Best economic system - Page 2 - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Polls on politics, news, current affairs and history.

Which economic system is the best one?

Communism
18
22%
Socialism
10
12%
Mixed economy (left-wing)
12
15%
Mixed economy (centrist)
10
12%
Mixed economy (right-wing)
19
23%
Laissez-faire capitalism
11
13%
Other
2
2%
User avatar
By Beren
#1425147
First of all: COMMUNISM IS NOT FOR TODAY!
It would be great, if the human race were mature enough for communism, but it is not yet. :*(

For the present the very most of the economy should be privately owned. The question is how much of the GDP should be redistributed by the state.

FRS wrote:In the United States, the closest we can get is probably corporate nationalism.

As far as I can see there are two choices in the US: things keep going on as they go henceforward or some kind of liberal social democracy comes.
Last edited by Beren on 14 Jan 2008 03:25, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By Kapanda
#1425150
It's not just that we may not be mature enough, we're not efficient enough. We actually cannot collect all resources, and efficiently distribute them to the population. The free market is more efficient at that.
User avatar
By Beren
#1425164
It's not just that we may not be mature enough, we're not efficient enough.

I meant 'maturity' as an overall concept. It contains efficiency and things like that either.
User avatar
By Kleptonis
#1425175
Mixed economy (right-wing)

The practical benefits of capitalism + a state to regulate the gross abusers. I'd personally consider my own views on a mixed economy as "centrist", but using Mazhi's definitions, I think the right-wing version is best.

(In this case "best" means the one that tends to be the most efficient in providing for people's wants and needs in the modern world. Idealistically, communism is the best, but that doesn't really mean anything as to how we should act now.)
User avatar
By Dan
#1425205
Mixed economy (right-wing)

Goran pretty much hit the nail on the head.
User avatar
By Annatar
#1425305
Mixed economy (left-wing)

Essentially corporatism of the peronist kind that combines the interests of the workers and the nation.
User avatar
By Ombrageux
#1425310
I voted mixed (left-wing) in the sense that taxes, redistribution and govt-led investment should be high. I don't necessarily think nationalized industries are a good thing.
User avatar
By Rancid
#1425312
taxes, redistribution and govt-led investment should be high.


no, no and no.. ESPECIALLY to the third one..
User avatar
By Vera Politica
#1425391
a classless, stateless society where everyone owns everything


You did notice that this wasn't really a proposed economic system.... right?

Anyway, I'm trying to work out (in my head) a functional economic system in the communist social model.... it would need to be a free market without private or state property.
User avatar
By Nets
#1425411
Mixed economy (centrist)

Public Utilities, (Universal) Healthcare & Education, Defense, Health Insurance, Social Security -- all government run

Everything else -- let the market do its job

Food and housing subsidies for the poor, heavily regulated welfare entitlements

Telecom, Finance, Agriculture, Manufacturing -- all subject to Federal regulatory oversight but privately managed.

A nice mix, everyone goes home happy. :)
User avatar
By Oxymoron
#1425419
Public Utilities, (Universal) Healthcare & Education, Defense, Health Insurance, Social Security -- all government run


Everything except the Defence is throwing money out the window.

food and housing subsidies for the poor


for short period of time would be acceptable.

A nice mix, everyone goes home happy.


not every one the middle calss would get screwed once again.
User avatar
By Brutus
#1425458
A government that is big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away.


Beautifully said.
User avatar
By Noelnada
#1425469
First of all: COMMUNISM IS NOT FOR TODAY!
It would be great, if the human race were mature enough for communism, but it is not yet.


We'll just let starve the part of the human race which is not mature enough for communism. Emo-hippies have not contributed to a better world, Stalin did ! :muha2:
User avatar
By Beren
#1425495
NetsNJFan87 wrote:Mixed economy (centrist)

Public Utilities, (Universal) Healthcare & Education, Defense, Health Insurance, Social Security -- all government run

Everything else -- let the market do its job

Food and housing subsidies for the poor, heavily regulated welfare entitlements

Telecom, Finance, Agriculture, Manufacturing -- all subject to Federal regulatory oversight but privately managed.

A nice mix, everyone goes home happy.

It sounds nice to me either. ;)

Noelnada wrote:We'll just let starve the part of the human race which is not mature enough for communism. Emo-hippies have not contributed to a better world, Stalin did !

