Vanasalus wrote:If one is blaming Turkey with genocide, he/she should explain to me why 3.6 million Syrian refuges, of whom there are 300 thousand Syrian Kurds, took refuge in such a "genocidal" country.
Turks aren't entirely adverse to genocide; however, at this point it is "ethnic cleansing" and nobody is calling it genocide except for people like you who use it as a polemic term.
Mossul, Raqqa, Homs, Allepo, etc., all suffered terrible destruction and NOT "genocide". In fact, they suffered terrible destruction because they were held by a genocidal bunch of Islamist fanatics (supported by Turkey). Yes, in this case, the term genocide is appropriate, if you extend it to religious minorities like the Yazidis. Thus, in this case, Turkey is guilty of genocide if we consider the support it has given to various terrorist groups.
And I'm not very impressed by your crocodile tears for the refugees. Turkey deliberately fueled the proxy war to topple the Syrian government. You host the refugees not for humanitarian reasons, but as pawns in Erdogan's geopolitical game to annex parts of Syria to realize his neo-Ottoman dreams. Neither Germany nor Greece (who also host Syrian refugees) is in any position to annex parts of Syria. Besides, the refugees fuel the Turkish economy.
And yes, we do care about the terrible suffering of Syrians, which is largely due to Turkish support for the proxy war.