Syrian war thread - Page 131 - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Political issues and parties in the nations of the Middle East.

Moderator: PoFo Middle-East Mods

Forum rules: No one line posts please. This is an international political discussion forum moderated in English, so please post in English only. Thank you.
By mikema63
#14828196
Not that I necessarily disbelieve you but that is the sort of post that a link is helpful in. I found news stories about the polling but couldn't find a link to the actual data itself. (To be fair I'm on my phone and only spent 10 minutes looking) I would be interested in seeing it.

I'll just point out that I'm against intervention, before that comes up again.
User avatar
By ingliz
#14828209
The World Tribune was the first to break the story which was then taken up by 'respectable' MSM outlets. I have to assume respectable news organisations would verify the story before going to print.

Sources were the source.

And, to my knowledge, NATO has not published the datasets.


:)
Last edited by ingliz on 30 Jul 2017 07:39, edited 1 time in total.
By mikema63
#14828212
I'm not questioning it's validity, I just wanted to see the whole report, additional questions, etc.
User avatar
By pikachu
#14828275
Democratic socialists. :roll: Liberalism by any other name smells just a shit. Socialism is the dictatorship of the proletariat, it is suit wearers being shot in the street, it is gulags teeming with bankers and landlords learning the joys of working for the first time in their life. It is workers grasping their own future in the own two hands labouring to make life better for themselves and their children under the watchful eye of the NKVD to make sure they don't stray from the one true path into darkness.
Yeah, well, these guys you're talking about here, you know, the ones who came to power in Russia and who invented the gulag and the NKVD, do you happen to remember by any chance how their political party was called at the time when they seized power in Russia?
It was called "Russian Social Democratic Labour Party (bolshevik)" :)

This is just to say that "Democratic Socialism" is historically a pretty broad term. And yeah, today's democratic socialists probably don't identify themselves with Lenin and his methods, but they are still obviously "left", so I am including them as well when I'm saying that the leftist ideology doesn't really go well with supporting the Syrian regime. But it's not only "Democratic Socialists" either, as you can see, I quoted some self-described Marxists and revolutionary socialists as well. The "Syria's voice of conscience" guy was a member of the Syrian Communist Party.
By Decky
#14828277
There are only two groups that stand a chance of winning power over Syria in the long term and they are the government and the clerical reactionaries, left wingers (almost by definition) can not and do not support groups like ISIS, they stand opposed to everything we believe now and have ever believed. No one is buying it. We all know ISIS's arms and intel are both delivered by the Israelis and the Americans, two nations not exactly known for their left wing sentiments. The right stands with ISIS and the left with Assad.
User avatar
By pikachu
#14828281
The data, relayed to NATO over the last month, asserted that 70 percent
of Syrians support the Assad regime. Another 20 percent were deemed neutral and the remaining 10 percent expressed support for the rebels.
That figure matches up well with reality. :) A lightly armed group that has the support of 10% of Syria's population apparently managed to stage massive revolts all over Syria and take control of 80% of Syria's land while fighting against the government that had the overwhelming superiority in firepower from the start and the support of 70% of the population. Also, not a single pro-Assad uprising had ever happened in all the land occupied by the group. I have never seen a more obvious bullshit. :)

The right stands with ISIS and the left with Assad.
yeah okay.
User avatar
By Hindsite
#14828316
pikachu wrote:That figure matches up well with reality. :) A lightly armed group that has the support of 10% of Syria's population apparently managed to stage massive revolts all over Syria and take control of 80% of Syria's land while fighting against the government that had the overwhelming superiority in firepower from the start and the support of 70% of the population. Also, not a single pro-Assad uprising had ever happened in all the land occupied by the group. I have never seen a more obvious bullshit. :)

You seem to ignore that the Obama administration was helping the rebels because they believed "Assad must go". The liberal Democrats say that all the time. That is another reason they don't like Trump. They fear that Trump will side with Russia to keep Assad in power, thus another reason for them to keep the Russian collusion story alive.
User avatar
By Ter
#14828322
Decky wrote:Socialism is the dictatorship of the proletariat, it is suit wearers being shot in the street, it is gulags teeming with bankers and landlords learning the joys of working for the first time in their life. It is workers grasping their own future in the own two hands labouring to make life better for themselves and their children under the watchful eye of the NKVD to make sure they don't stray from the one true path into darkness.

