[skinster]

[Pants-of-dog]

So what is the problem with vaccines and menstruation?

The tweets are very uninformative.

[skinster]

Not that you care, but here's a recent report talking of what happens to some women who got vaccinated:

Here are a few reports
https://openpublichealthjournal.com/VOL ... /FULLTEXT/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37738335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9294036/

[Pants-of-dog]

https://openpublichealthjournal.com/VOL ... /FULLTEXT/

ABSTRACT
Background:
Prior clinical studies that sought to investigate the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines did not list menstrual cycle changes as a side-effect. However, following reported cases of menstrual cycle disturbances after vaccination, this study sought to examine the link between COVID-19 vaccination and post-vaccine menstrual cycle abnormalities in pre-and post-menopausal women.

Methods:
A cross-sectional research design approach using online surveys were employed to investigate the link between vaccination and changes in the menstrual cycle. The participants consisted of a cohort of 657 pre-and post-menopausal women, with the majority drawn from the reproductive age group (25-44 years). The inclusion criteria were that participants must have received any type of COVID-19 vaccine, not be pregnant and those that did not have a negative diagnosis in any gynecologic condition. Of the eligible sample size, only 344 participants met the inclusion criteria.

The sociodemographic and menstrual cycle data were collected from an online survey. Data was analyzed using descriptive, inferential chi-square tests, logistic regression, and correlation.

Results:
The results partially confirmed the findings from prior studies that COVID-19 vaccination is associated with significant changes in the women’s menstrual cycle flow and menstrual period length even after controlling for age, Body Mass Index, and ethnicity. Other menstrual cycle disturbances such as missed periods, cycle regularity, and spotting/vaginal bleeding were noted to be less significant. However, the extent of menstrual cycle changes was less severe and decreased after the second dose of vaccination. It was found that 11.1% and 37.5% of post-menopausal women reported menstrual symptoms after the first and second dose cycles, respectively.

Conclusion:
The study concludes that although COVID-19 vaccines tend to adversely affect women’s menstrual cycle, these changes are short-lived. The findings have important implications in enhancing the success of COVID-19 vaccination programs by reducing cases of vaccine hesitancy among reproductive-age women.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37738335/

Abstract

The association between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination and vaginal bleeding among nonmenstruating women is not well studied. The Norwegian Institute of Public Health followed several cohorts throughout the pandemic and early performed a systematic data collection of self-reported unexpected vaginal bleeding in nonmenstruating women. Among 7725 postmenopausal women, 7148 perimenopausal women, and 7052 premenopausal women, 3.3, 14.1, and 13.1% experienced unexpected vaginal bleeding during a period of 8 to 9 months, respectively. In postmenopausal women, the risk of unexpected vaginal bleeding (i.e., postmenopausal bleeding) in the 4 weeks after COVID-19 vaccination was increased two- to threefold, compared to a prevaccination period. The corresponding risk of unexpected vaginal bleeding after vaccination was increased three- to fivefold in both nonmenstruating peri- and premenopausal women. In the premenopausal women, Spikevax was associated with at 32% increased risk as compared to Comirnaty. Our results must be confirmed in future studies.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9294036/

The objective of this systematic review is to give a comprehensive interpretation of menstrual cycle changes after the COVID-19 vaccination. Additionally, it is imperative to assess reports of menstrual changes following vaccination to dispel concerns that COVID-19 vaccines hinder the likelihood of pregnancy in the long run. A literature review was conducted using digital databases to systematically identify the studies reporting any menstrual abnormalities after the COVID-19 vaccine. Detailed patient-level study characteristics including the type of study, sample size, administered vaccines, and menstrual abnormalities were abstracted. A total of 78 138 vaccinated females were included in this review from 14 studies. Of these, 39 759 (52.05%) had some form of a menstrual problem after vaccination. Due to the lack of published research articles, preprints were also included in this review. Menorrhagia, metrorrhagia, and polymenorrhea were the most commonly observed problems and the overall study-level rate of menstrual abnormality ranged from 0.83% to 90.9%. Age, history of pregnancy, systemic side-effects of COVID-19, smoking, and second dose of COVID-19 vaccine were predictors of menstrual problems after vaccination.

While this can be very disconcerting for people with a very regular menstrual cycle, these irregularities would not even be noticed for those people who have a more irregular cycle.

[skinster]

Some of the women bleeding had stopped getting periods and began getting them again because of the vaccines. But sure sure, the vaccine was safe and effective!

[Pants-of-dog]

The effects on menstruation should definitely be communicated to anyone with a uterus who is also thinking of getting the vaccine.

This does not seem to have an effect on the safety or efficacy of the vaccines, save for those few who have serious conditions that could be impacted by menstrual irregularities.

[skinster]

The effects on menstruation have been spoken about very quickly after they were rolled out. Here's one report from two years ago. No side-effects re: menstruation problems were stated back then, nor are they today. But since then, we've found much more info about these side-effects. BTW, that report from 2021, you would be one to dismiss it outright back then, as you do to pretty much everything I post on here, even though a lot of the stuff is uncontroversial as far as people talking about it.

