- 20 Feb 2024 12:05
#15304920
Chinese academic Deng Xize : "No more Mongol-Muscovy style empire: Thoughts on the war in Ukraine, ...such empires will no longer be tolerated."
do you agree that The global reaction to the war in Ukraine in fact shows that such empires (Mongol-Muscovy style ) will no longer be tolerated by our intellectuals , politicians, medias, etc. ?
https://www.thinkchina.sg/no-more-mongo ... ar-ukraine
Chinese academic Deng Xize : "No more Mongol-Muscovy style empire: Thoughts on the war in Ukraine, The global reaction to the war in Ukraine in fact shows that such empires will no longer be tolerated."
The Mongol-Muscovy style empire could be defined as a dominating, rapacious empire upheld by violence, especially unruly violence, and exhibiting three prominent characteristics.
First, it uses unruly violence as a regular means of resolving international disputes. While violence is common and sometimes necessary in political or social governance, rules have been set for its use under a modern lawful democratic system. Unlike in ancient times, the use of violence now comes under heavy restrictions and is “predictable”. Such an evolution also applies to international relations.
But why is the Mongol-Muscovy empire more violent, more dominating and more rapacious than other politically similar ancient empires, such as the ancient Chinese empire?
do you agree that The global reaction to the war in Ukraine in fact shows that such empires (Mongol-Muscovy style ) will no longer be tolerated." ?
do you agree that The global reaction to the war in Ukraine in fact shows that such empires (Mongol-Muscovy style ) will no longer be tolerated by our intellectuals , politicians, medias, etc. ?
https://www.thinkchina.sg/no-more-mongo ... ar-ukraine
Chinese academic Deng Xize : "No more Mongol-Muscovy style empire: Thoughts on the war in Ukraine, The global reaction to the war in Ukraine in fact shows that such empires will no longer be tolerated."
The Mongol-Muscovy style empire could be defined as a dominating, rapacious empire upheld by violence, especially unruly violence, and exhibiting three prominent characteristics.
First, it uses unruly violence as a regular means of resolving international disputes. While violence is common and sometimes necessary in political or social governance, rules have been set for its use under a modern lawful democratic system. Unlike in ancient times, the use of violence now comes under heavy restrictions and is “predictable”. Such an evolution also applies to international relations.
But why is the Mongol-Muscovy empire more violent, more dominating and more rapacious than other politically similar ancient empires, such as the ancient Chinese empire?
do you agree that The global reaction to the war in Ukraine in fact shows that such empires (Mongol-Muscovy style ) will no longer be tolerated." ?
- By Doug64
- By KurtFF8
- By Rancid