GandalfTheGrey wrote:I'm curious, has any journalist actually asked Theresa May or any other members of the government who are levelling accusations against Russia - a) what is the evidence linking this alleged attack to Russia and b) why won't you produce it?
There is no 'evidence' that it was a Russian operation, the chemical formulae is an open 'secret' that Porton Down could produce with common chemicals in it's inventory.
It could then show it to any half-wit 'Tory' Minister to use as propaganda against Russia in order to boost 'Defence' spending in this period of 'Austerity '(for some).
It would then use that FAKE concocted 'evidence' to pull the wool over the eyes of any country that simply doesn't need any 'evidence' in order to join the daisy chain of FAKE political protest against Russia & Mr PUTIN.
The idea that Porton Down has a system in place that prohibits any production of such chemical concoctions is laughable.
I bet that NOT ONE OF THOSE COUNTRIES BACKING THE Theresa MAY CASE AGAINST RUSSIA HAS SEEN A SCINTILLA OF EVIDENCE AGAINST THEM.
The process of the LAW has NOT been allowed to proceed using proper 'evidence' gathering by the Police, the whole scene of the 'crime' was contaminated by the Police themselves & the military.
This government has judged & prosecuted the case against RUSSIA 'BEFORE' ANY 'evidence' has been produced.
We know that from the utterances of this 'government' & Jeremy CORBYN should have stuck to his position on the processing of the case.
There would NEVER be a chance of any fair trial, either against RUSSIA, or any individual,because of 'planted' 'evidence' ,'tampering' or 'production' of 'FAKE' 'evidence', last but not least ,'trial-by-media' & political involvement.
The legal system of this country dictates a strict compliance with the legal procedures in any 'potential' criminal case,'Police and Criminal Evidence' Act 1984 (PACE).
As yet, there is no compliance with the rule codes in respect of this case, for the simple reason that no evidence which can be used in a court case, has been produced, neither has any link been shown that connects that FAKE 'evidence' to any individual.
Which is why Boris Johnston, Theresa MAY et al are all purveyors of 'FAKE' 'intelligence' & 'evidence' in this case