Elizabeth Warren might destroy Trump. - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Polls on politics, news, current affairs and history.

Will Warren win the democratic nomination and the beat Trump?

She will not get the nomination
10
36%
She will get the nomination and loose to Trump in the presidential race
8
29%
She will get the nomination and win against Trump in the presidential race
9
32%
Other(please specify)
1
4%
#15045900
With the current unexpected developments in the US, the chances are likely that Warren might be the democratic candidate. For all the information that i have heard about her (Non-news), she is considered one of the most smartest people in DC if not the smartest. She also revealed her medicare plan for all aka the biggest monetary redistribution program for the middle class from the corporations/top 0.1%. Average joes will love this (putting the propaganda aside). So do you think that she will get the candidacy and that she will beat Trump?
#15045909
Finfinder wrote:I'll take some of that action, and you said in your post why she won't destroy Trump. It's real simple people don't want their taxes raised.


As i said, it is a redistribution program so the taxes will be shouldered by the Corporations and the top 1%. Middle class won't be taxed as i understand. That is the whole point of redistribution.
#15045910
JohnRawls wrote:As i said, it is a redistribution program so the taxes will be shouldered by the Corporations and the top 1%. Middle class won't be taxed as i understand. That is the whole point of redistribution.


That is a falsehood she can not account for the spending she proposes. The math doesn't work and she refuses to explain it.
#15045913
Corrected

Finfinder wrote:I'll take some of that action, and you said in your post why she won't destroy Trump. It's real simple peoplecorporations don't want their taxes raised.
#15045914
Finfinder wrote:
That is a falsehood she can not account for the spending she proposes. The math doesn't work and she refuses to explain it.



A country like England spends about half what we do with similar life expectancy.

The transition will be difficult, it always is for any major program. But the deal is the same as Obamacare, the people that were screaming against it started screaming to keep it after they've gotten regular health care.

You're complaining about a problem with politics, that most people can't, or won't, take the time to study policy proposals.
#15045917
late wrote:A country like England spends about half what we do with similar life expectancy.

The transition will be difficult, it always is for any major program. But the deal is the same as Obamacare, the people that were screaming against it started screaming to keep it after they've gotten regular health care.

You're complaining about a problem with politics, that most people can't, or won't, take the time to study policy proposals.



There is no complaint in my post. Is your complaint I just don't take the Democrats word for it. I am simply asking for the math, it should be so easy to offer. Then again I have no idea how you can make the statement above the people did not want Obamacre the few that did screamed the loudest.
#15045939
Finfinder wrote:Do you think Warren can "destroy Trump" in an election if she is anti corporations.

Do you actually believe she won't be on the take (from the corporations)?

BTW who actually likes taxes?


No, no, and no one. However for the third one, people understand that it's a necessary evil.

Ultimately, the government is really just an insurance company backed by an army. Some level of premiums have to be paid into the insurance company.
#15045941
Rancid wrote:No, no, and no one. However for the third one, people understand that it's a necessary evil.

Ultimately, the government is really just an insurance company backed by an army. Some level of premiums have to be paid into the insurance company.


That doesn't translate to a winnable campaign strategy.
#15045953
If I was in charge of dealing with a Trump scene I would not impeach, I would organize a mass effort at reforming the electoral college and getting rid of anything that is not about a popular vote presidency. Then I would be coping with passing legislation reforming what the executive branch is allowed to do by the current checks and balances. Also cleaning out corrupt Democrats and scrutinizing the entire party for lack of ethics. Trying to get rid of that man while he has such awful laws protecting his power? It is foolish.
#15045954
Finfinder wrote:It makes no sense the plan is to impeach Trump at the expense of not winning the presidency and losing the majority in the house.


Impeach or no impeach, the democrats aren't winning.

From a political sense, it's probably likely a bad move. Perhaps they are actually acting on some sort of principle, which is why I'm fine with them moving forward with it. Not like I give a shit about either party.
#15045955
Zionist Nationalist wrote:She is going against the top 1%,Powerful corporations,Military lobby
Good luck with that :lol:
My guess is that Democrats will bite their lips and will nominate senile Joe
this will decrease their chances of winning but money speaks louder
Image


I am not a Zionist fan here but he hit the nail on the head of why Warren is not going to get the nomination. And why those spineless Democrats will go for Biden or some other person.

Warren is going to go against the people Zionist talked about. Will they react? The issue that the Dems have is being sellouts to these people who don't like her stuff...and being in a party that is sellout.

I am not a Warren fan. Too pro capitalism for me and she is not a true Leftist and her references to her Native American ancestry and talking about that and being so obvious about political correctness is a turn off to me. I don't like liberals in general but she is the most liberal of all and did not really back the socialist wing of that party. For me? She is a sellout too....but? The party is not full of people willing to take on those powerful people mentioned up in that post...she is not going to be the final candidate.
#15045957
Rancid wrote:Impeach or no impeach, the democrats aren't winning.

From a political sense, it's probably likely a bad move. Perhaps they are actually acting on some sort of principle, which is why I'm fine with them moving forward with it. Not like I give a shit about either party.


If you are open minded I find it difficult you think the Deomcrats are acting on principle perhaps you are not.
Why do you think its good for the country.

Moving on to the next misuse of language that sho[…]

@JohnRawls What if your assumption is wrong??? […]

Israel-Palestinian War 2023

Only Zionists believe that bollocks and you lot ar[…]

There is no reason to have a state at all unless w[…]