Oh no! Decky wants that nobody should have it good, pushing everybody in the dreck.
I pass for that.
By skinster
#14828594
Decky wrote:That is total nonsense Pikachu...


Exactly.

pikachu wrote: skinster had posted an op-ed by a leftist who is against the Syrian government


If you missed it, that post was reeking of sarcasm since the so-called leftists or socialists who wrote that op-ed sounded like what one would expect reading a statement on Syria coming from the US state dept.

No socialist I know supports imperialism and they certainly do not support Islamists, which is what the opposition of the Syrian govt are.

ingliz wrote:A NATO study shows that 70% of Syrians support President Bashar al-Assad, 20% adopt a neutral position and 10% support the "rebels."


Exactly. The majority of Syrians support their government, and that includes the vast majority of the Syrians who are Sunnis. The government's current reserve soldiers are built largely from Sunni Muslims.

For some reason people are still of the crap assumption that the majority of rebels came from Syria. They did not. They came from 80 different countries, paid for by the British, American, French, Gulf States etc. and trained by and in Israel, Jordan, Turkey.
User avatar
By Hindsite
#14831109
Decky wrote:There are only two groups that stand a chance of winning power over Syria in the long term and they are the government and the clerical reactionaries, left wingers (almost by definition) can not and do not support groups like ISIS, they stand opposed to everything we believe now and have ever believed. No one is buying it. We all know ISIS's arms and intel are both delivered by the Israelis and the Americans, two nations not exactly known for their left wing sentiments. The right stands with ISIS and the left with Assad.

I am not sure that you are serious about the right supporting ISIS. But as a conservative American, I consider myself on the right politically; but I certainly do not stand with ISIS or any other Islamic terrorists. I want them totally destroyed just like President Donald Trump has said.
By Decky
#14831167
Hindsite wrote:I am not sure that you are serious about the right supporting ISIS. But as a conservative American, I consider myself on the right politically; but I certainly do not stand with ISIS or any other Islamic terrorists. I want them totally destroyed just like President Donald Trump has said.



Who armed and trained BinLaden? The Republican party. Who armed and trained the Mujahideen? The Republican party. Who created the Taliban? The Republican party. Face it man, your side are very pro Islamic extremism.

Image

As a matter of fact I agree with Regan when he claimed that "these men are the moral equivalents of the American founding fathers." Right wing terrorist nutjobs all tend to be more or less the same in most respects.
User avatar
By Oxymoron
#14831323
Rich wrote:The left right spectrum is not an unchanging timeless absolute. It is very much relative to time and place. A single dimensional spectrum is obliviously a crude simplification, but it is a surprisingly effective model. Issues change and sometimes left and right can even reverse on an issue, we particularly see this with the Republican and Democratic parties. The Founding fathers were left wing and radical left wing for their time and place. Sorry if this upsets you.


I gave you an example of true leftist political movement in the levelers almost a century before the american revolution. The same revolution tried to install washington as king. So spare me your bull
User avatar
By JohnRawls
#14831324
Oxymoron wrote:I gave you an example of true leftist political movement in the levelers almost a century before the american revolution. The same revolution tried to install washington as king. So spare me your bull


Communists/Leftists wanted to install Washington as king? :| Do you even think? :|
User avatar
By Oxymoron
#14831326
JohnRawls wrote:Communists/Leftists wanted to install Washington as king? :| Do you even think? :|


Reading comprehension son.... the American revolution wanted to install Washington king. read dude
  • 1
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 205
Russia-Ukraine War 2022

This post was made on the 16th April two years ag[…]

Thank goodness saner heads and science is prevaili[…]

4 foot tall Chinese parents are regularly giving b[…]

Israel-Palestinian War 2023

https://twitter.com/hermit_hwarang/status/1779130[…]