- 09 Sep 2020 17:57
#15118511
That's one way to admit you're out of your depth.
If you actually could do this, you would have counterarguments, not character attacks.
Russia, and it' trolls, need to own it. They screwed up early and often.
We are far from perfect, but this was a long time coming. Soviet mismanagement, massive corruption under Putin, and Putin's revanchist ambitions will be the ruin of Russia.
annatar1914 wrote:
What I have done is a mistake in that I assumed more from you. Organizations like the CSIS are called ''think tanks'', where discussions among alleged ''experts'' are held by the public to hash out the proper means of dealing with international and other issues. They are most emphatically not. What they are, these organizations, are conveyor belts transmitting the will of the Elites to academia and other nodes of the intellectual world. CSIS and other organizations were created in the 20th century not to reflect the opinion of intelligent men, but to shape and mold that opinion.
Therefore, a Western institution like CSIS,( or the CFR, etc..).a child of the Jesuit order and Georgetown University, is going to always reflect the Western desire to divide Eurasian states further, subdue them, exploit and destroy them. Now, they will come up with all kinds of sophistical justifications to obscure the primary goals, but that's their job, and they're paid well for it.
So yes, I get it. What I don't get, or rather couldn't, was why you'd try to bring it up this paper from CSIS as some kind of wise declaration from on high. It isn't. All it does is reveal certain people for the fake ass establishment stooges that they are.
That's one way to admit you're out of your depth.
If you actually could do this, you would have counterarguments, not character attacks.
Russia, and it' trolls, need to own it. They screwed up early and often.
We are far from perfect, but this was a long time coming. Soviet mismanagement, massive corruption under Putin, and Putin's revanchist ambitions will be the ruin of Russia.
Facts have a well known liberal bias