blackjack21 wrote:The picture that bears the most reasonable relationship to your statement was a black man flying over the car, not a white woman. If there were a picture, it would have made the newspapers. If it bleeds, it leads.
Try the female on the right under the other vehicle.
blackjack21 wrote:I'm not sure what you are talking about.
Are playing coy now, you are aware of the black kid being beat up while the cops watch?https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/25/us/c ... olice.html
And if you read the article, they purposely ignore the pleads for help. Even though they had permits and even though cops are to "protect and serve". Why should blacks waste their tax money(theft in itself), on people that harms them?
blackjack21 wrote:As far as I know, this was not a Tea Party event. It was not organized by them.
Now you're acting stupid, stop it. You admit that the racists there had permits and I said there were also tea party events that also didn't have permits.
You're projecting again, stop it.
blackjack21 wrote:Wanting to kill someone isn't a crime.
So BLM chanting for dead cops isn't criminal nor terrorist, good.
blackjack21 wrote: Beating up someone because they want to kill you is also a crime.
So you admit that: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/25/us/c ... olice.html
Those cops that did nothing and the people that beat up the Black guy committed an criminal act.
blackjack21 wrote:That's how the law works.
It's works when it suit our racist needs.
blackjack21 wrote: I'm saying I didn't see the car hit Heather Heyer
And the autopsy and probably the pic(girl under the car) says otherwise. You don't believe cause it's not in your race war interest because "I'm a racist and I have a problem".
blackjack21 wrote: I don't know the mental state of the driver.https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/on ... f59ef8a7e2
"Weimer said he taught Fields during his junior and senior years at Randall K. Cooper High School in Kentucky. For a class called “America’s Modern Wars,” Fields wrote a deeply researched paper about the Nazi military during World War II, Weimer recalled.
“It was obvious that he had this fascination with Nazism and a big idolatry of Adolf Hitler,” the teacher said. “He had white supremacist views. He really believed in that stuff.”
Fields’s research project into the Nazi military was well written, Weimer said, but it appeared to be a “big lovefest for the German military and the Waffen-SS.”
I think we know his mental state and he wasn't even from Virginia? Now you might have the benefit of the doubt if he was from the town, but he came from Ohio to Virginia? Isn't that wired that he would came there the day of all days which had an event.
blackjack21 wrote:Every other person there is not charged and not considered guilty. So trying to smear everyone there with the actions of one person is shameful.
Like you smear Black Lives Matter when Micah killed 5 cops.
That's shameful, but again "I'm a racist and I have a problem".
Don't you see the irony here? I can say everything you say about James Field to Micah Xavier Johnson and make a better point, due to him not even be apart of BLM and BLM actually condemning the killings. Have the right wing did that?
Not every BLM is not charged and not considered guilty. So trying to smear everyone there with the actions of one person in Dallas is shameful.
blackjack21 wrote: We don't say that all the guests of the Mandalay Bay hotel on October 1st are mass murderers because they shared Stephen Paddock's love of gambling.
Are you seriously making a false equivalence of normal guests enjoying in a secular apolitical entertainment institution to something like the klan?
Are you that stupid?
blackjack21 wrote:So stop trying to smear everyone that was at the event as a murderer.http://fortune.com/2017/08/26/charlotte ... ked-chats/
They also said "White lives matter"(I thought all lives matter) and "Jews won't replace us"(Even though we Whites allow the Jews to do it)
They also associate with KKK, which automatically makes you racist. If Obama somehow associate with Nation of Islam, would you a have giving him a pass, since like you said: " We don't say that all the guests of the Mandalay Bay hotel on October 1st are mass murderers because they shared Stephen Paddock's love of gambling."
We can't say Obama is a racist, just because he share BLM valid points on police.
blackjack21 wrote:Malvo killed many people in a pre-meditated manner.
See how quick you were to judge when he's Black, yet you "wait til more comes up" if he's white. See the hypocrite in action.
Again , I didn't see what transpired before he accelerated, and I don't know the mental state of the shooter.
We don't even know if that really was him. Anyway there's no evidence that he pre-meditated, remember he was https://www.cbsnews.com/news/shrink-mal ... ainwashed/
Which means he was coerce into doing this, he had no choice. He was kidnapped by a crazy Black guy, same as Stephen Paddock(both couldn't be supremacists due to unknown nature of the Stephen(though his family was crazy, so he has health issues) and Muhammad leaving NOI.) We know for a fact that Lee Boyd was a young, inexperience and even the Judges admit it wasn't pre-meditated.
blackjack21 wrote: It's unlikely he will be freed. By the way, the reason it took so long to apprehend them is that the police were racial profiling; that is, law enforcement said they were looking for a white male, but it turned out to be two black men.
