You know the ones. The ones who are selling a single parent agenda. Well it must be the audience. Could that be it? Those damn Americans. Voting for television programming with their dollars.
Now I know you will dismiss what I wrote but it is the real deal. They are called soap operas because they were used to sell soap.
"The issue isn't just jobs. Even slaves had jobs. The issue is wages." -- Jim Hightower
Dave, Potemkin, Ombrageux: the three pillars of Western civilization. - Donald
- By ingliz
- By Potemkin
- By Puffer Fish