Suntzu wrote:One of thousands of articles on the topic:
"GREEN BAY - Black students in the Green Bay School District have been suspended at a rate five times greater than white students and four times more than Hispanic students.
During the 2015-16 school year, 356 of the 1,212 students suspended from Green Bay schools were black. They accounted for 29 percent of the total suspensions, yet black students make up only 9 percent of the student body, according to data submitted to the state Department of Public Instruction."
Link:https://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/story/news/education/2018/01/14/green-bay-schools-struggle-disproportionate-suspensions-black-students/950401001/
This is reflected later in life as a much higher crime rate for Blacks, Blacks accounting for roughly half of the U.S. prison population.
You have not responded to what you believe is the reason as I asked you. There are two possibilities one being that black people do not get the same opportunities and the other being that black people are inherently inferior, inherently violent etc. This seems to be the one you go by.
Race scientists claim there are evolutionary bases for disparities in social outcomes – such as life expectancy, educational attainment, wealth, and incarceration rates – between racial groups.
As it is I can provide you with the reason which was in the article I gave you and it is very related to the continuous tries to sell the erroneous view that blacks are genetically inferior. You kept blacks as slaves and have never made proper restitution for that. Unfortunately many of you have never psychologically understood what you did and rather try to find new reasons to continue this. This is American's White Nationalism. Given that America is losing its position in the world, that white working class people are losing the advantages they always had as the majority to have the opportunity of a job with an increasingly good standard of living it seems to be open door to use inherent racism in the US to harm those who have always been harmed the most.
Although race science has been repeatedly debunked by scholarly research, in recent years it has made a comeback. Many of the keenest promoters of race science today are stars of the “alt-right”, who like to use pseudoscience to lend intellectual justification to ethno-nationalist politics. If you believe that poor people are poor because they are inherently less intelligent, then it is easy to leap to the conclusion that liberal remedies, such as affirmative action or foreign aid, are doomed to fail.
There are scores of recent examples of rightwingers banging the drum for race science. In July 2016, for example, Steve Bannon, who was then Breitbart boss and would go on to be Donald Trump’s chief strategist, wrote an article in which he suggested that some black people who had been shot by the police might have deserved it. “There are, after all, in this world, some people who are naturally aggressive and violent,” Bannon wrote, evoking one of scientific racism’s ugliest contentions: that black people are more genetically predisposed to violence than others.
Now again, we know that the poorest children by the age of 5 are one year behind those of the richest on ability and that this is due to them having a poorer diet as well as less educational toys and books, less ability to visit and learn about different things, go on holidays and so on as well as the extra stress there most certainly is when living in abject poverty. It doesn't matter what colour people are. That is true of all colours. That is the reason why it is essential to give such children a 'head start' in order to give them the same start as other children particularly in the US where you have the greatest inequality in the developed world. 'Race Scientists' try to influence people that it is not due to social and economic conditions it is due to 'race' in order to keep black people down.
The subject of race and IQ was similarly politicised in the US, where Jensen’s paper was used to oppose welfare schemes, such as the Head Start programme, which were designed to lift children out of poverty.
In the past, race science has shaped not only political discourse, but also public policy. The year after The Bell Curve was published, in the lead-up to a Republican congress slashing benefits for poorer Americans, Murray gave expert testimony before a Senate committee on welfare reform; more recently, congressman Paul Ryan, who helped push the Republicans’ latest tax cuts for the wealthy, has claimed Murray as an expert on poverty.
https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/m ... ce-scienceIn all societies the poorest are always the ones that goes against the law the most though in the US this is aggravated by the reality that you no longer have a proper justice system. People are told that if they do not agree they have committed such a crime they will get three times as long in jail and that the court will prove it. Most of them agree to plead guilty regardless of whether they have committed the crime knowing all the odds are against them.
In order to prove people are intrinsically something - to you blacks been disruptive and undisciplined as children you would need to show that blacks living in all different kinds of communities have the same problem and that they differ from whites living under the same conditions. You can't do that. You are simply choosing to use the various tenets the white supremacists, now race scientists, use to keep blacks down and White Supremacy Up and given your current difficult economic position ,white supremacists are certainly exploiting this to allow whites to take on an false victim attitude to justify their racism.