Hi everyone, and a question - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Please introduce yourself here.
User avatar
By Rousse
#14752507
Hi everyone. :) A friend of mine on Reddit recommended this place, so I decided to check it out. I'm an American female college student, raised in the hilly forests of Northern California.

I'm a supporter of workplace democracy, a staunch feminist, a hardliner on combating climate change, a supporter of Danish-style universal healthcare, being bi myself a supporter of LGBT rights, and believe something really needs to be done to solve MAD. These are positions that would align me with the left. In theory I'm sympathetic to Marxism, I see value in his class/historical analyses and believe the trend towards automation of labor must be coupled with increased democratization lest it lead to an underclass of "useless eaters" at the mercy of ever more technologically savvy elites. However, Marxian ideologies have an orthopraxis as well as an orthodoxy. In terms of praxis, frankly I'm best described as a democratic socialist, and that's charitable. FDR-style social democrat frankly fits better in some ways despite open support for workers' self-management, mostly because I'm culturally somewhat alienated from even the Corbynista demsoc left.

There are also areas where I'm better aligned with the right today, though a few decades ago my stances would be read as moderate. On questions of nationality and identity that seem to predominate here, I think the newly-emergent global world system needs to find a balance between economically necessary and genetically beneficial in small doses migration of labor, and preservation of the indigenous values which sustain a culture plus their unique phenotypes along with maintaining the prevailing wage for native workers. As such, I think movements pushing for tightening immigration controls through mechanisms like increased border policing and mandated employee legal status checks when new migrants come in unassimilable waves are a healthy response in a democracy which balances out capital's desire to meet basic economic demands. That said, for those who have already spent their whole lives in a given country, I don't think deportation is humane and would support a conditional pathway to citizenship. I'm a foreign policy realist, I stand strongly against rapid democratization efforts in areas with no cultural background of liberalism and despite calls from the naive left (most online communists) and right (most Trump fanboys), think the era of "great game" realpolitik is unfortunately far from over as we're in ever-greater competition over increasingly expensive resources like petroleum. I also support as localist and decentral a government as feasibly possible, though this is only a distinctively "right-wing" stance in America and the realities of modern nation-state competition mean the most decentralized a state can be to thrive probably isn't significantly greater than Western states are structured today.

In recent political upheavals, I supported Brexit as replacement is likely the only viable way to restructure the EU in a less parasitic direction, reluctantly supported Clinton over Trump on the grounds that his temperament is risky and his stance on climate change is severely dangerous which doesn't balance out his slightly better (though more extreme than I'd like) immigration stance, and supported Renzi's referendum to make Italy governable.

Also I'm a hipster indie music snob, English literature aficionado, a Disney fanatic, and a member of Tri Delta sorority which on my campus is a group of theater geeks. My name is a reference to my status as a proud ginger.

P.S. I can't seem to change my avatar to anything but a great pube-bearded ex-President.
#14752519
I'm a supporter of workplace democracy, a staunch feminist, a hardliner on combating climate change, a supporter of Danish-style universal healthcare, being bi myself a supporter of LGBT rights, and believe something really needs to be done to solve MAD. These are positions that would align me with the left.


Solve MAD? :?: If you mean mutually assured destruction it was its existence that saved the left for many decades. Without the Soviet Union's large nuclear arsenal it is likely the Americans and their puppets would have bought the Soviet people "freedom" far earlier than 1991. A well armed revolutionary state is a safe revolutionary state.

Welcome to the forum anyway. What do you like to read?

As for the avatar there is a drop down menu. If you change it from gallery avatar to remote avatar you can use anything you like (providing it is an 100x100 pixel black and while portrait of a human being). :)
#14752531
Hello Rousse,

Welcome to the forum, we recently added a Reddit login button so you can now link your 2 profiles in your User Control Panel and login directly using the Reddit Login Button.

Thanks for letting us know about the Avatar.

We are undertaking an Avatar plugin which will allow users to upload an avatar and edit it live, such as crop, resize, rotate, the installation has proven a bit buggy and the avatar function is currently not working for some browsers, but we are working to fix the issue.

In order to aid us with that, please report which browser you are using, try to use another browser and see if it works, I realised that Safari works but Chrome and Firefox are having an issue with the avatar function at the moment but we are doing our best to fix it.
#14752553
The issue has now been resolved.

To use a different avatar, you should choose 'Avatar Type' in your User Control Panel.