That's not racial profiling, it works when it involves another race base on assumption cause remember you said: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... ng-it.html
Also about Malvo: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/pu ... story.html
See the Judge states that he's of stable mind and non-threatening, he even apologize to the deaths. The Law prevails. Has Roof done any of that? Would a pre-meditate person do this? Cause remember pre-meditate is usually an evil intent and planning. Malvo wasn't thinking just following orders of a crazy Black man.
blackjack21 wrote:Propaganda isn't really that effective, especially when the propagandists aren't considered moral actors themselves.
Yes it is, Fox, Alex Jones, Rush (drug addict and dealer) Limblaugh, all make very strong propaganda that make Goebbels gasp. And their "moral acting" gave trump the win.
blackjack21 wrote:We certainly were at war with the Nazis, because they declared war on us.
And you're at war with the Liberals/Establishment cause like Steven Bannon said it they declare war on "us". So it makes sense for you to be as fooled as any redneck.
blackjack21 wrote:FDR's New Deal was in line with a lot of fascist tenets, so I rather doubt that was a reason to oppose Nazism.
By that logic, Germany in 1920 was fascist due to their "tenets" and so was Regan(loved Immigrants and Muslims, called them founding fathers) and Nixon(which you loved, so you're a fascist). You see the stupidity here, boy?
blackjack21 wrote:so I rather doubt that was a reason to oppose Nazism.
Their economics had nothing to due with Nazism.
blackjack21 wrote:That's another peculiar assertion from you, since Malvo and Muhammad were affiliated with the Nation of Islam.
Wrong, Muhammad joined then left. Nation of Islam has nice track record of none-violence(more than the Civil Rights movement). Muhammad than kidnap Boyd and move to some island in Caribbean. They NOI cut all ties, which is why they haven't been shut down. How can you make such general uninformed statement yet said: " the reason it took so long to apprehend them is that the police were racial profiling; that is, law enforcement said they were looking for a white male, but it turned out to be two black men.". I found that statement so specifically odd.
blackjack21 wrote:Right. That's why some of us think the event was staged for political purposes, because the Nazis and KKK hate each other.
Lies: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... ina-racismhttp://www.ydr.com/story/archives/2017/ ... 563511001/
1995 tenn. Again, I bet you never thought of the "Klan and Nazis" hate each other til I said it, and you agreed with me. Gaslighting me, boy?
Let's not forget Klans are not unified group, there's no central base. So one might hate nazis, others accept them. Plus they're willing to unite for a common cause. Meanwhile you yet to give evidence that Nazis and Klanners hate each other.
See I knew you were going to agree with my lie. I baited you and you took it. Reverse Psychology, now I know the next time you speak, you'll be lying.
blackjack21 wrote:Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and their ilk in the Democratic Party that find working class white people deplorable.
Why are you assuming Obama was going after whites if Whites voted for him twice? Are you now changing narrative? See I notice you gaslight one thing, and then another that slightly, only slightly contradict each other. But I thought Obama and Hilary was against minorities as well. You said so yourself Obama/Hilary doesn't benefit minorities, so why are you race baiting on our own race? I thought trump would be beneficial the Dark races as well as ours?
Also the anti-white hilary was going to help decrease our population by these actions: https://www.politicsnc.com/a-marshall-p ... l-america/
Really against us White Christians. But again, I'm anti-state and anti-"corporatism". So if trump cause anarchism, I'll be happy.
blackjack21 wrote: So maybe you could argue that it wasn't staged, and that there really is now some organic alliance of the deplorable coming to get you.
I'm White and 52, I live in Eugene, Oregon. It's heroin town, and I owned many guns. I'll be safe.
blackjack21 wrote:Industrialist? Yes. Scientific? Yes. Capitalist? No so much.
They were capitalist, what they had was something akin to FDR New Deal but a bit radical. Not as radical as any socialist state, but it had private property. If Nazi Germany wasn't capitalist than China is socialist.
blackjack21 wrote:They killed Gregor Strasser's followers, yes. They also killed conservatives and anti-Nazi establishment figures like Kurt von Schleicher.
So you can't say they're Socialist Volkish, if they killed socialists.
blackjack21 wrote:That's why it is absurd to conflate Nazis and conservatives. They were worlds apart.
