Up to ~$20 trillion Oil basin discovered in South Australia - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Talk about what you've seen in the news today.

Moderator: PoFo Today's News Mods

#14155234
SOUTH Australia is sitting on oil potentially worth more than $20 trillion, independent reports claim - enough to turn Australia into a self-sufficient fuel producer.

Brisbane company Linc Energy yesterday released two reports, based on drilling and seismic exploration, estimating the amount of oil in the as yet untapped Arckaringa Basin surrounding Coober Pedy ranging from 3.5 billion to 233 billion barrels of oil.

At the higher end, this would be "several times bigger than all of the oil in Australia", Linc managing director Peter Bond said.

This has the potential to turn Australia from an oil importer to an oil exporter.

"If it comes in the way the reports are suggesting, it could well and truly bring Australia back to (oil) self-sufficiency," Mr Bond said.

State Mineral Resources Development Minister Tom Koutsantonis said there were exciting times ahead for SA's resources industry.

"Shale gas and shale oil will be a key part to securing Australia's energy security now and into the future," he said.

Linc has hired Barclays Bank to find an investment partner for the next stage of the project, costing $150-$300 million.

The company aims to drill up to six horizontal wells to further confirm its figures, but Mr Bond is confident the region will be home to oil production.

The need to build another oil and gas hub, like the Santos production facility at Moomba, depends on the size of the discovery.

"If it really takes off, that's when you start to look at Moomba-type pipelines."

Mr Bond said there was the potential for a US-style "shale oil" boom in SA.

The Wall Street Journal reported last week the US could pass Saudi Arabia as the world's largest oil producer this year, thanks to the shale oil explosion.

Shale oil extraction involves using new technologies to drill vertically and then horizontally for distances of more than one kilometre through shale rocks that contain oil.

The process was once prohibitively expensive but advances have created a new oil boom in the US.

Mr Koutsantonis said: "We have seen the hugely positive impact shale projects like Bakken and Eagle Ford have had on the US economy.

"There is still a long way to go, but investment in unconventional liquid projects in South Australia will accelerate as more and more companies such as Linc Energy and Altona prove up their resources."

Mr Bond said the potential in SA was "massive", but even at the lower end of estimates - about 3.5 billion barrels - it was still very large.

"If you look at the upper target, which is 103-233 billion barrels of oil, that's massive," he said.

"The opportunity of turning this into the next shale boom is very real.

"If the Arckaringa plays out the way we hope it will, and the way our independent reports have shown, it's one of the key prospective territories in the world at the moment." Mr Bond said each well could flow at 1000-2000 barrels per day.

"You put in 50 of them and that's a lot of oil," he said. "We have a very good idea that this will be an oil-producing asset."

Mr Bond said Linc had so far spent about $130 million in the Arckaringa Basin, drilling four deep wells and "a couple of dozen" shallower wells.

British company Altona Energy was scheduled to start drilling this month to discover more resources for a proposed coal to liquids and power project also in the Arckaringa Basin.

That project, which could cost up to $3 billion, would involve an open-cut coal mine and possibly a 560 megawatt power plant.

The Linc Energy reports, from consultants DeGolyer and McNaughton and Gustavson Associates, are available on the Australian Securities Exchange website.

http://mobile.news.com.au/business/comp ... 6560401043

Time to transition into prime resource whore. We should use the money to build a giant koala statue from gold.
#14155735
Fasces wrote:Peak oil, peak oil!

:D

Igor Antunov wrote:Time to transition into prime resource whore. We should use the money to build a giant koala statue from gold.

Awful news for Austrialia. While everybody else will be progressing to green energy and technology (and making massive profits, no doubt), Australia will be left behind ... together with the US which is in similarly dire straits.
#14155738
Being a large country with a lot of undeveloped land no doubt means that Australia has a lot of untapped natural resources. This news is entirely unsurprising. Though I guess the Aussies can now complain about the same things people were complaining about the US with fracking - namely continued reliance on fossil fuels. Ah well, enjoy it while it lasts.
#14155802
NICE :D SA but of all jokes no more! time to declare inderpendance dont want those greedy easteners taking all our royalty profits. Hopefully we'll become somthing like UAE with fuel 1cent a Litre, time to get that F350 i always wanted i'll finally be able to afford to put juice in it :D
Those Vics can laugh who's the boss now :D :D

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/sout ... 6560401043
#14155909
I would have thought that Australia is well suited to renewable energy. It has vast areas of sun-drenched and uninhabited territory which are unsuited to agriculture. Widespread domestic solar usage should be viable. It has a huge coastline along which it could harness wind and wave power, with the winds of the south coast in particular being suitable for turbines I believe. Throw in hydro and the potential for geothermal and it's not a bad picture.

I don't see why Australia should seek to damage the environment in the pursuit of shale. Seeing as these minerals belong to the Crown, it should be quite easy to leave them in the ground and tell the oil companies to bugger off.
#14155974
I think that the media have exaggerated this discovery somewhat. It should be pointed out that this is a shale oil field which requires more infrastructure to extract the oil compared to conventional oil. The 223 billion barrels is the upper estimate of recoverable oil from the field, in reality it will be most likely be lower than that.

As for environmental concerns the field is located near the town of Coober Peedy, which has a population of less than 2000 and is located in the middle of the desert. The nearest town is more than 500 kms away.
#14155999
Otebo wrote:I would have thought that Australia is well suited to renewable energy. It has vast areas of sun-drenched and uninhabited territory which are unsuited to agriculture. Widespread domestic solar usage should be viable. It has a huge coastline along which it could harness wind and wave power, with the winds of the south coast in particular being suitable for turbines I believe. Throw in hydro and the potential for geothermal and it's not a bad picture.

I don't see why Australia should seek to damage the environment in the pursuit of shale. Seeing as these minerals belong to the Crown, it should be quite easy to leave them in the ground and tell the oil companies to bugger off.


Because our government is controlled by the mining sector. Even people who have solar power that is put into the grid only get 8 cents back compared to the 23 cents it costs.

Mining holds up our weak economy anyway. it would save the government actually having to think intelligently.

No one would be arrested if protesters did not dis[…]

Nope! Yep! Who claimed they were? What predat[…]

Russia-Ukraine War 2022

It seems a critical moment in the conflict just ha[…]

The Crimean Tatar people's steadfast struggle agai[…]