- 21 May 2012 07:21
#13966340
Yeah, yeah, typical Ustasha crappy propaganda that we all ready smashed into pieces several times - everything was void, but Croatia...everyone was worthless but Croats...Croats are so worthy that they had all the right to occupy Serbs in Serb territories, Croats had right to kill Serbs even in Bosnia and Herzegovina, dead Serbs are worthless (so, had Croats started killing Serbs first - that's not important, because dead Serbs are worthless), dead Serbs are propaganda, everyone who speaks the truth that is not in accordance to official Croat-ustasha policy he is at least WWII war criminal, communist, or God forbid a Serb, the constitution is not important unless it speaks in favor of Ustashas, if constitution doesn't speak in favor of Ustashas , we Ustashas will say it is a void constitution, so on and on...blah blah blah.....
Dear Mouse, long story short: Croat terrorists and secessionists violated the Constitution of Yugoslavia, then western forces (First Germany then other NATO-fascist countries) supported Croat ustashas in killing Serbs and in ethnic cleansing Serbs from "what-is-today-Croatia"....political influence of NATO-fascists combined with NATO-military aid was stronger than legal and military mechanisms of Yugoslavia, therefore Croat ultra-nationalists managed to destroy Yugoslavia, because Yugoslavia was unable to defend herself. Full stop.
So, all your ustasha nazi rambling is nothing but a so called "thief mentality" - "I stole it - I wasn't caught, therefore I had a legitimacy to stole it "...
roxunreal wrote:Sure RSK, if you say so. I may be Maas as well then, Smilin' Dave and a whole lot of other people on this forum who see your Serb genocide denial for what it is
I think you are a little confused, the constitution of Yugoslavia was void as Yugoslavia didn't exist anymore, by the legitimate and collective will of its peoples. Croats made Serbs a recognised national minority, which they were in the country given their % in the population. Croats in Serbia didn't even have that basic status until 2005 and never attacked anyone, yet somehow the Serbs thought it justified them to start killing and bombing thousands of people, because the Serbs are obviously "special".
So suddenly everyone except the Serbs were terrorists? Sure baby, keep that false cult of victimhood going.
Everyone wanted out except the Serbs. The Serbs were not worth more than everyone else combined so that they had any right to prevent them. The laws of Yugoslavia ceased to exist when Yugoslavia ceased to exist by its own decision. Sorry, Serbia isn't more "Yugoslavia" than Slovenia, Croatia, Macedonia and BiH are (though I have no doubt about your nationalist delusions of being worth more than everyone else combined), thus Serbia had no right to act in the name of Yugoslavia but could only act in the name of Serbia, which it later did when it shifted its focus from pretending to be a guardian of Yugoslavia's existence against everyone's will, to simply dropping the whole pretend act and attempting to make an ethnically pure Greater Serbia come true under the guise of protecting the poor Serbs from the evil Croats and Muslims.
There was no Yugoslav state after everyone left, Serbia was expanding its territory and influences via its pseudo-country parasites in Croatia and BiH and its reborn Chetnik forces that killed thousands. Rest assured if anything in the 90's resembled Hitler's actions it was the Serb conduct across the Balkans that basically said "If we can't be in charge, let's kill all non-Serbs".
1. Serb forces in Croatia that started the "log revolution" harrassment and impairment of connectivity and commerce between parts of Croatia, attempted to cut off the southern part of the country from the north, occupied a third of Croatia and ethnically cleansed all non-Serbs from it which included several massacres such as those in Dalj, Široka Kula, Lovas etc before the Croats committed any atrocity towards the Serbs, this was followed by the Serb bombing of a dozen cities and complete destruction of one along with 1500 of its people. All because Croats made them a recognised national minority which due to their numbers in the country, they were. Well, that's today's excuse anyway, what they really wanted is obvious and had little to do with the lamented constitutional status.
2. Who started the war in BiH? Probably not this guy, right?
On 13 October 1991, Karadzic speaks with Momcilo Mandic : "In just a couple of days, Sarajevo will be gone and there will be five hundred thousand dead, in one month Muslims will be annihilated in Bosnia and Herzegovina".
