[Tribbles]

In the 1920s, 1930s, The fascist in southern Europe loved corporatism and class-collaboration, even though some were syndicalists, and wanted a more purely worker-controlled political system.

In the same period, the social democrats took up the same idea, and created Tripartism, which is a somewhat simpler model, that functions in harmony with parliamentarism:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tripartism

As history has progressed, the right have turned against tripartism (Or rather, the traditional right have always been against it, as it involves unions) and as I have lately discovered, so have the fascists.

Which leaves tripartism and corporatism the domain of the social democracts. It could stay that way forever, but I still feel that the social democrats needs some sort of opposition, that comes from a party with visions that are more grand then what they have. In may place at least, they are a great disappointment on environmentalism and foreign policy.

Hence my suggestion for a further development of tripartism/corporatism.
http://bildr.no/view/992058

I have been thinking about setting up a website for T.F (Probably full name and my picture on it, no need to be anonymous on such a project). Im thinking about starting it as a international site with a forum, and then those who like it can start national organizations that the main T.F site links to.

Do people here think there is room for such a movement?

[anarchist6]

Would secession be allowed? If not its tyrannic.

[Rei Murasame]

I'd say give it a spin and see what feedback you receive, your idea is not bad in my view. However, you are going to need a narrative to explain the historical role of what you are trying to do, you can't just present it as "this would surely be a rather nice way to run a country".

Without a story, people will not connect with it. Also, I am a little concerned about your attempts to strike out alone, rather than trying to join in with already-existing Third Position groups in your country. I'd say that in 2012, you should really think about that, since there is strength in numbers, etc.

[Tribbles]

In many of my posts so far, I have been writing about the decaying nature of my local rightwing-populist right. (Which I therefore will not join, obviously)

And I am also a bit uncertain about a whole variety of subjects. So perhaps I would function better as a rank-and-file member, then as a entrepreneur?

But to not be an entrepreneur, and still be politically active, there must exist a platform that is not too far away from ones beliefs.

Issues like that.