Pants-of-dog wrote:And?
And supporting black people committing crimes gets them in trouble, not you. Nice job white supremacist!
Julian658 wrote:The left often practices condescending racism of low expectations with black people and other minorities (except Asians and Indian immigrants).
Well it's not just that, Tainari88 even includes prisoners and former prisoners. If you get out of prison after 5-7 for armed robbery and manslaughter, does the government really owe you a living on welfare because you don't want to pick strawberries? I find that sort of reasoning mind boggling.
Tainari88 wrote:It is not about laziness bj, it is about not having to be exploited.
When my grandmother got here to America, she worked as a maid. She sent money home to Ireland and helped her sister go to nursing school. Then, she was a housewife. To bring in a little bit of extra money, she was a yard duty at a local elementary school. She was lily white. The idea that only black people faced exploitation is a myth spread by today's liberal elite and their race hustler friends to divide blacks and whites on the grounds that somehow my grandmother working as a maid had white privilege while a black colleague was somehow disadvantaged. The issue in exploitation is class, not race.
Tainari88 wrote:They are terminating the employer-employee relationship and going with the higher paying employer. It is about OPTIONS. Not being lazy.
What if they say "I can't find work" to the welfare office when in fact they can?
Tainari88 wrote:You are the one who thinks people work these jobs because they don't have a work ethic.
Where have I ever said that someone picking crops had a poor work ethic?
Tainari88 wrote:They don't work the jobs because they are avoiding exploitation BJ.
They are avoiding hard work in the hot sun, and because it is seasonal and that provides a loophole to get on welfare, that is what they do. Do you know what "picking buds" pays? $16.50 an hour. Some pay as low as $15 an hour. Some pay as high as $20 an hour. It's generally better than minimum wage in most places in California.
Tainari88 wrote:There would be no illegal aliens/undocumented workers working those farm jobs in California BJ, if the Mexican employers would be paying a lot higher wages in Mexico.
I don't get to vote in Mexico, unless I do it illegally like many illegal aliens do in the US. So I have limited influence over what happens in Mexico.
Tainari88 wrote:A point I made earlier about Bacon's Rebellion which you never address.
I'm perfectly aware of these things. I'm just pointing out that these systems of servitude pre-date capitalism. That's why I suggest reading Harold J. Berman's Law and Revolution. It's not a tome of ideas that you would hear from me. It gives you a history of the evolution of the Western legal system.
Tainari88 wrote:Which is obfuscation as Noemon pointed out as one of your avoidance tactics. It is not working.
If you choose to know nothing about law and history, how am I to help you? Do you understand the difference between slavery, indentured servitude, villainy, and serfdom? These all pre-date capitalism. Capitalists campaigned to wipe these systems out, not preserve them.
Tainari88 wrote:African Americans are not interested in serving iced tea to some white racist women in Alabama because they got sick of being told how dirty and diseased they were and that even though they were cleaning the house well every day and polishing the silver with their bare hands that the white racist women would eat off every day...they had to go and take a poop separately because everyone knows that the white racist shit is better than the black maid's shit. That is the problem with them accepting those jobs they dumped a long time ago. Why did they get out of those professions? I would too if I had to deal with these women every day being Black BJ.
Segregation is a separate matter from the racist white woman you have constructed in your imagination. If you get rid of segregated bathrooms, what then happens to your system? Then it comes down to emotions--that primitive part of the human brain you seem to extol for some reason.
Tainari88 wrote:But you are completely incapable of putting yourself in that position. Why? I can put myself in their shoes? Are you so narcissistic like Trump that you can't understand why African Americans who were never lazy by the way, would avoid working in those positions like picking fruit and vegetables and watching kids and cleaning houses? They avoid exploitation.
Rubbish. I have a first cousin once removed who emigrated from Ireland, married an American woman who had an excellent job as a buyer for Macy's. She runs a daycare in her home now. Why? It pays more. Does she feel exploited? No. She's the one doing the exploiting. Do you think my maid feels exploited? She gets her asking price and a tip every week. She got paid during the coronavirus lockdowns when we wouldn't have anyone in the house. She gets a Christmas bonus. When my uncle comes down for the holidays, he's surprised because she greets him like he's her own family (he does that to her too, but forgets as he's 86 now and doesn't remember well). When my gardeners came after a few weeks of not being able to come, they still got their monthly pay and I gave all three of them a $20 cash tip. Are they getting exploited? No. They don't declare all their income, so they are undertaxed comparatively. They have to live a shady life in a legal sense, but economically they are better off than people on welfare.
Tainari88 wrote:Because if you have a permanent maid or servant in your home? The rich and middle-class pendejo employers would slide into exploitation shit mode, and the Department of Labor had to cope with it.
No. That's not the whole of it. Sure, you get fuckwits who won't pay. However, the reason is often that if your maid lives in your home, she is also legally a tenant. Pendejo Marxists can accept a job, get through the first pay stub, quit the job and live in your house rent free for the six months it takes to get the unlawful detainer case to trial. It's surprising that a Marxist like yourself doesn't know this first hand. I actually take a very big risk in letting my maid have a key to my front door rather than letting her in and out myself, but she is more or less like family as she serves my sisters homes, and some of my other friends too. So she just comes to the house and opens the front door and says "Hola" to announce that she's here. You don't take on a majordomo without a lot more going on. There is no more Alice at the Brady Bunch house anymore; and, that's another reason you see so much homelessness. If you cut the poor a break, the courts will hold you to it and you end up having to sell your property and move elsewhere to get out of the situation. I guess you've never heard of such situations or are so disposed to the Marxist line on everything that it does not occur to you why most rich people do not have staff that live on premises anymore when they can more than afford it.
Tainari88 wrote:Here is a little clip reminding you why a Black woman in those times and with that job might consider saying no to that job if she had a choice of another job or even working for her own janitorial business instead?
Most people doing that work are doing it as their own business. They also usually have a W2 job and claim poverty. They do not declare the income from their housecleaning jobs. You are remarkably naive for someone with such a strong opinion on this topic.
Tainari88 wrote:No, they don't love it. No one does. Get that through your skull BJ.
Nobody loves scrubbing toilets. That's why the people who can afford to pay someone else to do it are keen to do so. When someone volunteers to do it and names their price and you pay them their stated price, that is not exploitation.
Tainari88 wrote:Now they have Latin American women doing the jobs and they are still complaining about their lack of being able to find English speaking help. Assholes I say.
To be more accurate and polite, you could just say "rich Democrats."
Pants-of-dog wrote:In fact, I even discussed how black people should not bother with this debate and just take down the flags.
Yeah, so you could get them charged with criminal trespass and theft, and then call white people racist...
Pants-of-dog wrote:And this is why black people should just take down the flags without discussion.
That's so easy for you to say when you're not the one who is going to get arrested and have a criminal record.
"We have put together the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics."
-- Joe Biden