Rutger Bergman vs Tucker Carlson in Unaired interview - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Talk about what you've seen in the news today.

Moderator: PoFo Today's News Mods

#15084111
Time to bring forth what is problematic (these media are owned by billionaires who don't want to pay what needs to be paid):





If you don't know how to live on an amount of money that is reasonable? Something wrong with you. Got to study your psychology.
#15084119
No, he did not choose to not air the show. Carlson decided not to air it. It threatened to expose him for the dipshit lapdog to the Murdoch empire for what he is. He is supposed to be patting Carlson on the back and he doesn't. He tells him that as a Fox News Anchor he is a millionaire and the reason he is a millionaire is by not talking about taxing wealthy people hiding their money in tax havens. Didn't you read the final part where Tucker Carlson says he did not air it because he found it personally offensive? He found it personally offensive because Bregman told him...."You are a lapdog of the Billionaire class. All of you want to protect your money. You won't discuss what the vast majority of the American people want to discuss."

Tucker is playing a false role of wanting to criticize the global elite by being another Trump painting himself as the common Joe worker but really being a millionaire ass kisser of corporations and trying to convince young people who don't know who to believe and confuse the narrative. For people like Bregman and many others? It is unconvincing and insulting.

He kicked Carlson's ass. A good thing. That is why he called him a moron. BTW, the views for this piece are 2,5 million views. Lol.
#15084181
Tainari88 wrote:This is the segment that Tucker Carlson found brave and wanted to exploit to paint himself as Mr. Equality. No, Tucker is a little lapdog of the Billionaire tax dodgers.




I found Rutger Bergman to be far and away the weakest member of that panel. He seems a little too wrapped up in his own brilliance to be able to listen to anyone else. Those talking about a need for unionism have a better real world understanding of the problem. The claim that it is “taxes, taxes, taxes” is so simplistic that Godstud could have been the one saying it.

Regarding the Tucker interview, that was a wasted opportunity to build some bridges between people. Instead he choose to squander the opportunity with some partisan point scoring. I guess his motive was to earn street cred with his fellow socialists and foster his image in his quest to become a cult leader. As he is a utopian socialist, he knows, we all know, his vision is fancy and his best bet for real world achievement is as a cult leader of the gullible.

A few points, if Tucker is a millionaire and therefore not to be trusted, Bernie is also a millionaire. Why trust him if not for reasons of partisanship? Furthermore, the same charges of being a lapdog of the plutocracy can be levelled at Sanders.

Again, his charges again Fox also apply to other MSM. Why the partisanship? Of course he can’t afford to alienate himself from the mainstream left if he wants his cult following. He must cultivate the right image.

The guy is a snake oil salesman. But then, socialists typically are. Politics is about the problem of distribution : who gets what, when and how. But someone has to make those decisions. The socialist claims the problem with distribution is that bad people are in charge. He then laments the lack of moral concern for economic questions. Finally he proposes himself, having established his ‘moral concern’ to be the legitimate decider of how resources are to be allocated. But at no point does he say how he will be held accountable for his choices.

I suspect Bergman doesn’t want people like Tucker involved with the solution because people like Tucker will call Bergman out when he tries to exploit his position of power. Socialists are very jealous of their power for this reason. They don’t want to be accountable.
#15084188
@foxdemon Simple but accurate. You can't fathom that, as you are looking for some complex conspiracy theory to explain it all.

foxdemon wrote:A few points, if Tucker is a millionaire and therefore not to be trusted, Bernie is also a millionaire. Why trust him if not for reasons of partisanship? Furthermore, the same charges of being a lapdog of the plutocracy can be levelled at Sanders.
Bernie is not employed with as media company owned by a billionaire, with an agenda. There was not mention of "trust", so that's a strawman.

foxdemon wrote:Again, his charges again Fox also apply to other MSM. Why the partisanship?
He was speaking to Tucker Carlson, a Fox News pundit. Were you not paying attention?

foxdemon wrote:Furthermore, the same charges of being a lapdog of the plutocracy can be levelled at Sanders.
They could, but they'd be inaccurate, as Sanders isn't calling for support of the plutocracy.

foxdemon wrote:The guy is a snake oil salesman. But then, socialists typically are.
And because you don't agree with him, you go straight to denigration and calling him a socialist. You do not know what a socialist is. You probably think I am one. :roll:

Nice fact for you McCarthyism types: The Golden Age of Capitalism in USA was when taxes were the highest.