Another gaslight tactic you and conservatives use in debate arguments is put words in your opponent mouth. When did I said that?
blackjack21 wrote:This Nazi = KKK = Conservative narrative only makes sense to Millennials with a politically charged history education long on left wing politics and short on facts.
They all support trump and have racial biases, are they really short on facts? Explain why Blacks that live in republican south(away from liberal gun violent cities mind you) vote for the democratic plantation, instead of the "Black man's party"? Why is the "Black man's party" so white? Why is the "Black Man Party" have members like steve king who say anti-black words and have a confederate flag (symbol of the democrat party, who founded the KKK)? Or that republican who got shot by a real life "Walter Soback" who call himself "david duke without the baggage"? Ain't that something?
blackjack21 wrote:Obama could hardly be characterized as Hitler in any meaningful way.
Except lots of our southern and midwest kin call him that(ironic since Hitler would benefit us and they would love him) but politics right?
blackjack21 wrote:It could be said that he abused power in ways Nixon could only dream of. It could be said his fondness for spying on Americans exceeded that of the East German Stasi.
Could be, but he just inherit the Stasi from the occupation admin of before(Bush). Can you blame him from wanting to stop terrorism? You said so yourself: secure borders, well Obama deported more than Trump and Bush will ever do. How is he anti-white? He did our job.
Why is wrong when Obama does it, but good when trump does it? Unless you're a racist.
blackjack21 wrote:I'm not sure how you would conflate BLM and the KKK, excepting that some elements of both are inclined to violence.
Except I didn't, you probably did last year though. I wouldn't know, I came in last month.
And the actual racists would project and gaslight to compare the two. Like police/trump's "both sides".
blackjack21 wrote:I know you are trying to make a point with some of these remarks, but I find myself not quite understanding.
Aren't we the superior Anglo-Saxon race? Shouldn't we be able to learn our language and decode our hidden meaning? How can we unite as a race, if we can't even understand each other?
blackjack21 wrote: Obama supporters would never leave him and then join a white supremacist organization.
Why not if Weev can go to jail as a liberal and come out a Nazi, straight out of Malcolm X bio; why not? You said so yourself:
blackjack21 wrote: Barack Obama and their ilk in the Democratic Party that find working class white people deplorable.
So why can't our Blood and Kin be "red pilled" as our future youth would say? And you said "Former" as in they saw the lies and join the truth.
Why did you goalpost?
blackjack21 wrote: An example is Drlee who calls himself a Republican, but every policy prescription he pushes is from the Democratic party.
So 1950-70s republican right? Or Theodore Roosevelt(Damn Good President) party? What's wrong with Dem policies?
blackjack21 wrote:Like Hillary Clinton, he offered no condolences to those killed in Las Vegas and instead pushed gun control.
Except he did and she did. Must I bring sources? It'll be stupid for Hillary not to. And gun control is part of condolences. So no more of white women and children be killed. You care about our women and children right?
blackjack21 wrote: Another example is how you keep signing up under different guises.
Really, this like the third time people accuse me of this EM fellow. I think he's some kind of folk tale in this site.
blackjack21 wrote: You used to be the black King of Ethiopia--Tewedros III, I believe.
What's wrong with Blacks being proud of their race? I'm proud of mines.
blackjack21 wrote: Today, you are a self-loating white man, which I suppose is part and parcel of the left wing idea that you can change your gender or race identity at will.
LOL! What's it you trying to say Freud? My name is Sammy Wolff, I'm an anarcho-capitalist. I'm 52 years old, born in 1965. I'm anti-republican and anti-trump. God, Guns and Bacon is my philosophy. I guess you can call me a John Brown of sorts(what happens when people actually follow the whole Bible). I love my race and history and I love it so much that I will scold them from doing the wrong thing. Do not confuse me for a tumblr like SJW. Just cause I condemn bullshit from our race doesn't make me one to give non-whites bullshit a pass. I will be the first one to condemn racism "on both sides". Would you?
Also alot of fascists/russians are also racially and sexually confuse: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/ ... er-accounthttp://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/ ... black-face
Looks like the conservatives were right: Russians/Facists/Socialists/Trumpsters are lefties.
blackjack21 wrote:You folks are like clock work.
blackjack21 wrote:I don't consider the police a race.
Why you call Obama racist, when he criticized the police?
blackjack21 wrote:In fact, BLM's goal of inspiring people to shoot police officers has lead to many non-white police officers being shot (and some fatally) by BLM supporters.
