Juice wrote:Not until we finish what Hitler started.
Hitler would finish you too
Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...
Juice wrote:Not until we finish what Hitler started.
Zionist Nationalist wrote:
Hitler would finish you too
Juice wrote:Ironically, he'll finish alot of Whites, including his most hardcore supporters(The South, Easterners) but hey at least he kill americans( it ain't going to be "Man on a high castle" or Wolfenstein.) He'll kill a lot of Whites.
Zionist Nationalist wrote:Hopefully your girlfriend house. But you're old and ugly, so no female would want you.
negro where do you live?
I bet not in africa otherwise you would have troubles finding an internet connection
Zionist Nationalist wrote:negro where do you live?
SolarCross wrote:@The Immortal Goon Hong Wu and Frollein have you right, I have nothing else to add.
The NCBI wrote:Conservatism was associated with increased volume of the right amygdala. These results were replicated in an independent sample of additional participants. Our findings extend previous observations that political attitudes reflect differences in self-regulatory conflict monitoring [4] and recognition of emotional faces [5] by showing that such attitudes are reflected in human brain structure.
Psycology Today wrote:Peering inside the brain with MRI scans, researchers at University College London found that self-described conservative students had a larger amygdala than liberals. The amygdala is an almond-shaped structure deep in the brain that is active during states of fear and anxiety. Liberals had more gray matter at least in the anterior cingulate cortex, a region of the brain that helps people cope with complexity.
Discover wrote:conservatives are more likely to have an enlarged amygdala, where the development and storage of emotional memories takes place. More than one study has shown these same results, which is why I felt it was worth investigating.
Marx wrote:The premises from which we begin are not arbitrary ones, not dogmas, but real premises from which abstraction can only be made in the imagination. They are the real individuals, their activity and the material conditions under which they live, both those which they find already existing and those produced by their activity. These premises can thus be verified in a purely empirical way.
The first premise of all human history is, of course, the existence of living human individuals. Thus the first fact to be established is the physical organisation of these individuals and their consequent relation to the rest of nature. Of course, we cannot here go either into the actual physical nature of man, or into the natural conditions in which man finds himself – geological, hydrographical, climatic and so on. The writing of history must always set out from these natural bases and their modification in the course of history through the action of men.
Men can be distinguished from animals by consciousness, by religion or anything else you like. They themselves begin to distinguish themselves from animals as soon as they begin to produce their means of subsistence, a step which is conditioned by their physical organisation. By producing their means of subsistence men are indirectly producing their actual material life.
The way in which men produce their means of subsistence depends first of all on the nature of the actual means of subsistence they find in existence and have to reproduce. This mode of production must not be considered simply as being the production of the physical existence of the individuals. Rather it is a definite form of activity of these individuals, a definite form of expressing their life, a definite mode of life on their part. As individuals express their life, so they are. What they are, therefore, coincides with their production, both with what they produce and with how they produce. The nature of individuals thus depends on the material conditions determining their production.
SolarCross wrote:There is no hope for you it seems. You might be sad that you don't get to be a commissar in a position to be able to deny bread rations to all those that fail to pay lip service to your absurd and odious belief system because of those imaginary yet pesky fat men in top hats won't let you, but just speaking for myself I am pretty cool with that. Long may it continue.
SolarCross wrote:The phrase is the "truth will set you free", education if it deserves that name might facilitate the acquisition of truth or it may obscure it. Sadly it seems the education bubble has only increased the quantity of education and not its quality, far too much institutional education is pretty trashy these days and a total waste of money, you know all that SJW and marxist trash. One might as well be studying Divinities except Christian scholars at least are sweet people generally rather than bile dripping weasels like your average leftard cultist.
The time has come to clean house.
Frollein wrote:It's a typical leftist tactic to accuse their opponents to be irrational (see the various "-phobia" accusations) so they don't have to address the actual arguments of the debate; mostly to deflect from their own irrational ideology.
Zionist Nationalist wrote:Im not a conservative
I just dont like homosexuals
and I dont like the idea that nowdays we are forced to like and accept them.
I refuse.
right to left wrote:That's even worse! What would you do if one of your children was gay? You think they're invading from outer space or something?
Zionist Nationalist wrote:If my son will be gay I will disown him
lesbian daughter is somewhat acceptable
The dominant race of the planet is still the White[…]
Has it been challenged in court?
I recently heard a video where Penn Jillette (worl[…]
UK study finds young adults taking longer to fi[…]