[Patrickov]

SolarCross is misrepresenting my argument, which is that there should be limits to free speech where it is harmful, not whimsical. He thinks it's simply all or nothing, and stated such. Such is obviously not the case, and so then we venture into his feelings and what he thinks should happen to people who don't agree with his radical view.

I admit that I am not interested in that discussion.

I was merely saying that his observation on "who deserves to lose freedom of speech and who doesn't" seems opposite to mine, even if all of whom he mentioned share points of view.

[Godstud]

As Clint Eastwood said in Unforgiven:

"Deserve's got nothing to do with it.".