Name any examples and I mean members and I'll give also example of "both sides" killing cops. I can do this all day.
Also you can't deny BLM is racist.
blackjack21 wrote:I did not condemn the attacks in any political sense as I was waiting to hear more about the case first, but I did not find them amusing as many of you did.
Probably so, but then again you're a wired like that. I'll give you some benefit of doubt due to me being here late October.
But what do you mean "many of you did"? I wasn't here therefore I don't apply to that. But how can you call that they(who are white) enjoy other whites deaths? Again though, if you people defend killers in Virginia, why can't they do the same? You have no moral standard.
blackjack21 wrote:In fact, I was probably the first to say it was not likely Muslims, as the attack was on a country music concert that was more likely filled with Christians, Republicans, gun owners and Trump supporters.
Muslims commit random terror attacks regardless of place and time. http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/25/us/tennes ... index.html
This Black Muslim wanted revenge and he was in hick country.
Muslims are usually brave enough to kill people even with guns and in enemy territory.
blackjack21 wrote:Hence, if it were indeed political, it probably pointed to some anti-Trumper. We still don't know.
We already know, he's a WIE(White Identity Extremist) just letting loose.
blackjack21 wrote: the story doesn't make sense
Yes it does, it makes perfect sense. He was insane and killed people. You're trying to gaslight again.
blackjack21 wrote:the perpetrator is dead or mentally ill.
He's dead. Why are you being alex jones?
blackjack21 wrote:The government behaved in strange ways in both cases. So I suspect that there's government involvement.
blackjack21 wrote:Why were the CIA and FBI upset with Trump regarding the JFK papers?
National security, of course. Listen to our white brother in government, our side won the election.
blackjack21 wrote: Clearly, it's because Oswald was trained by the US military in intelligence/counter-intelligence and then worked (indirectly) for the CIA and FBI.
He was alone , and he obviously was a bit too loyal to the communist cause. Besides they could have killed Ike as well, he was the one warning about military-industrial complex. I'm not buying your crazy tales. But again anything for the race war(a society with out Blacks) But the one thing that proves he wasn't a fbi/cia plant is exactly what you said. WHY WOULD THEY KEEP TRACES OF DOCUMENTS!? Any FBI/CIA that had any little evidence of their involvement would be blacklisted and killed. They would also eradicate all traces of their involvement. ALL OF IT! There's no way in hell they'll keep it, that would be the most stupid thing they ever do. So it can't be them, they wouldn't allow it to exist.
Also look at this: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/ret ... years-ago/
More evidence to light. It can't be them, it has to be something we least expect.
blackjack21 wrote:I'm not certain in either case, as I said. I don't think the Las Vegas story will last long at all, principally because the shooter used to work for the post office, then the IRS, then the federal Defense Contract Agency and then for one of the constituent companies of Lockheed Martin. The FBI was guarding the house of one of the Mandalay Bay employees; yet, someone broke into Stephen Paddock's house. The hard drive is missing from his computer. The FBI guards a Mandalay Bay employee's house, but not the suspect in mass murder case with 59 deaths and over 500 injuries? Again, it is implausible. Paddock hadn't worked in 30 years, but has all this money? I just am not buying the story.
Give me links or you're full tinfoil.
blackjack21 wrote:Well, you could just say that I'm a libertarian.
No you're a white racialist. Also you don't believe women should vote.
blackjack21 wrote:That is, I think people should be free and have the capacity to contract.
Said nothing about the Black man using his "free" to contract business. Remember "I'm racist and I have a problem"
blackjack21 wrote: I do not believe in equality other than before the law as the left does.
You're making up cowshit now? Projection.
blackjack21 wrote:I think egalitarianism is a ludicrous proposition.
Give me a definition of that and I decide if it's ludicrous.
blackjack21 wrote: The rest of left wing ideology holds no appeal to me.
Explain why? I'm ancap, but why the concept of Blacks having equal rights "not appealing" ? Cause remember: The law is what we decide, not what the law states.
blackjack21 wrote:Why don't you change your moniker to "Egalitarian353" so that it is at least believable?
Cause I believe in objective freedom, something akin to the wild west. I believe in not hindering Blacks and minorities their right of life/liberty and pursuit of happiness. But apparently you do.
Say it with me "I'm racist and I have a problem".
"Robert Mueller is superb choice to be special counsel. His reputation is impeccable for honesty and integrity. Media should now calm down"-Newt Gingrich