Age I figure will change both of you.
Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...
SSDR wrote:Science is logic. Religion is not.
SSDR wrote:You want to live on the fruit of your own fucking labour? So you don't want to live in a house that was built by OTHER construction workers? You don't want to drive a car that was built by OTHER assembly line workers? You don't want to use utilities that were mined by OTHER mine/coal workers? You think that everything should be locally made? To keep the family institution forced together?
SSDR wrote: If you got into a car accident and you need surgery, you don't want a surgeon to operate on you?
SSDR wrote:Happiness does not come from money at all. I never said that. But what you said makes you sound like you support poverty.
SSDR wrote:In a socialist economy, why would the general populace need guns? More guns means more crime.
Family and morals are oppressive. Marijuana is social decay. There is a difference between progress and social decay.
SSDR wrote:Socialist movements have been pro gun in capitalist economies, but once capitalism is overthrown, then there is no point of common gun ownership since there is no elite to be overthrown.
SSDR wrote:You support poverty, and you don't support universal health care. There doesn't need to be an argument. Because all you're going to do is use religion to back that up, so that religion could be used to cope with poverty and not having access to highly talented surgeons.
SSDR wrote:logic doesn't require "Your" religion.
SSDR wrote:Science is logic.
SSDR wrote:I am against random civilians having access to guns because they don't need them, and it would prevent crime and chaos. Guns are only okay if to go against criminals, revolt against the capitalist elite, fight in wars against hostile civilizations, or to handle social abuse. But I do not support the "gun ownership" that libertarian rightists like you do.
No, logic doesn't require "Your" religion. Science is logic.
I am against random civilians having access to guns because they don't need them
, and it would prevent crime and chaos.
Guns are only okay if to go against criminals, revolt against the capitalist elite, fight in wars against hostile civilizations, or to handle social abuse.
But I do not support the "gun ownership" that libertarian rightists like you do.
SSDR wrote:@annatar1914 That is because I don't need to concede to him, nor to any fucking body.
SSDR wrote:Science proves things. Without science, we would be still stuck in deep poverty, ignorance, and extreme oppression.
SSDR wrote:I am a Scientific socialist. Marx himself even called himself a scientific socialist. The term "Marxism" was created by capitalists like you to make socialism look unattractive.
SSDR wrote:Different conditions require different solutions. In a pure socialist society, random people having access to guns is not necessary.
annatar1914 wrote:Sure, tell that to yourself and your friends, it may help you sleep better at night
SSDR wrote:@annatar1914 There is no such thing as a "friend." "Friends" are social constructs that keep society under a social hierarchy. If one cannot be friends with every single human that ever existed, then one must not allow any social construct like that, or else they would be promoting a social hierarchy.
There is no issue with debating about the internal factors within a socialist revolution. But VS is not a socialist.
Victoribus Spolia wrote:
Child's play my good friend, as you can see.
Godspeed and have a blessed evening. I'm off to bed with my beautiful wife.
Hope you and yours are well.
SSDR wrote:@annatar1914, There is no god.......
Yeah that is what the law says. What is your poi[…]
Yes it has. I'm just done with you people. I po[…]
Well, let me explain my reasoning when I say tha[…]
@Palmyrene I'm making it easier for him. If he[…]