[SolarCross]

It is my impression that as you go higher in the spectrum of people who know how politics works, you encounter a higher percentage of leftists.

It would be interesting to confirm if this is true.

In other words (as you are so fond of doing), leftist says his feelings indicate that only leftists are the true messiahs and it would be interesting if another leftist's feelings would confirm this... (said while the leftist in question is furiously fapping at the sight of his own reflection).

------------------

Eduction isn't a conspiracy. Self-education can help you learn things! And when you learn things, my guess is that you won't be so scared and dependent upon your emotional outbursts all the time. You'll be able to look a facts, reason more clearly, and come to logical conclusions. You can start by just reading more. If you want, I can make a list for you

Most education is okay of course: science, math, art, literature.. all good stuff hell even a bit of woodwork or home economics is just fine but as for marxism, scientology, white guilt studies and other quack fake stuff lol that stuff is too retarded to even be a conspiracy.

I know what would be on your list, the same dreary old timey cult stuff you post here all the time as if anyone actually wants to read any of that stupid shit. Your list begins with marx (pbuh) and ends with marx (pbuh). Thanks but I have enough toilet paper as I don't live in Venezuala.

[skinster]

Good god this thread

[colliric]

Good god this thread

Now we know this is a "No Libertarians here" zone!

[The Immortal Goon]

Most education is okay of course: science, math, art, literature.. all good stuff hell even a bit of woodwork or home economics is just fine but as for marxism, scientology, white guilt studies and other quack fake stuff lol that stuff is too retarded to even be a conspiracy.

I know what would be on your list, the same dreary old timey cult stuff you post here all the time as if anyone actually wants to read any of that stupid shit. Your list begins with marx (pbuh) and ends with marx (pbuh). Thanks but I have enough toilet paper as I don't live in Venezuala.

See, these are your feelings about topics. I think with some basic education, you could actually make an analysis that doesn't rely on how you feel. I wouldn't recommend Marx as I honestly think you'd struggle with it.

Since you are having difficulty telling the difference between opinions and facts, I would start you here:

Let me know if you need help with this! After you're done, let me know and I can find something else to help you

[AFAIK]

I think most of these alt-right posters would fit in Qatz's category. They just argue from opinion and make no reference to documented reality and then complain that the people who engage them aren't debating on their terms and can therefore be dismissed out of hand.

[Pants-of-dog]

In other words (as you are so fond of doing), leftist says his feelings indicate that only leftists are the true messiahs and it would be interesting if another leftist's feelings would confirm this... (said while the leftist in question is furiously fapping at the sight of his own reflection).

No.

I meant that most political scientists and sociologists that I have met have been Marxists.

And then I pointed out that this is solely my impression, and not to be confused with a verified fact.

My feelings are irrelevant. This is actually the second time I say this, but you seem to have habit of ignoring what Marxists and progressives actually say and instead just make crap up and convince yourself that we believe said crap.

[LV-GUCCI-PRADA-FLEX]

I am a left-liberal in my country, but probably just a plain centrist in other countries. I'm ok with capitalism as long as we have a strong social safety net and regulations to prevent businesses from gaining too much power/influence. I come from a long line of FDR Democrats.

[SolarCross]

Let me know if you need help with this! After you're done, let me know and I can find something else to help you

Patronising condescension isn't persuasive. I already know you are my enemy, whilst civilisation reigns neither of us will do much but flame on the internet like fairies but if you ever get your revolution then it will be open season on leftists so I can kill as many of your sort as I like just as you will line up whoever you don't like against walls for shooting and whatnot.

It will probably never happen now of course scientology communism is a dead proposition. Islam is the cult to watch now.

No.

I meant that most political scientists and sociologists that I have met have been Marxists.

And then I pointed out that this is solely my impression, and not to be confused with a verified fact.

My feelings are irrelevant. This is actually the second time I say this, but you seem to have habit of ignoring what Marxists and progressives actually say and instead just make crap up and convince yourself that we believe said crap.

Well you said "when you go higher up the spectrum of people who knows how politics works", you didn't say anything about "political scientists" (as they like to call themselves though if one can't do math and don't use the scientific method in any shape or form then one is NOT a scientist, not even a sceintologist, just a pundit with a phd in punditry), or "sociologists" (same with pol-sci really) as far as the mickey mouse college courses go yes you find the dregs of middle class in abundance and marxtardism in some form or another does seem to be fashionable with them. That's cultural marxism as it is called by some. But one does not have a higher understanding of politics by parroting the surreal rants of some odious degenerate of a "professor" when he is not randomly assaulting people with a bike lock. It is because of this teritary education needs a purge as it is infected by these dismally inferior people who really don't belong there and consequently bring those institutions into disrepute.

[The Immortal Goon]

Patronising condescension isn't persuasive. I already know you are my enemy, whilst civilisation reigns neither of us will do much but flame on the internet like fairies but if you ever get your revolution then it will be open season on leftists so I can kill as many of your sort as I like just as you will line up whoever you don't like against walls for shooting and whatnot.

