- 02 Feb 2017 17:18
#14771148
Yes the World Wars for starters. They were, fantastic, utterly fantastic for reducing inequality. I have never argued that population is the only factor nor have I argued we need to return to pre-neolithic population levels. Rally what I'm saying should be quite obvious. More people means less land per person. Less land makes poorer, it doesn't matter what peoples priorities, whether its small holder farms like the American sixteenth to eighteenth century immigrants, a bigger garden, a second home, city parks, second homes, partial commons such as private farmland with rambler access or national nature reserves. more people require more roads, more shops, more car parks. It all takes up land.
Nor have I argues that lower population is sufficient to cure all societies ills. But low population such as Norway facilitate progressive socialist wealth sharing redistribution and other progressive measures. The reason the United States is not socialist despite being low population density is Blacks. This is why European Libertarians were so keen to flood Europe with non Whites and alien cultures. They were very envious of the United States.
quetzalcoatl wrote:Inequality in the West has increased to staggering levels in the past half-century. It was reduced markedly in the first half of the 20th century. Something other than population levels was at work, no?
Yes the World Wars for starters. They were, fantastic, utterly fantastic for reducing inequality. I have never argued that population is the only factor nor have I argued we need to return to pre-neolithic population levels. Rally what I'm saying should be quite obvious. More people means less land per person. Less land makes poorer, it doesn't matter what peoples priorities, whether its small holder farms like the American sixteenth to eighteenth century immigrants, a bigger garden, a second home, city parks, second homes, partial commons such as private farmland with rambler access or national nature reserves. more people require more roads, more shops, more car parks. It all takes up land.
Nor have I argues that lower population is sufficient to cure all societies ills. But low population such as Norway facilitate progressive socialist wealth sharing redistribution and other progressive measures. The reason the United States is not socialist despite being low population density is Blacks. This is why European Libertarians were so keen to flood Europe with non Whites and alien cultures. They were very envious of the United States.
Progressives lie scattered on Woke's highway, Diverse ghosts crowd the young child's fragile eggshell mind.