Just because an admirer of Yugoslavia and a WW2 war criminal said so Gee and here I was thinking you despised war criminals from WW2. This whole bullshit that he thinks Yugoslavia was under attack by peaceful secession of the states that made it up is only his ideological opinion, as is that Croatia was part of Yugoslavia after independence even though such a thing as Yugoslavia didn't exist any more at that time.
Of course one should know more about the person to see where his rhetoric comes from. Knowing he had a falling out with HDZ and his touchy Yugoslav past (read: killing civilians after WW2 as a Yugoslav secret police chief), it's no surprise that he would talk shit about anti-Yu movement. Unfortunately for historical revisionsits, it's well known who seceded peacefully, and who started ethnic cleansing, massacres and bombing cities, which is what war really is. One war criminal and traitor's words won't change the wealth of historical evidence on the contrary.
That's a Serb news/film video so it must be solid unbiased truth right? Of course that's only one side of the story.
The other side is that the innocent civilians in Sijekovac that were armed Serb paramilitaries were later "reclassified" as civilians by RS, not to mention that there are people on that list who died in 1996 after the war (killed by local Serbs) yet they are classified as civilians killed by Croats and Bosniaks in 1992. Apparently others are guilty even when the Serbs kill their own.
Slovenia was an independent state with a foreign army invading its soil in a show of intimidation and dropping threatening propaganda leaflets on its capital city, and acted accordingly. Whine all you like, if anything they should be glad they acted promptly to the very first signs of JNA/Serb things to come, kicked their ass in a great organised operation, and thus avoided the fate of Croatia and Bosnia. At least the Serbs didn't get to fuck up another country.
So my conclusions while talking to you:
Serbs leaving on orders from their own leaders (and not because Croats cleansed them) as Croatia was liberated, and about 500 Serb civilians dead both in fighting and in subsequent reprisals, which were not ordered from above since general Gotovina ordered that no harm must come to remaining Serbs after Storm
^is a worse "crime" than:
12000 killed in barbaric 4-year Siege of Sarajevo, including 1500 children
8300 executed in Srebrenica
- just two of the pearls in the crown of Serb atrocities in Bosnia under innocent Serb heroes like Mladic and Karadzic.
Also, if we can learn anything from the likes of Serb genocide defenders, it's the following:
Always making anti-Serb conspiracies
Croats
Slovenes
Bosniaks
Albanians
Americans
Brits
Germans
Dutch
The Vatican
most of the rest of the world
Always right and innocent, even when killing thousnads of people:
Guess who?
Yeah, yeah, typical Ustasha crappy propaganda that we all ready smashed into pieces several times - everything was void, but Croatia...everyone was worthless but Croats...Croats are so worthy that they had all the right to occupy Serbs in Serb territories, Croats had right to kill Serbs even in Bosnia and Herzegovina, dead Serbs are worthless (so, had Croats started killing Serbs first - that's not important, because dead Serbs are worthless), dead Serbs are propaganda, everyone who speaks the truth that is not in accordance to official Croat-ustasha policy he is at least WWII war criminal, communist, or God forbid a Serb, the constitution is not important unless it speaks in favor of Ustashas, if constitution doesn't speak in favor of Ustashas , we Ustashas will say it is a void constitution, so on and on...blah blah blah.....
Dear Mouse, long story short: Croat terrorists and secessionists violated the Constitution of Yugoslavia, then western forces (First Germany then other NATO-fascist countries) supported Croat ustashas in killing Serbs and in ethnic cleansing Serbs from "what-is-today-Croatia"....political influence of NATO-fascists combined with NATO-military aid was stronger than legal and military mechanisms of Yugoslavia, therefore Croat ultra-nationalists managed to destroy Yugoslavia, because Yugoslavia was unable to defend herself. Full stop.
So, all your ustasha nazi rambling is nothing but a so called "thief mentality" - "I stole it - I wasn't caught, therefore I had a legitimacy to stole it "...
"The Aggressor is the one who attacks before the USA does", Milos Zeman, the Czech President