The fact remains that you still can only reply with your feelings instead of with use of reason.

I do not expect you to see the error in using erratic emotional responses right away. My general hope is that by simply pointing it out, you'll be more inclined to rely on facts.

Though I generally follow Che's thought that:

One ought to be "Marxist' with the same naturalness with which one is "Newtonian" in physics, or "Pasteurian" in biology, considering that if facts determine new concepts, these new concepts will never divest themselves of that portion of truth possessed by the older concepts they have outdated.

And this becomes obvious with education. But even if the blubbering rightwing weren't to become Marxists, I would hope that by using logic and facts we could use a BB to its full potential and really dig deep into issues instead of being subjected to the constant whining of people needing to be considered victims.

[Pants-of-dog]

Well you said "when you go higher up the spectrum of people who knows how politics works", you didn't say anything about "political scientists" (as they like to call themselves though if one can't do math and don't use the scientific method in any shape or form then one is NOT a scientist, not even a sceintologist, just a pundit with a phd in punditry), or "sociologists" (same with pol-sci really) as far as the mickey mouse college courses go yes you find the dregs of middle class in abundance and marxtardism in some form or another does seem to be fashionable with them.

I assumed that everyone knew that political scientists and sociologists were knowledgeable about politics. Apparently you believe otherwise based solely on your feelings.

Well, thanks for sharing your feelings but since it does not contradict nor support my claim, I hope you understand why I will simply ignore it.

That's cultural marxism as it is called by some. But one does not have a higher understanding of politics by parroting the surreal rants of some odious degenerate of a "professor" when he is not randomly assaulting people with a bike lock. It is because of this teritary education needs a purge as it is infected by these dismally inferior people who really don't belong there and consequently bring those institutions into disrepute.

Patronising condescension isn't persuasive.

[SolarCross]

The fact remains that you still can only reply with your feelings instead of with use of reason.

I do not expect you to see the error in using erratic emotional responses right away. My general hope is that by simply pointing it out, you'll be more inclined to rely on facts.

That's how you feel about it. I am not interested in your kooky feels.

Though I generally follow Che's thought that:

Of course you do, he's a commie. Why think for yourself when you can just quote the feelings of commies?

And this becomes obvious with education. But even if the blubbering rightwing weren't to become Marxists, I would hope that by using logic and facts we could use a BB to its full potential and really dig deep into issues instead of being subjected to the constant whining of people needing to be considered victims

Which education would that be? white guilt studies? alphabet soup gender studies? or rage against people with more money than you with marxtardinomics?

I assumed that everyone knew that political scientists and sociologists were knowledgeable about politics. Apparently you believe otherwise based solely on your feelings.

Well, thanks for sharing your feelings but since it does not contradict nor support my claim, I hope you understand why I will simply ignore it.

I understand what you are.

Patronising condescension isn't persuasive.

Polly want a cracker?

[Pants-of-dog]

No, you do not understand what I am. You simply think you do, but what you think you understand is a figment of your imagination.

[demima]

If my son will be gay I will disown him
lesbian daughter is somewhat acceptable

WTF? Why, so you can watch them? So creepy.

[Zionist Nationalist]

WTF? Why, so you can watch them? So creepy.

lol no just a gay son is a great shame but lesbian daughter is more tolerable

no parent want a gay son but none have the guts to admit it so many who has one those days pretend that its ok while deep in their hearts they wish their son was normal

[Oxymandias]

@Zionist Nationalist

Ah yes, let's let you speak for the entirety of humanity as if everyone sees exactly the way you do.

Whether or not a gay son is a shame to a family depends on culture, political climate, and ideology of the parents.

[Lexington]

lol no just a gay son is a great shame but lesbian daughter is more tolerable

no parent want a gay son but none have the guts to admit it so many who has one those days pretend that its ok while deep in their hearts they wish their son was normal

See, among the people I know and hang out with, these attitudes would be the shameful thing.

[Ned Lud]

I find the American way of mixing up politics with personal issues of no evident political significance (homo-sexuality, abortion, guns etcetera) peculiarly baffling - a sign, I suppose, of the continuing influence of the (very) late Senator McCarthy in eliminating clear thinking about politics. I was brought up a Marxist and find any other approach equivalent to Creationism. The world is very odd under unrestrained capitalism.

[mikema63]

I was brought up a Marxist and find any other approach equivalent to Creationism.

And creationists were brought up creationist and see other approaches as equivalent to evolution. It's very easy to turn up your nose at the opinions of other people if you are convinced in advance of your own superior upbringing and breeding.

[Pants-of-dog]

...
I was brought up a Marxist and find any other approach equivalent to Creationism. The world is very odd under unrestrained capitalism.

I know exactly what you mean.

[Verv]

I vote 'alt right' for myself because I feel that Fascist is too loaded of an ideology and too loaded of a phrase. Besides, I do associate myself more with Dugin these days.