Tainari88 wrote:For me the UK is stuck with that monarchy because to abolish it would mean that all that Royal title stuff was a mistake. You can't deny that the reason for workhouses and so on in England was to shame the poor for being poor. because the truth is that the Royal are there because they are special people. They got blueblood from so many centuries of inbreeding and incest between kissing cousins trying to keep the money and privileges strictly within the family.
This may hold true for the prior born royals and higher nobles. However for the latter born descendants of the royal families of Europe, whose bloodlines have tricked down into the gentry, and even clear into the working class, this has not held true. Capitalism has had a relatively leveling impact. Not as radically equalizing as with socialism, yet still more so than under the much more static social hierarchy of feudalism. My own lineage , as I have found out from researching my family tree , testifies to this. I am descended in part from various branches of European royalty , including such countries as Spain, and even Byzantine Greece , but also from different interrelated rabbinical families, Sephardic as well as Ashkenazic . Not to mention all the commoners. So then, rhetorically asking, what then is my heritage? Do I for instance count as being Hispanic, simply because a number of my ancestors were originally from Spain , as it turns out? Or is a deeper connection to culture and community required over a shared ethnicity, however distant?