[Deutschmania]

Basically , I would characterize myself as being agnostic . More specifically though , I tend to support the idea of naturalistic pantheism / religious naturalism . Some , such as Richard Dawkins , might even conclude that I am essentially a "sexed up atheist" as a result . https://www.pantheism.net/atheism/

[Victoribus Spolia]

I am an Augustinian Paleo-Catholic. I support the Conservative Reformation of the Lutheran and Anglican communions, but not without criticism and also have favorable views of the Jansenists, but tend to see my thought as a strong strand within the medieval scholastic tradition of the Catholic church existing all through its history; The Schola Via Moderna Augustiniana.

I am a communicate member of the Lutheran Church, Missouri Synod and subscribe to the Book of Concord as such is best approximation of my convictions regarding the Scriptures and the Fathers. I was formerly a Covenanter or Reformed Presbyterian (Calvinist). My family background is made up Baptists, Agnostics, and Roman Catholics.

I am a nominalist and an immaterialist and so I reject the existence of mind independent substance (matter) and physical causation.

All experienced reality is an immediate mental event caused/originating in the Trinitarian Supreme Mind.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subjective_idealism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominalism

[One Degree]

Agnostic comes closest. If you want to define God as some kind of unifying energy or aliens who seeded earth then I might be a believer. Something is there, I just don’t know what it is.

[Missus V. Spolia.]

Christian. Calvinistic Lutheran.