The whole human race is not matured enough for living in a classless society yet. Perhaps they could try it in Switzerland or Scandinavia, but I'm not sure they would relly benefit from it.

In my opinion Stalin mocked up the whole thing basically. It wasn't an accident, that Lenin didn't want him to follow him in charge. However, praising Stalin would be quite an unfortunate thing here in Hungary, we had some bad experiences with extreme bolshevism.
By Goranhammer
#1425497
Brutus wrote:Beautifully said.


I wish I could take credit for it. I'm sure Barry Goldwater thanks you though.

NJFan wrote:Public Utilities, (Universal) Healthcare & Education, Defense, Health Insurance, Social Security -- all government run


Public utilities come across a massive free rider inefficiency. Health care/insurance has a bit of the same problem as well as being incredibly expensive. Social Security is a joke; the money you receive for it is a joke. Just more proof of government inefficiency.

The state isn't a replacement for a brain. This is why most socialists you see are incredibly stupid.
By Lensky1917
#1425560
I am inclined to agree with casablanca working with your definitions. It is through the state in which people can own everything as it is the people who give them power to begin with. Furthermore, the communism by your definition cannot occur without socialism by your definition anyway.
User avatar
By Beren
#1425565
I think his definitions are accurate, we've got to distinguish communal property and state property. Communal property would be a great thing, it it were able to work in our days.
By AmericanPatriot
#1425634
Emo-hippies have not contributed to a better world, Stalin did !


That is quite possibly the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Unless that was sarcasm, then you've got real issues. Anyone who kills millions of people is not worthy of being a hero. I suppose you like Hitler too? Yeah, you should. They're great people... :roll:

Stalin, as head of the Politburo, consolidated near-absolute power in the 1930s with a Great Purge of the party, justified as an attempt to expel 'opportunists' and 'counter-revolutionary infiltrators'. Those targeted by the purge were often expelled from the party, however more severe measures ranged from banishment to the Gulag labor camps, to execution after trials held by NKVD troikas.


A leader who kills anyone who gets in his way. Such a great way to run a nation! :roll:

Early researchers attempting to tally the number of people killed under Stalin's regime were forced to rely largely upon anecdotal evidence. Their estimates ranged from a low of 3 million to as high as 60 million.


Yeah, what a great guy. Here let me repeat that for you:

Their estimates ranged from a low of 3 million to as high as 60 million.


KGB documents located in Kiev purportedly demonstrate how the Ukrainian famine (Holodomor) (1932–1933) was artificially engineered, and that while some areas of the Soviet Union affected by the famine were sent humanitarian aid, Ukraine was systematically denied such assistance. Also, the famine was accompanied by a devastating purge of the Ukrainian intelligentsia and the Ukrainian Communist party itself. One document is an order from Moscow to shoot people who steal food. It is signed by Stalin in red ink. According to Professor Donald Rayfield, within a year 6,000 had been executed and tens of thousands imprisoned.

Most modern scholars agree that the famine was caused by the policies of the government of the Soviet Union under Stalin, rather than by natural reasons. The Holodomor is sometimes referred to as the Ukrainian Genocide, implying that the Holodomor was engineered by the Soviets, specifically targeting the Ukrainian people to destroy the Ukrainian nation as a political factor and social entity. While historians continue to disagree whether the policies that led to Holodomor fall under the legal definition of genocide, twenty six countries have officially recognized the Holodomor as such. On 28 November 2006 the Ukrainian Parliament approved a bill, according to which the Soviet-era forced famine was an act of genocide against the Ukrainian people.


Shortly before, during and immediately after World War II, Stalin conducted a series of deportations on a huge scale which profoundly affected the ethnic map of the Soviet Union. It is estimated that between 1941 and 1949 nearly 3.3 million were deported to Siberia and the Central Asian republics.


Find a new hero.


By the way, capitalism and a free market get shit done. End of story.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Sta ... portations
TV antenna tip

If you have “cut the cord” and use a TV antenna to[…]

How to become an EU citizen

:roll: You're wrong. I just provided a source that[…]

Jeffrey Epstein's private banker at Deutsche &[…]

Thanks for the above post Skinster! :up: Sh[…]