- 27 Nov 2023 19:56
#15296842
(This thread involves healthcare in the United States)
It took 13 years, but Elizabeth Warren is at long last acknowledging that ObamaCare has increased healthcare prices and industry consolidation. Who would have believed it? Government price controls and profit caps have resulted in unintended consequences.
(Elizabeth Warren is a Senator from the Democratic Party who was a Presidential candidate in the 2020 election. She came in close second place to getting the nomination, right behind Joe Biden)
The Massachusetts Senator and Republican Senator Mike Braun of Indiana this week wrote a letter to the Health and Human Services Department inspector general complaining that the nation’s largest health insurers are dodging ObamaCare’s medical loss ratio (MLR). The result, they say, is higher costs for patients.
The MLR is a de facto cap on profits. It requires that insurers spend at least 80% or 85% of premium dollars on medical claims. Democrats claimed the rule would make health spending more transparent and reduce insurer spending on overhead. “Consumers will receive more value for their premium dollar,” the Obama HHS said.
Instead, as we’ve been pointing out for years, the rule has spurred insurers to merge with or acquire pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), retail and specialty pharmacies, and healthcare providers. This has made healthcare spending less transparent since insurers can shift profits to their affiliates by increasing reimbursements.
The Senators cite a Journal news story in September that found insurers were paying affiliated specialty pharmacies more than 20 times for generic drugs what manufacturers charged. Patients can get slammed by hefty out-of-pocket cost for these drugs if they have high deductibles or co-insurance requirements.
“Even worse,” the Senators write, “insurers can use their PBMs to steer patients to their own pharmacies, while disadvantaging competing pharmacies with lower reimbursements and predatory fees.” In a 2017 editorial we highlighted complaints that CVS’s PBM was paying independent pharmacies less than the wholesale drug cost while billing Medicaid for significantly more.
The Senators complain that insurers have evaded the MLR by vertically integrating with other companies in the healthcare supply chain. “Cigna, United Health, and CVS Aetna each own or are affiliated with the country’s three largest PBMs,” they write. Insurers are also increasingly buying providers. CVS this year acquired primary care provider Oak Street Health.
“Just a year after the MLR requirement was put in place, UnitedHealth Group formed Optum, which now includes a PBM and a specialty pharmacy, as well as over 70,000 physicians,” the Senators write. Coincidence? “Today, UnitedHealth Group sends 25 percent of its medical claim revenue to its Optum subsidiaries—in other words, to itself.”
They correctly point out that an insurance conglomerate can inflate medical payments to affiliates to comply with the MLR “while keeping more money for itself.” Market competition would normally act as a check on premiums and profits. However, by driving industry consolidation, ObamaCare has reduced healthcare competition and increased costs.
Hospitals have acquired independent physician practices to gain more leverage with vertically integrated insurers, allowing them to bill more for services. Independent pharmacies have closed or been sold to the giants. It’s no surprise, then, that health premiums have risen on average about 20% faster since 2011 when the MLR took effect than in the five preceding years.
ObamaCare’s market distortions are spurring a bipartisan movement in Congress to regulate PBMs. It’s a familiar story: Big government intervention creates incentives and raises costs that help big business, and then politicians demand more government intervention to fix the distortions they caused.
Elizabeth Warren Has an ObamaCare Epiphany, The Wall Street Journal, Nov 2023
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/e ... r-AA1kunTI
Once again, it looks like insurance companies have found a way to rig the system.
So it looks like the passage of one comprehensive system of laws has caused a problem, and now it looks like they're going to have to pass another law to patch the problem.
Only I suspect this new law, to limit monopolies, will end up having unintended effects combined with the original package and will push up prices and reduce the possibility for health savings, which was part of the whole package deal in Obamacare. It was argued that through vertical integration, insurance companies would be able to achieve cost savings.
I bet the insurance companies only avoided pouring money behind opposing Obamacare, back during the time it was passed, because of provisions like this that they knew would benefit them. So part of this does seem like a little bit of a "bait and switch".
