Atlantis wrote:
The consensus among my fellows and family is that this actually works, because these bottles are made of materials designed to block off particles. Looks ridiculous yes, but it works.
Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...
Atlantis wrote:
Authored by Mike Shedlock via MishTalk,
Bianco Research mapped out the geometric progression of coronavirus cases. We are on track for 100K in a week.
Jim Bianco shared some of his coronavirus research with me yesterday. I asked if he would make the article public.
Thanks to Bianco please consider Coronavirus Growth Rates and Market Reactions.
This is a guest post courtesy of Bianco Research
Summary
The growth in coronavirus infections has continued along a geometric progression for the last 12 days. Should it continue along this path, infection cases could approach 100,000 in a week.
Comments
The following charts were constructed from the daily update from the National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China.
The blue line in the chart below shows the actual number of reported coronavirus cases stands at 4,515 as of January 27.
The orange line is a simple progression that assumes a 53% increase in the cases every day. Or, one person infects 2 to 2.5 people. So it is a simple multiplier, nothing more. This is known as R0 (R-Naught), or the infection rate. Note the chart is a log scale.
The reported number of infections perfectly track this simple multiplier. This is how viral inflections growth, along a geometric path.
If this track is not altered, the number of reported cases will top 16,000 by Friday.
Not trying to be an alarmist, but the number of confirmed coronavirus cases has jumped by more 50% to nearly 4,500 in less than 24 hours. It's possible today's stock market dip-buyers were a bit premature. https://t.co/OJ9fBMfwhX
— fred hickey (@htsfhickey) January 28, 2020
To many, such a geometric progression is alarming (see the tweet immediately above).
As the orange line shows, this type of growth rate would suggest 80,000+ infections next Monday and 138 million by February 20.
Is this growth rate possible? Over the near-term yes.
The National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China offers another statistic, the number of people in quarantine suspected of having the coronavirus. As of January 27, over 44,000 are quarantined. Many of these people will unfortunately be reported as infected.
To be absolutely clear, this is NOT a prediction that 100 million people will be infected by Feb 20. Rather, this has been its growth rate for the last 12 days. A vaccine, mutation or successful quarantine/isolation could help reduce this growth rate.
Market Implications
Mongolia and North Korea have already closed their border with China. Hong Kong is restricting its border. As cases continue to emerge in Japan and outside of Asia, calls will grow for the Chinese to engage in drastic action to stop its spread.
This potentially means Chinese businesses will halt, flights will stop (see the plunge in crude oil on oversupply worries) and the global supply chain will grind to a halt. This could have enormous economic consequences for global growth.
While not overlooking the human tragedy, the markets have the difficult task of pricing an event that has a small chance of being devastating to global growth, but a more likely outcome of being contained. Yesterday’s selloff in stocks was likely a response to the fact that this virus has continued to grow at a geometric pace thus far. In trying to quantify the market impact, perhaps these charts offer one way to gauge the severity of this virus in the days ahead.
End Guest Post
Here is another link echoing Bianco's market concerns.
Coronavirus fallout could shock the global economy into recession, Stephen Roach warns https://t.co/w0X80ceuK0
— Jeff Lee (@JeffLee2020) January 29, 2020
* * *
Saeko wrote:There are now 6000 cases worldwide.
I've already made funeral arrangements.
JohnRawls wrote:That is less than 0.0001% of the world population.
Saeko wrote:Even with that it is unlikely the virus will kill big. Viruses that are too deadly do not have chance to spread out. Arguably this coronavirus is more contagious because it is less deadly. Of course, with a race of robbers and lazy bums living next to us I am not too confident myself either.
6000 might be less than 0.0001% of the world population, but in a few months it could be 100% of the world's population.
Saeko wrote:6000 might be less than 0.0001% of the world population, but in a few months it could be 100% of the world's population.
Patrickov wrote:Of course, with a race of robbers and lazy bums living next to us I am not too confident myself either.
colliric wrote:A Hong Kong city-state. We can only hope.
Patrickov wrote:Consensus in Hong Kong is that WHO, and many international organisations, are controlled or bribed by the corrupt and face-before-reason Chinese. Otherwise I cannot find a reason why WHO still does not declare emergency and China an epidemic region.
Ter wrote:We are officially up to 7730 confirmed cases in China, with 170 dead so far.
That keeps the case fatality rate steady at 2.2 %
For whatever it is worth:
https://www.zerohedge.com/health/corona ... tions-week
Ter wrote:I understand that if WHO declares a global health emergency that there are very serious economic consequences. However, what China itself has done, quarantining so many millions of its citizens, is in itself unprecedented. I wonder what a WHO declaration would signify in addition to what we have already.
JohnRawls wrote:That scale is fear monrgering. All viruses/diseases/epidemics follow a sigmoid curve usually. We are currently somewhere in the middle. The better question is when are we going to top out.
Rancid wrote:Where's skinster to tell us this is all a CIA plot?
https://twitter.com/ShadowofEzra/status/178113719[…]
Yes Chomsky - the Pepsi-Cola professor of Linguis[…]