You're fine with economic redistribution going to the rich, but not back the other way.

Tucker is part of the problem. Accepting his part in that would have been too honest for him, though.
#15084204
@foxdemon the problem is that the Right like you are? Are afraid of the change in dialogue. There has been a shift in where the younger generations are going. It is not about Wall Street and capitalism is the best thing since sliced bread anymore. It is about the reality that there has to be a new restructuring of society. Your greed filled banker shit society is not sustainable. It is coming to an end. People are going to have to insist on not being exploited. The uber rich hate the idea.

You exploiting pieces of shit need to change. That is what is happening. People are not going to be with flat wages, worried about health care and worried about hurricanes, tornadoes. debt and austerity because the GREEDY bankster class insists that is what the majority has to endure because the wealth has to stay in elitist hands. Tucker is like most of the anchors in Fox News. Sellout, brown nosing flip flopping, pieces of empty shit who want to be rich and never discuss why the middle class has disappeared and the promised health care never arrived, and the infrastructure never got fixed and you have a lying conman killing people everyday with incompetence in the pursuit of personal enrichment on the public dime.

You don't want to pay taxes if you are rich. Why? I will hazard a guess for all the rich fucks out there? Because you are selfish, you wan't to keep your money because it makes you be able to control a lot of people. We are talking manipulative personalities, who are control freaks, and who are greedy and narcissistic and they are incapable of thinking about the needs of the many versus the need of the one. They crate policy to favor themselves only and are harming the future of many generations of youth. And of working adults who will never be able to have a decent standard of living.

The state needs to be in the hands of people whot are not wealthy. That weak ass argument foxdemon about Sanders being wealthy? Lol. He got to be a millionaire selling a best selling book. Our Revolution. Lol. By writing he did it. He did not do it lying and stealing and being a piece of shit conman like that fool. Before the book his net worth was about 500k. What an old broken down house is worth in a historic neighborhood in Downtown Denver, Colorado. Lol. You can't buy much in NYC with that.

No, Foxdemon, you are going to be facing some real challenges ahead. The selfish tax dodgers are going to have to cry and have their bank accounts emptied. I rejoice on the day that the Koch Brothers and all their cronies like the Murdochs who want the women anchors on Fox to suck their dicks or not be able to report the news and who are proud right wing subservient pieces of immorality......finally are confronted with their lack of ethics and pathological inhumane GREED.

Fuck the greedy Right wing freaks! Your time is coming!
#15084233
Dear me @Tainari88 . You seem to have gotten out of the wrong side of bed today.

I am quite sure there will be a lot of societies being restructured around the world in the coming decade. Most will fail. Nothing has ever come of utopian socialism. In fact socialism generally seems to struggle to deliver the goods. Unless it copies capitalism, as per China.


Socialism boils down to a tribal appeal to take the stuff of those excluded from the tribe. The in group is all good and the out group is all bad. The out group did injustice to the in group therefore the in group can justify killing the out group and taking their stuff.

The problem comes when there are no more wealth creators to rob. Then everyone starves. Well, except for the elite class who decides how resources are distributed.

Wait, don’t tell me. Socialism just hasn’t been done right yet.
#15084256
foxdemon wrote:Dear me @Tainari88 . You seem to have gotten out of the wrong side of bed today.

I am quite sure there will be a lot of societies being restructured around the world in the coming decade. Most will fail. Nothing has ever come of utopian socialism. In fact socialism generally seems to struggle to deliver the goods. Unless it copies capitalism, as per China.


Socialism boils down to a tribal appeal to take the stuff of those excluded from the tribe. The in group is all good and the out group is all bad. The out group did injustice to the in group therefore the in group can justify killing the out group and taking their stuff.

The problem comes when there are no more wealth creators to rob. Then everyone starves. Well, except for the elite class who decides how resources are distributed.

Wait, don’t tell me. Socialism just hasn’t been done right yet.


No Foxdemon that is all justifications for people with no real understanding of how wealth is centered on human beings' abilities and human beings' needs---and their relationships with each other and to nature. The source of all the wealth.

