skinster wrote:Nice knowing you Zam, our relationship is over since you're obviously utterly clueless about the US relationship with the Middle East (and Africa).
We had a relationship? … I knew you had a rich fantasy life, but …
… Go back to your Tom Selleck & Tom Cruise foldouts … Please!
The American commitment is obvious, if not openly announced policy. Trump's Iranian decision was inevitable in light of their Syrian adventurism. I would not be surprised if their desperate search for someone to fill in for the US becomes dependent on their withdrawal and guarantees of future behavior.
It's a shame. The Iranian clerics expansionist / anti-Israel motivation ruined a real opportunity for the Iranian people. If they continue to pursue it, the next revolution isn't that far off.
Rich wrote:I wasn't aware that President Amin invited the Soviet invasion. :?:
Not Amin, Taraki. Amin Had just become deputy prime minister.
https://history.state.gov/milestones/1977-1980/soviet-invasion-afghanistan
Amin and Taraki (1978) traveled to Moscow to sign a friendship treaty which included a provision that would allow direct Soviet military assistance should the Islamic insurgency threaten the regime. This insurrection intensified over the next year and it became increasingly obvious to the Soviets that Taraki could not prevent all-out civil war and the prospect of a hostile Islamic government taking control. By mid-1979 Moscow was searching to replace Taraki and Amin, and dispatched combat troops to Bagram Air Base outside of Kabul
It was apparent Taraki and Amin were losing what amounted to an Afghani Civil War. Moscow desperately wanted to replace them. Russian troops were sent just to hold Kabul and prevent the governments complete collapse. (much like the situation with Assad). They were immediately reinforced with tanks & special forces troops.
The following invasion (December) happened after Amin assassinated Taraki (October 79, I think). It was the soviets that executed Amin and installed Karmal.
Zam