- 23 Oct 2018 04:47
#14955991
This is the sort of interference that seems just fine. We don't want idiots voting, and only idiots would think you can vote by phone.
I suspect that was done for accounting purposes to ensure that they actually indicted some Russians. Politically, it's laughable of course. The whole story was obviously false from the inception.
That's part of why the establishment is freaking out. They figured by underserving the electorate in education that they could more easily manipulate the electorate. The problem is that foreigners can do that too. An educated populace is also the best defense against socialism and cronyism, which is why the establishment doesn't want an educated populace.
Right. The problem is that the surveillance state cannot detect satire, sarcasm, sardonicism, parody and the like by computer algorithm. So we could posit something like this: we should embrace multi-cultural values and be tolerant of different ideas and cultural practices; and so we look forward to Larry Page and Sergey Brin showing openness, acceptance and understanding as we submit them as a blood offering to the gods of freedom in our rite of human sacrifice of those who would censor us. <--Machines cannot tell if that is a joke or not, but humans know immediately. That is why the left has been trying to police humor. They eavesdrop on everything, but unless we all agree to express ourselves with utter literalism, automating communications surveillance is hopeless.
So we probably need to increase sardonic political humor to drive them nuts. I'm going to start with a recipe I'll call "Filet of Feinstein."
Yes, and that's actually something that the billionaires and their propagandists fear, as people like Mark Dice, Styxhexenhammer, Sargon of Akkad, Black Pidgeon and the like have ratings that compete with multi-million dollar productions, and these folks are mostly concocting this stuff in their kitchens, living rooms or home offices with a shoe string budget.
Death as permanent boredom could be why people fear death.
Are you talking about Eric Holder, Maxine Waters, Hillary Clinton, etc.?
Libertarian353 wrote:Also I chose depends cause there were literally russian fake posts online about voting for hiliary on the phones and other false ways of voting. If that count then yes.
This is the sort of interference that seems just fine. We don't want idiots voting, and only idiots would think you can vote by phone.
Hong Wu wrote:One of the funniest things about this Russian interference thing is that the "Russian troll farm" may have been an apartment full of guys drinking vodka who thought it would be funny to put Hillary Clinton's face onto a porn video of a white woman having sex with a black man and title it "how Democrats get votes", and then to their surprise their screen names (which were shit like "Sleepy Bear" etc.) get indicted by an American prosecutor and then maybe they're like "I knew it!" and actually believe that they got Donald Trump elected President.
I suspect that was done for accounting purposes to ensure that they actually indicted some Russians. Politically, it's laughable of course. The whole story was obviously false from the inception.
RhetoricThug wrote:An educated populace is your best defense.
That's part of why the establishment is freaking out. They figured by underserving the electorate in education that they could more easily manipulate the electorate. The problem is that foreigners can do that too. An educated populace is also the best defense against socialism and cronyism, which is why the establishment doesn't want an educated populace.
SolarCross wrote:Satire has been a thing since ancient times.
Right. The problem is that the surveillance state cannot detect satire, sarcasm, sardonicism, parody and the like by computer algorithm. So we could posit something like this: we should embrace multi-cultural values and be tolerant of different ideas and cultural practices; and so we look forward to Larry Page and Sergey Brin showing openness, acceptance and understanding as we submit them as a blood offering to the gods of freedom in our rite of human sacrifice of those who would censor us. <--Machines cannot tell if that is a joke or not, but humans know immediately. That is why the left has been trying to police humor. They eavesdrop on everything, but unless we all agree to express ourselves with utter literalism, automating communications surveillance is hopeless.
So we probably need to increase sardonic political humor to drive them nuts. I'm going to start with a recipe I'll call "Filet of Feinstein."
RhetoricThug wrote:Turn on Youtube, you get armchair politics and a half-baked political analysis.
Yes, and that's actually something that the billionaires and their propagandists fear, as people like Mark Dice, Styxhexenhammer, Sargon of Akkad, Black Pidgeon and the like have ratings that compete with multi-million dollar productions, and these folks are mostly concocting this stuff in their kitchens, living rooms or home offices with a shoe string budget.
SolarCross wrote:Being bored is worse than death.
Death as permanent boredom could be why people fear death.
Pants-of-dog wrote:I find that people who glorify violence are usually the ones who have never been in a fight.
Are you talking about Eric Holder, Maxine Waters, Hillary Clinton, etc.?
"We have put together the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics."
-- Joe Biden
-- Joe Biden