It took 13 years, but Elizabeth Warren is at long last acknowledging that ObamaCare has increased healthcare prices and industry consolidation. Who would have believed it? Government price controls and profit caps have resulted in unintended consequences.
(Elizabeth Warren is a Senator from the Democratic Party who was a Presidential candidate in the 2020 election. She came in close second place to getting the nomination, right behind Joe Biden)
The Massachusetts Senator and Republican Senator Mike Braun of Indiana this week wrote a letter to the Health and Human Services Department inspector general complaining that the nation’s largest health insurers are dodging ObamaCare’s medical loss ratio (MLR). The result, they say, is higher costs for patients.
The MLR is a de facto cap on profits. It requires that insurers spend at least 80% or 85% of premium dollars on medical claims. Democrats claimed the rule would make health spending more transparent and reduce insurer spending on overhead. “Consumers will receive more value for their premium dollar,” the Obama HHS said.
Instead, as we’ve been pointing out for years, the rule has spurred insurers to merge with or acquire pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), retail and specialty pharmacies, and healthcare providers. This has made healthcare spending less transparent since insurers can shift profits to their affiliates by increasing reimbursements.
The Senators cite a Journal news story in September that found insurers were paying affiliated specialty pharmacies more than 20 times for generic drugs what manufacturers charged. Patients can get slammed by hefty out-of-pocket cost for these drugs if they have high deductibles or co-insurance requirements.
“Even worse,” the Senators write, “insurers can use their PBMs to steer patients to their own pharmacies, while disadvantaging competing pharmacies with lower reimbursements and predatory fees.” In a 2017 editorial we highlighted complaints that CVS’s PBM was paying independent pharmacies less than the wholesale drug cost while billing Medicaid for significantly more.
The Senators complain that insurers have evaded the MLR by vertically integrating with other companies in the healthcare supply chain. “Cigna, United Health, and CVS Aetna each own or are affiliated with the country’s three largest PBMs,” they write. Insurers are also increasingly buying providers. CVS this year acquired primary care provider Oak Street Health.
“Just a year after the MLR requirement was put in place, UnitedHealth Group formed Optum, which now includes a PBM and a specialty pharmacy, as well as over 70,000 physicians,” the Senators write. Coincidence? “Today, UnitedHealth Group sends 25 percent of its medical claim revenue to its Optum subsidiaries—in other words, to itself.”
They correctly point out that an insurance conglomerate can inflate medical payments to affiliates to comply with the MLR “while keeping more money for itself.” Market competition would normally act as a check on premiums and profits. However, by driving industry consolidation, ObamaCare has reduced healthcare competition and increased costs.
Hospitals have acquired independent physician practices to gain more leverage with vertically integrated insurers, allowing them to bill more for services. Independent pharmacies have closed or been sold to the giants. It’s no surprise, then, that health premiums have risen on average about 20% faster since 2011 when the MLR took effect than in the five preceding years.
ObamaCare’s market distortions are spurring a bipartisan movement in Congress to regulate PBMs. It’s a familiar story: Big government intervention creates incentives and raises costs that help big business, and then politicians demand more government intervention to fix the distortions they caused.
Elizabeth Warren Has an ObamaCare Epiphany, The Wall Street Journal, Nov 2023
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/e ... r-AA1kunTI
Once again, it looks like insurance companies have found a way to rig the system.
So it looks like the passage of one comprehensive system of laws has caused a problem, and now it looks like they're going to have to pass another law to patch the problem.
Only I suspect this new law, to limit monopolies, will end up having unintended effects combined with the original package and will push up prices and reduce the possibility for health savings, which was part of the whole package deal in Obamacare. It was argued that through vertical integration, insurance companies would be able to achieve cost savings.
I bet the insurance companies only avoided pouring money behind opposing Obamacare, back during the time it was passed, because of provisions like this that they knew would benefit them. So part of this does seem like a little bit of a "bait and switch".
- By QatzelOk