You are very strange in your massive defence for experiemental medications when it comes to covid vaccines and puberty blockers. I truly hope you're getting a cut from Big Pharma for your service to it, since otherwise you're merely one of their useful idiots.

Back on topic.

[Pants-of-dog]

Yes, it would make sense that this was not known two years ago, since that would not have been enough time to conduct the cited studies.

Note that none of the studies showed any safety concern.

[skinster]

Dr Campbell's report on these studies says these side-effects were reported quickly after the vaccine roll-out and since have barely been studied and is asking why after two years they're not looking into it properly, even now. The answer is because they don't want bad news about vaccines just like you don't.

More from him. You should try watching him if you're genuine, rather than sharing boring one-liners any time someone posts something that gives you cognitive dissonance.

[Pants-of-dog]

No, I am not interested in watching boring propaganda pieces by discredited octogenarians.

If there is an argument that can be gleaned from the video, then the person posting it can provide said argument.

[Potemkin]

Some of the women bleeding had stopped getting periods and began getting them again because of the vaccines. But sure sure, the vaccine was safe and effective!

Depopulation agenda? With a mortality rate of between 2% and 3% of those infected? Lol! The human race could replace those sorts of numbers in just a few months. No, if you’re serious about depopulation then you need something with a mortality rate more like 90%, as smallpox was to the Native Americans in the 16th century. Now that was a depopulation agenda which worked!

[Pants-of-dog]

On a pedantic note, there is no evidence that the (very successful) depopulation of the Americas by smallpox was intentional besides one or two isolated incidents.

It was more like a lucky side effect of the European tradition of sleeping with animals.

But yes, if depopulation were to have been the goal, other diseases would have been a lot better.

[skinster]

Depopulation agenda?

The virologist and other doctor are claiming the omnicron virus did not occur naturally and they both appear to be risking their positions at Kyoto University because of their claims. Here's another report on it and here.

Some people think that just because people haven't died already from the vaccine, that it could still happen. I don't go along with that idea but we do know a significant more amount of people have died or got injured from the mRNA vaccines compared to all the others combined, according to VAERS. But that could also be because it is a new experimental tech and wasn't fully tested.

[ingliz]

2% and 3%

Notionally...

If the vaccine was 60% effective.

Then, of the 3 in 100 fated to die, 2 in 100 would have lived.

And being generous, let's say the vaccine killed 2 in 1000.

That's a win, isn't it, if we are just counting the number of dead?

[QatzelOk]

To state that there is going to be another pandemic which will kill millions of people is to state the bleedin’ obvious. Throughout human history, such pandemics have occurred with depressing regularity, and will undoubtedly occur again. What I find mystifying, however, is how they are able to develop a vaccine against a pandemic the origin of which is still unknown.

Perhaps we need to acknowledge that SOME pandemics are not caused by natural events, but were seeded by the powers that be.

It's not like the leaders of human civilizations don't use genocide from time to time to maintain control over their cattle.

[QatzelOk]

...boring propaganda pieces by discredited octogenarians.

...that rapist...

It's amazing how your dry pedantic tone that you use while talking about the joys of dick-chopping... changes to vulgar hate speech whenever any information contradicts your promoting of invasive Pharma products.

Agenda is clear, tactics are pure manipulation without any desire for truth.

Pants-of-Dog strategy explained:

Post non-stop Studies that were funded by the Bill Gates foundation as if they were the word of God.

Trash any contradictory information as rapists, or octogenarian, or anything else that might damage credibility.

It's true that the Gates Foundation has enough money to fund a lot of drug-hasbara and dick-chopping hasbara.

[Pants-of-dog]

People who post videos are lazy.

They refuse to spell out the argument, or the evidence.

They want us yo do all the work for them: watch the video for them, figure out the argument for them, write it iut for them.

No, lazy people should not be rewarded with free work from me.

[QatzelOk]

People who post videos are lazy...

Not always.

In the case of the complexities of medical ethics, it is often easier to explain the issues in a spoken presentation format, rather then a written format. One of the reasons for this is because Studies present raw data, but don't necessarily deconstruct their own methodologies - which is required when Pharma money is funding so many studies.

Cui Bono must be asked after each study, and this means that all medical studies in our day have to be vetted with a fine-tooth comb. Which requires a lot more than cutting and pasting some of the text of these studies like you do. Lazily.

[Pants-of-dog]

Yes, that is another thing.

Studies actually show their methodology, while some random dude in a video could be coming up with whatever random notions they want.

Also, studies are written, so one can read them at their own pace. This makes studies both faster to peruse and more comprehensible for those who need extra time.

[skinster]

Two different manufacturing processes. Pfizer covid vaccines for the clinical trials were mostly produced using manufacturing ‘process 1’ whereas the vaccines used for population vaccination were produced using a different ‘process 2’

Interview with Josh Guetzkow PhD