Independent_Srpska wrote: 
This all idiocy, has nothing to do with the things he says. Those things he said were under oath in the court - so, if you think he lies - you are welcome to prosecute him for lying under the oath.
His role in Tudjman's government was short lived and then he later reverted back to his Yugo-worship and even wanted to form a Tito society, part of which of course includes smearing anything that has to do with the breakup of Yugoslavia. So it's pretty obvious he's a biased liar on anything concerning the breakup. Of course he needs to defend Yugoslavia because he committed war crimes under that regime. No wonder he was kicked out of the government in 1991.
I can't prosecute him since I'm not a prosecutor
, and because what he stated about Yugoslavia being under attack is only an opinion and everyone has the right to his own, even if it has nothing to do with reality.
Of course it does not. If you break constitution - the legal mechanism will take care of you
Obviously it didn't "take care" of anyone in Yugoslavia except the Serbs, since everyone but the Serbs opposed it. Thus if the constitution was opposed by all except one, it lost its purpose in "taking care" of everyone.
If everyone is against the constitution - then everyone changes constitution.
Which is what happened. Everyone left Yugoslavia and changed their constitutions
The Serbs installed their own pro-Milosevic president in Yugoslavia even though a Croat president was supposed to take the turn for presidency. Somehow that tells me that the Serbs had the power in Yugoslavia and that changing the constitution to include the will of others and not just the Serbs would be rather impossible.
That did not happen, instead Croats started killing Serbs.
Lol, as i said, that kind of scenario may have played out on Mars at the time, but not on Earth.
You mean by the Borovo Selo, Dalj, Lovas and Siroka Kula killings in which Serbs killed and massacred 160 Croats before Croats killed or massacred anyone?
Or the Serb bombings of the cities of Zagreb, Karlovac, Zadar, Sibenik, Split, Dubrovnik, Slavonski Brod, Sisak, Osijek, Vukovar and many more, before the Croats bombed anyone?
Or the 170 000 Croats cleansed from one third of Croatia by Serbs 4 years before the Storm you so much whine about where Serbs left on their own anyway?
^According to real world history of course, but I have no doubt the Chetniks have made up their own fairytales where they were the victims while they lined up and shot Croat civilians and unleashed artillery barrages on Croat cities
Peaceful secession had to be agreed
The borders already existed for 45 years, and by the will of the countries whose borders they were for the last 45 years, they continued to exist after the breakup. Croatia, Slovenia, BiH and Macedonia wasn't Serb territory, how ever much land-grabbing Serb imperialists had wet dreams about it, so no one had to ask their permission for being independent in their own countries. ALL of Yugoslavia left except Serbia, in effect what was left was Serbia and not Yugoslavia, and no one called their territory into question, even though there were 90 000 Croats living in Vojvodina, but they never decided to start killing Serbs and take their lands by force as the Serbs did in Croatia and Bosnia.
In fact, exactly Croats refused offered peaceful secession, because peaceful secession of Yugoslavia considered peaceful secession of administrative unit Socialistic Republic Croatia.
Well that's what happened so how did we refuse it? The borders of the Socialist Federal Republic of Croatia are the same as the borders of independent Croatia, it's the Serbs that wanted to violate those borders and put their own which had no basis in anything at all but their own expansionist wishes.
If Croats wanted right to secede from Yugoslavia, Serbs as constituent nation in Croatia and founders of SR Croatia had absolute right to secede from Croatia.
Not really, since all Yugoslav republics agreed to secede within their previous federal borders, while no one ever agreed to the making of new borders based strictly on ethnicity. So they had the absolute right to continue living in Croatia or go to Serbia if they didn't like it. RSK has no basis in anything historical at all anyway, those lands were never part of a Serb state in history and were Croat numerous times in the last 1000 years, 36% of its population were Croats (before they were ethnically cleansed), so if you think the Serbs had the right to secede in Croatia then you also think Albanians have the right to secede Kosovo. You can't have it both ways.
So, Serbs fabricated that Croats violated constitutions of Croatia and Yugoslavia and kicked Serbs out of the Constitution of Croatia as a constituent people? Right? That was not fearful? Or it was just a dream?
No, according to the RSK president Serbs were victims of anti-Croat fear propaganda spread by their leadership that promoted the myth that Croats are out to kill Serbs like in WW2. And the Serbs were not "kicked out of the constitution", that's a notorious lie, their rights as a national minority were protected by the constitution like the hundreds of national minorities in other countries. Serbs were a minority of barely 12% and were made a national minority as such, with national minority rights respected by the constitution, a legitimate move considering their small percentage that post-war revisionists try to justify as the reason for war instead of the actual Serb territorial aspirations.
After the end of WWII - Serbs from Serb Krajina were incorporated in Communist Croatia only under the condition to have a constituent status and veto right on one-sided Croatian nationalistic aspirations. That was essential precondition to join Croatian nazis and butchers with victims, Krajina Serbs, in one communistic administrative unit named SR Croatia.
The Croat nazis and butchers were all tried and exectuted after WW2 by Yugoslavia, and those that fled abroad were assassinated by the secret service, so there was no longer any "nazi threat" for the Serbs in Croatia as all who were left were Croat partisans that kicked the nazi traitor's ass. Thus the elevated status of the Serbs served no purpose anymore but to give the Serbs which were a minority a highly disproportionate share in power, literarly making one Serb worth as a few Croats, again it made them "special".
"Nazi threats" are, like Milan Babić admitted himself, just Serb anti-Croat fear propaganda used to justify and incite the war. The real nazis and ustasa were all dead for decades.
As you said - when Croat violated the contract between peoples who made SR Croatia - Croatia was void.
And Croatia was made by Croats. That's why it was called Croatia. The same Croats that made the first anti-fascist resistence in WW2 near Sisak that defeated the Nazi collaborators and saved the Serbs from them
Basically, you are ignorant.
Yawn
You are boring me with your whiny Serb extremist myths of victimhood and childish name calling. I understand that you're angry that NATO bombed you while you were having fun shelling Bosnian civilians, but please control your fascist Chetnik instincts and have some dignity since we're not in 1991 any more.
Keep on denying the worse crimes and genocide your people committed on the entire continent in the last 70 years, and justifying it by crimes of others far in history for which all responsible have been justly punished.
- By Godstud
- By Rancid
- By FiveofSwords
- By wat0n