Indian Military Accidents - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Political issues and parties in India.

Moderator: PoFo Asia & Australasia Mods

Forum rules: No one-line posts please. This is an international political discussion forum moderated in English, so please post in English only. Thank you.
By foxdemon
#14287709

Indian sub explodes, sinks, 18 aboard

Wednesday, August 14, 2013 » 06:34pm


A diesel-powered Indian submarine has exploded and sunk in a Mumbai dock, leaving 18 sailors missing and the navy counting the cost of a major setback in its ambitious modernisation program.

The fully-armed INS Sindhurakshak, returned by Russia in January after a major refit, is nose-down in the water, with just a small part visible above the surface, the navy said.

India's defence minister described the explosion on Wednesday as the 'greatest tragedy in recent time', saying people were killed in the explosion but gave no further details.

'I feel sad about those navy personnel who have lost their lives in service of the country,' A.K Antony told reporters in New Delhi.

The blast came days after New Delhi trumpeted the launch of its first domestically-produced aircraft carrier and the start of sea trials for its first Indian-made nuclear submarine.

Grainy amateur video footage taken by a witness showed the fierce explosion in the forward section of the vessel which lit up the sky at the naval dockyard shortly after midnight.

'The cause of the explosion is not known. We are searching for the 18 personnel,' navy spokesman Narendra Kumar Vispute told AFP.

He said divers had been deployed once the flames were extinguished by fire trucks, which rushed to the scene and battled the blaze for several hours.

'Some sailors and other personnel who were in the vicinity of the submarine have been admitted to INHS Asvini (naval hospital) with injuries,' said navy spokesman P.V.S. Satish.

'Eighteen sailors were on board the submarine, they have not been evacuated yet,' Satish told AFP.

The submarine was fully operational and was therefore carrying a 'full complement of torpedoes and missiles', he said.

'This is a huge loss,' Satish added.

In February 2010, the INS Sindhurakshak also suffered a fire while docked in Visakhapatnam city in southern India, killing a 24-year-old sailor and leaving two others with burns.

'There were two to three explosions and the night sky lit up briefly,' said eyewitness Dharmendra Jaiswal, who works in a public toilet near the dockyard and was sleeping there overnight.

'There was a lot of smoke and I thought it was some major repair work,' he told AFP.

The explosion did not damage another submarine docked nearby in the yard, a colonial-era facility that employs more than 10,000 people, the navy said.

An inquiry into the cause of the explosion has been ordered amid speculation about what might have caused the fire.

One senior navy officer, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the 'needle of suspicion' was on the battery system, but he stressed that these were early assumptions.

Satish confirmed that the fire broke out in the forward section where the battery system and torpedoes are located.

A spokesman for the Russian Zvyozdochka company, which overhauled INS Sindhurakshak, said that India had raised no objections about the vessel when it was returned in January.

Rahul Bedi, a defence expert with IHS Jane's Defence Weekly, told AFP the submarine was commissioned from Russia in 1997 and lacked some modern safety features common to newer vessels.

'They don't have escape routes in the event of accidents unlike some of the modern submarines,' he said.

The Navy said it had a total of 14 submarines but only between seven and nine are operational at any point because of regular repair and refitting operations.

C. Uday Bhaskar, a retired naval officer and former director of the National Maritime Foundation in New Delhi, called the loss a 'major setback'.

Arun Prakash, a former Indian navy chief, said that the 'it looks like a pretty massive explosion'.

'There is a possibility that these 18 crewmen may have sealed themselves off in some part of the submarine and they may still have survived,' he told the CNN-IBN news channel.

'Otherwise with this massive explosion chances don't look very bright,' he added.

INS Sindhurakshak is a kilo-class submarine which normally operates with a crew of 53 people and can sail on its own for 45 days, the Indian navy website says.

link



Condolences to the families of the missing sailors.
#14287738
Indeed, condolences to the crew.

Satish confirmed that the fire broke out in the forward section where the battery system and torpedoes are located.


I think this is the likely candidate, the vessel was apparently sent to Russia for refit due to a fire in 2010...

INS Sindhurakshak, inducted in 1997, suffered a fire in 2010 in which a sailor was killed. Three months after the fire, the submarine was sent to Russia for a major refit that lasted three years. All its major systems were overhauled and repaired, and it was given the new Club-S AShM and Porpoise radar, in addition to a modernization of its cooling system.

http://www.livefistdefence.com/

Rahul Bedi, a defence expert with IHS Jane's Defence Weekly, told AFP the submarine was commissioned from Russia in 1997 and lacked some modern safety features common to newer vessels.

'They don't have escape routes in the event of accidents unlike some of the modern submarines,' he said.


The vessels have an exit at each end like and the middle like any other submarine, what more to these people want?

“Diesel submarines of the Project 877 Varshavyanka (Kilo) class are one hundred percent safe if we don’t take the human factor into account,” Alexander Lytvynchuk, a former senior electromechanical specialist of the Pacific Fleet, told RIA Novosti. “They have reliable diesel engines, easy maintenance and require only a timely preventative maintenance and inspections. Diesel-electric submarines, can be operated in any latitude - the southern as well. I sailed on these boats into the Indian Ocean four times from 8 to 12 months, and there were no problems.”
Ammunition loaded into the submarine could not detonate “in any case,” Lytvynchuk said. According to him, the submarine has three degrees of safeguards and hadn’t met with a serious accident since the 1980s.
“Yes, of course, any mechanism has a weak point, and for diesel-electric boats such points are batteries - two battery packs for 122 elements each. During normal operations, it is not a threat. But if not properly serviced, hydrogen can accumulate up to four percent and the hydrogen mixture can then explode,” Lytvynchuk added.

http://indrus.in/news/2013/08/14/sindhu ... 28443.html

Moving the goalposts won't change the facts on th[…]

There were formidable defense lines in the Donbas[…]

World War II Day by Day

March 28, Thursday No separate peace deal with G[…]

Russia-Ukraine War 2022

Meanwhile, your opponents argue that everyone e[…]