As a socialist, inclusion is vital. Like Jane Goodall talks about in the Davos video, she is inclusive of all human needs and abilities because that is what an intelligent naturalist does. They study primates and the animal kingdom their whole lives and see connections. Connections vital to nature, to each other in many nations and to the need to preserve the world for future generations. Goodall is logical, rational and also emotionally whole in thinking. Love and compassion and logical reasoning and study her entire life of ecosystems and the role primates have in that system? Has made her in her old age conclude that inclusion of all groups as necessary in the natural order is key. But notice what she stated Foxdemon? The ones who are creating these problems? Are disconnected and are not understanding why they need to change.

You are one of the disconnected thinkers Foxdemon. You love to paint the socialists as failures and capitalists as the only stupid alternative? It is not. Capitalism emerged from a human system moving out of feudalism and slavery. Capitalism is a step above that. But there are other concepts that are better than this rapacious capitalism creating imbalances in nature and forcing a reaction to the system that says you got to consume, demand, sell and allow most of the wealth to be controlled by these low consciousness people because they are right and their needs and wants as a small elite class all over the world is paramount and takes precedence over the needs of the many. They don't. They never will. And we can't afford the mess they are making without even talking about what the majority want to happen anymore. No more conformity with the injustice. That is something you are going to have to accept. The Right has to accept change. It is coming whether you like it or not. By the nonaction and nonchoices the global elites have done.

@foxdemon you are condescending and patronizing and very complacent with the state of affairs in the world. I can think you might be deeply discriminatory or classist. But I think you are just uninformed about many things. Lol.

No, Foxdemon I did not wake up on the wrong side of the bed. I joined a website that has a lot of Aussies, British, English speaking people who dialogue and debate like the Dutchman historian Rutger Bregman. I am not Dutch, English or British or Aussie. That is not my style of being expressive in political debates. I have news for you? Diversity of cultural expression. I am Latin American and passionate as can be about political stances. Anyone who is not in the Latin nations of America would FAIL at being any kind of leader, or writers or any kind of communicator in that culture if one is not passionate about the reasons for the disagreement with other political philosophies. Passion is my style and the style of my culture. You think it is about the loss of control or lack of argument because you come from a different cultural matrix than I do. It has nothing to do with that. It has to do with Latinos hating boring oration. Or speech that is flat like Bregman's matter of fact deliveries. No, we dance, we sing and we are passionate. If you don't like it? I don't care Foxdemon. I am not some Aussie rightist who grew up with those styles. I never will be. hmm, @Potemkin doesn't seem to mind my passionate style of talking or writing. That you think it is about being in a bad mood or something? Fox MAN you need to get out of Australia and visit the Latin American nations someday. And stop assuming that everyone has the same style. I write in the English language. But I am not an English speaking culture person. Get that through your head.

You are not used to that passionate and direct style. It is particular to the Cubans, Puerto Ricans and Dominican way of expression. You only read my words Foxdemon....you did not hear it did you? No voice sound at all? Yet you got the passion anyway. That is who I am. Passionate and outspoken about injustices. I don't go for the Bregman style. I am not Dutch. Lol. It works that coldish, logical, flat delivery with truth to power like Tucker Carlson did not like.

The Africans and the Latin Americans got more to complain about by far in the world of being exploited to make all these banker freaks...who not only rip us off but who are racist pigs as well thinking they are better than we are because somehow they are the ones with money and control in the world and we are just the grunts. All societies have class structures. But they break down when there is too much lack of justice for too long. And you can't waste time anymore.

Bregman is Dutch. But he proposes a solution. He is not from the Right. I am on the side of all the ones proposing stopping and confronting the rich and powerful in a war to change the world for the better. Some of us will do it like the ex-president of Uruguay Jose Mujica, others will do it like a Swedish socialist would do it. Others like the French or any other nation full of socialist thought for restructuring society.

Putting human needs and abilities first before profit is a good idea. Lol. Get used to it. Leave your boring style at home Foxdemon. Another thing to think about Fox man? It looks like people are staying at home and losing salaries and losing profits and they are doing it for a fairly long stretch of time. Why? Because they know the undeniable truth that HUMAN life and saving human life is more important than profiting. Some think it is not and proceed to delight in making money from the misery of their fellow human beings in pain. I say? Their time will come too. Just you wait. The ones trying to cooperate to save lives in this pandemic already chose a side and a political point of view. They just haven't putt a name on it yet. But I have. SOCIALISM :lol:

no , i am not gonna do it. her grandfather was a[…]

did you know it ? shocking information , any comme[…]

Which gives rise to an equally terrible far right[…]

Imagine how delighted you will be when the Circus[…]