Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...
Moderator: PoFo Today's News Mods
ingliz wrote:Why?
A pro-Soviet puppet was ruling North Korea; a pro-US puppet was in charge of the South. The pro-US puppet cut his strings and made preparations to invade the North gambling that the US would have no choice but to back him. The pro-Soviet puppet was not stupid and struck first, gambling that the Soviets would have no choice but to back him.
Result: Proxy War : 2.5 million dead.
By the bye, I notice a Baltic state has sided with the UK, and is busy escalating the current crisis, gambling that NATO will send troops to the Russian border.
This sworn Court evidence direct from Porton Down is utterly incompatible with what Boris Johnson has been saying. The truth is that Porton Down have not even positively identified this as a “Novichok”, as opposed to “a closely related agent”. Even if it were a “Novichok” that would not prove manufacture in Russia, and a “closely related agent” could be manufactured by literally scores of state and non-state actors.
This constitutes irrefutable evidence that the government have been straight out lying – to Parliament, to the EU, to NATO, to the United Nations, and above all to the people – about their degree of certainty of the origin of the attack. It might well be an attack originating in Russia, but there are indeed other possibilities and investigation is needed. As the government has sought to whip up jingoistic hysteria in advance of forthcoming local elections, the scale of the lie has daily increased.
On a sombre note, I am very much afraid the High Court evidence seems to indicate there is very little chance the Skripals will ever recover; one of the reasons the judge gave for his decision is that samples taken now will be better for analysis than samples taken post mortem.
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives ... ical-liar/
ingliz wrote:By the bye, I notice a Baltic state has sided with the UK, and is busy escalating the current crisis, gambling that NATO will send troops to the Russian border.
B0ycey wrote:I'm no fan of how Israel became a state noir, but I do find the 'you are with us or against us' dialogue pathetic. Even the Anglo project state of Israel wants to distance itself from this case until stronger evidence is presented. Seems logical. So the UK are actually isolated on this. They are getting a modest lip service and no commitment. They are such fools. Comparing the World Cup to the Nazis Olympics was enough for me to want BoJo to get the sack... again! Could there be a worse foreign minister out there than this jester? I think not.
Suntzu wrote:The Russian scientist who developed the toxin said that the spy and his daughter were essentially dead, there is no antidote.
JohnRawls wrote:We are. It is a win situation for us unless Russia is pushed too far. It is my opinion as of late. Currently pushing Russia further might agravate it and force it to use unreasonable measures.
Atlantis wrote:You don't get it. The plot is to say: the nation is in danger, Russia attacks Britannia with chemical weapons, "we need allies" (Boris Johnson), now we need EU support ... This is the platinum-plated golden bridge for the hard-core Brexshitters to walk back into the EU.
Unfortunately (from my point of view), the EU will play along, because Brexit is just too much trouble for everyone. I just hope the UK will stop short of full-membership. As long as Westminster doesn't have its veto in Brussels, I'm willing to accept the inevitable.
noir wrote:How it's safer together? Open borfers make it safer? The European Union is a 1970s solution to a 1940s problem, today we have diffrent problems
Until Europe create this EU Army we hear so often on here
Seeker8 wrote:Why do these brexit people always mention this? and they never explain why they have a problem with it. Seems like a good idea to me, what's the difference between that and NATO anyway?
Seeker8 wrote:Why do these brexit people always mention this? and they never explain why they have a problem with it. Seems like a good idea to me, what's the difference between that and NATO anyway?
And @noir, unlike those weirdo alt right people you quote, we are more concerned about defense vs superpowers than we are with a few Muslim refugees.
noir wrote:@Seeker8
Don't know who are the "alt right", the working class voices should be heard whatever their title. Also, if you familiar with European history, then what is called today progressive and mainstream was once held only by far right and neo nazis. The transformation is so striking that few Brits know that until the early seventies only the neo Nazis supported the Arab cause. Today it's proud ideology by Corbyn and ilk.
Have some doubts about "Generation Identity", it seems they are idological inheritors of what was called in the 70's and 80's as "New Right", at that time they were pro Arab too, and it's very much possible that in the future they will be allies again, forming new fascist political center. Rigt now they are protesting about immigration but what will happen when the Muslims will stop to be "immigrants". They will adjust to it. Europe and even the world will be exploded once again by renewed Islamo German militarism. The German stream of this movement is not reliable.
Seeker8 wrote:You're from Israel right? i get the feeling all your posts are simply aimed getting people in Europe to stop taking the Palestinians side. Is that all you actually care about?
I'm not aware of a single country that seriously […]
Britain: Deliberately imports laborers from around[…]