And choose either:

a) Remote Avatar in which case you will need a url with an avatar. See instructions here-First Paragraph Titled Images.
b) Upload Avatar in which case you will need to upload an avatar that is less than 2MB and less than 200X200 px, B&W, image of a person.
#14752575
Thanks for the welcome, everyone! As far as the avatar issue, I'm still having it. I click Submit after either linking an outside avatar or uploading one, it doesn't show. I'm on Chrome, I'll try another browser and see if that helps.

Decky wrote:Solve MAD? :?: If you mean mutually assured destruction it was its existence that saved the left for many decades. Without the Soviet Union's large nuclear arsenal it is likely the Americans and their puppets would have bought the Soviet people "freedom" far earlier than 1991. A well armed revolutionary state is a safe revolutionary state.

They also pushed for gradual draw-down, they funded non-proliferation efforts far more than NATO. As America reduced our nuclear supply, they could as well. While I'm otherwise not his biggest fan considering he cemented the USSR as a nomenklatura-dominated bureaucratic monstrosity, Khrushchev was tremendously and rightly concerned with the risk of humanity's nuclear annihilation, especially considering the Cuban Missile Crisis was a hair's inch from going that direction. Vasili Arkhipov is an unspoken hero who might have saved the human race.

Welcome to the forum anyway. What do you like to read?

Political works and the vague "the news," obviously. ;) Also I'm big on fantasy, I'm a humongous Harry Potter fan and Thronie. In terms of classics, I adore Victoriana.
#14752583
Robert Louis Stevenson, Charles Dickens, the Bronte's or what?

Also conscript deserves what he is given and nothing more. :p
#14752622
Decky wrote:Robert Louis Stevenson, Charles Dickens, the Bronte's or what?

All of the above, though especially the Brontes.

As far as American literature goes, I'm a fan of co-authors of the California socialist biblical canon John Steinbeck and Jack London, Poe, Whitman, and the whole genre of 20th century Midwestern writers like Fitzgerald and Hemingway.
#14752682
Rousse wrote:Thanks for the welcome, everyone! As far as the avatar issue, I'm still having it. I click Submit after either linking an outside avatar or uploading one, it doesn't show. I'm on Chrome, I'll try another browser and see if that helps.


Should be fine now. And a Gravatar option exists now as well.
#14752752
Why do you say that?

Also, come to think of it this forum has a lot of hipster Marxists that wouldn't last long in a campus activist circle..

the trend towards automation of labor must be coupled with increased democratization lest it lead to an underclass of "useless eaters" at the mercy of ever more technologically savvy elites. 


One thing I've wondered is how abundance and automation under capitalism affects the left. Obviously abundance is a key part of communism, however this creates an end to the need to work rather than meaning you starve. But before then, what do advocates for labor do? And obviously you cannot be a luddite
#14752823
Thanks for the help, Noemon. I was successfully able to switch from Pube-Beard Lincoln to the prettiest woman alive and honorary ginger because she rocks that dyed hair so perfectly, Deborah Ann Woll.

Conscript wrote:Obviously abundance is a key part of communism, however this creates an end to the need to work rather than meaning you starve. But before then, what do advocates for labor do?

I think we'll need to find some way to breed white-collar/service sector unionization, those jobs are often too complicated to automatize and will continue to grow as the backbone of the Western economy. Infrastructure projects will stave off the decline in blue-collar work, but that's nothing more than a holding measure.

We'll also need a support system for the ranks of the unemployed which will continually swell as more and more blue-collar jobs are lost. This shouldn't be enticing, otherwise nobody would work, but covering bare basic housing and food costs will keep them alive and prevent luddite riots. Long-term, I can foresee two likely trends.

1. Given the smaller number of jobs relative to the amount of people, the economy will probably operate more based on shifts thus reducing work hours for everyone. If hourly wage demands rise in conjunction, allowing people the same standard of living on less work, this is a good thing. However, the possibility for that is shaky in the short-term, because output wouldn't increase until machines can self-replicate. Our stores and offices are only barely understaffed, there likely won't be a large increase in job openings in response to the flood of unemployed labor.

2. Many individuals will probably acclimate to bare subsistence living, exacerbated by lower short-term living standards. Some type of population decline will probably be necessary to deal with this, unless you want them to be a permanent underclass which will continually demand more and occasionally panic about their lack of advancement prospects. As birth rates decline directly in tandem to rising female education rates, full force defense of public education from efforts to destroy it seems like the best option for now and also strengthens meritocratic social mobility. A Chinese-style one child policy probably won't be necessary.
Russia-Ukraine War 2022

Mobilizing for Defeat The Zelensky regime insi[…]

He's a parasite

Trump Derangement Syndrome lives. :O

Israel-Palestinian War 2023

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gjbl_6RDhkM :D […]