Rancid wrote:Yea, I do have to say that the insinuation that he was a US journalist is a mistake.
Also, he was only a Washington Post contributor (i.e. guest columnist) as far as I can tell, meaning he wasn't really a regular/full time writer/employee for them.
NOne the less, there's no evidence of his death at all. The images don't prove anything! Where's the evidence the Saudis did it?
Khashoggi was a resident of America, that alone gives him protection.
There is 'evidence' of him being tortured & killed at the Saudi Consulate, where he was lured into that situation, by being made to collect his divorce papers from that location.
He was lured to that location, where he was abducted, tortured & murdered through extrajudicial state sponsored killing.
The Turkish government have the evidence necessary to prove the case, they have the circumstantial evidence, they have electronic intelligence.
You do NOT need to be inside a building to witness such things, intelligence equipment is highly sophisticated & almost invisible to the eye.
There are cameras that see through solid brick walls, combined with AV recordings that are forensically analysed.
Also, why would someone who has the intention of only collecting divorce papers, NOT leave that building once he had entered it?
In America, the above evidence would be deemed sufficient to arrest & prosecute a case.
The relationship that America has is not one of shared morals, how can it be, it is one of oil money that America has to buy back from $ TRILLION's spent on Arab oil, by selling arms to the Saudi, in order to balance it's trade account & influence abroad in that part of the world.
It's no accident that those two countries do not implement the UDHR, because it cramps their style of politics.