[ness31]

I don’t know if anyone has mentioned this already, but has the lady in Tehran whose image went viral been found? I read reports she’d gone missing. Any truth to that?

[noir]

You can never know in these sort of disputes which are basically a buttle of narratives. The struggling side has an interest to exaggerate and make the story to stay on the headline as much as possible. One way or the other, the story did helped to generate some changes.

[skinster]

You guys need to post links for the claims you make because most people might not have any idea what you're pretending to care about.

[noir]

@ness31

[ness31]

That’s disappointing. I hope she’s ok.

[skinster]

I can't find much online about her whereabouts or really anything about her besides the protest pic/videos.

This tweet though:

[ness31]

I thought I read something about her being a lawyer, but I may have been skimming too fast..

[noir]

It doesn't mantion if she's married. A single mom in Iran is probably tough life. They may have regard her as social unfit. She may have depression. Her action is so hair raising.

[skinster]

While you pretend to care for her, noir, you should remember that she's very likely an anti-zionist.

[noir]

The suffering of the Iranian women

[Beren]

So the biggest issue with Iran is that from a Western point of view it sucks to be a woman there? Wearing a hijab must be terrible indeed, but they shouldn't envy Western women during the sexual harassment epidemic, and any woman can be catcalled anytime while they make less money than men!

And German support keeps the regime alive, of course...

[noir]

What makes this story political important is the way it highlights the Islamic penetration through international bodies. The OIC is commanding the UN human rights committee, thus avoidining any debate about anything that is harmful to Islamic interest, making it unhuman rights. This protest has no chance in the current UN, therefore it must be backed by social media.

It seems there is a difference between some Iranian women (most are socialized to go along with the rules and wear it without fuss) who revolting against the lack of freedom of choice and Muslim women in the West who are more than happy to wear it as defiance.

A Muslim woman in the West can avoide it (theoretically). Moreover, with the reIslamization and radicalization of the Muslims in the West, wearing hijab is political statement. Linda Sarsour, the chief Islamist propagandist in America and one of the organizers of Women March is connected to Islamic Brotherhood, so her choice to sport it is probably genuine and voluntarily. For Islamic Brotherhood agents in the west, the Hijab is extension of hijra (jihad by migration) and daawa (proselytism). These women in Iran couldn't care less about Islamic supremacy in the world.

[Beren]

Western women are sexually harassed on a regular basis while they make less money than men and can be catcalled anytime.

So who cares if women have to wear a hijab in Iran?

[noir]

Hijab in the West has different meaning. The "peaceful" jihad

[Beren]

We used to care about trumpeting democracy, hardcore human rights violations, etc., but what do we have now? Hijab!

[noir]

Who knew? Unbeknown to almost everybody until today, February 1st is apparently World Hijab Day. The left Islamist alliance is changing the Western civilization

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/02 ... isting-it/

[Decky]

Who knew? Unbeknown to almost everybody until today, February 1st is apparently World Hijab Day. The left Islamist alliance is changing the Western civilization

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/02 ... isting-it/

All lies, it is the religious right who push this shit onto people, the left stamp it out.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hujum

Hujum (Russian: Худжум; in Turkic languages, storming or assault, from Arabic: هجوم) was a series of policies and actions taken by the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, initiated by Joseph Stalin, to try to have women in the Muslim majority areas of the Soviet Union remove their veils. The hujum was literally an "attack" on all manifestations of perceived gender inequality, especially on the archaic systems of female veiling and seclusion, practiced in Central Asia.[1] Thus the party recast their message of class revolution into the novel lexicon of women's liberation. By abolishing the means of oppression apparent in Uzbekistan, and heralding in women's liberation, the Soviets believed they could clear the way for the construction of socialism. The hujum campaign's purpose was to rapidly change the lives of Uzbek women so that they may participate in public life, paid work, education, and ultimately membership in the Communist Party. It was originally conceived to enforce laws that gave women in patriarchal societies equality by creating literacy programs and bringing women into the labor force.

I really don't know why I bother anymore. The right live in a version of reality that exists only in their head. This imaginary alliance between the left and Muslims is a classic example. I have a video that might help you Noir.

[noir]

Word Hijab Day is a fruit of the left Islamic alliance. The Muslim tactic is to conquer the Western open space. They are very sophisticated. The left is useful idiot

In Sweden, celebrating Islamic visibility

[Beren]

Word Hijab Day is a fruit of the left Islamic alliance. The Muslim tactic is to conquer the Western open space. They are very sophisticated.

Maybe you should learn from them.

Is this really the best pretence against Iran right now?

[noir]

That's the irony. But fighting for visibility is very sophisticated and effective tactic. They believe the Iranian protest will die down after all the MSM doesn't bother with it.