(1) If you go to other countries, you will see people literally living hand to mouth in a state of perpetual poverty but without much in the way of violent crime. One of the biggest differences between a Korean "ghetto" (though it is had to say such a thing exists) and an American one is that the worst thing that'll happen to you in the Korean version is that they'll try to sell you sex or get y ou to gamble everywhere, and all the men work as very cheap labor and maybe occasionally drive around a Bongo truck and steal bicycles.
Dude, you clearly haven't been to a Korean ghetto and yes, they exist. Furthermore, intense poverty always leads to violent crime. You just don't hear about violent crimes in Korea due to poverty since you listen to Korean news. Also gambling is something the Yakuza do and they certainly are very violent.
Poverty doesn't make people kill each other and rob each other blind. It might make people do worst things in general, sure, but that's not the case.
http://open.lib.umn.edu/sociology/chapt ... l-poverty/https://www.economist.com/international ... f-violenceYes, it does make them more violent overall. You just hear about black crimes more than Korean or Indian crimes. You just don't care about Korean or Indian crimes because you are biased and think such crimes don't exist.
(2) Why wouldn't the shooter be unhinged if she shot an unarmed black man in his home while he was making no threatening moves? How could you do that and not have a mental issue or some weird tick?
"Why wouldn't a black shooter be unhinged if she shot a bunch of unarmed bank attendants while they were making no threatening moves? How could you do that and not have a mental issue or some weird tick?"
You know, the Somali Muslim cop in America who shot and killed an Australian woman for no apparent reason was kept on the police force. He was mentally unhinged even though he never did something so dramatic to show it, and nobody doubts the fact that he was off his rocker when he shot the woman.
Well you certainly do given that you think that poverty doesn't lead to violent crime and that, by extension, lead's to the argument that such people commit violent crimes (explicitly blacks) because of genes or some stupid edgelord crap like that.
Robert Spencer wrote a very good piece about this recently o'er at PJ Media.
The minute you've mentioned an Islamophobe with zero historical knowledge is when you've lost all credibility.
Yeah, black people can be insane and disturbed, and they can be violent. And white people can be the same.
This contradicts your earlier statements about poverty not leading to violence which implies that the people who do act violent due to poverty are doing so because of innate behavior within their genes.
IDK, are we actually discussing this or are you just throwing the kitchen sink of leftist accusations at me?
I'm an Iranian. I don't operate on that political spectrum.