[stephen50right]

The Final Case for Donald Trump

Article from stephen50right

Donald Trump is so superior to Hillary Clinton as a potential President of the United States, that it should not be debatable. Trump would be an excellent president, with the possibility of being a great president. While Hillary assuredly would be a disaster, an absolute catastrophe to our country. We don't need Nostradamus to foresee what would happen over the next four years under each administration.

Under Hillary Clinton, the negativity would be never ending. She is by reputation a very nasty person. She seems to enjoy being condescending and talking down to people as if she is better than all of us. In her warped leftist mind, she really does believe that she is a superior being, illustrated by her own contemptible behavior over many years.

Leftist politicians usually if not always think of themselves as the elite of society. The supreme rulers over subservient subjects who they wish to control for their own amusement and self-aggrandizement. Hillary fits that description to a tee.

Her involvement with scandals and corruption is by far the worst in modern US political history. Nobody else, including Richard Nixon, comes remotely close. There is no doubt that Hillary believes that she is above the law. All of this would become markedly worse under her presidency.

If she is elected, the chances of her sooner or later getting impeached, probably sooner, is virtually certain. Nothing of significance could possibly be accomplished in her administration, with congress constantly focused on investigating her non-stop criminal activities. Our country would languish with stagnant growth, continued debt, and societal decline even if Hillary was not a criminal, because she is so incompetent.

Unfortunately for America under a Hillary Clinton regime, the world would not stand still as our country declines and stays embroiled in political turmoil. Our enemies will grow stronger as we get weaker, and they will become emboldened. Possibly to a point of thinking they could defeat us in a war. Either that or bullying a weak, feckless Hillary into capitulation to what they want.

Hillary Clinton as president would place America in a dangerous predicament, perhaps deadly. She really is nothing but bad news for our country. Now for some good news. We can elect Donald Trump.

To the naysayers out there who bash Trump for his caustic remarks. Let's repudiate those accusing him of saying profane things which supposedly upsets children. A child can watch any new sitcom on TV, especially cable TV, and hear all sorts of vulgar wisecracks, far worse than anything Trump says.

Children are now proficient on computers at an early age. This is also the era of the internet. Dirty language and pictures are just a mouse click away. So unless a boy or girl has been kept in a cage, they have already seen and heard it all before. Thankfully they usually don't understand yet what it means.

Then there are comments that Trump occasionally makes about women. Always in jest and meant to be humorous, sometimes in a biting way to express a point towards his opponents. These same sort of comments are made by most men, but normally in private. The infamous audio of Trump's comments recently released from eleven years ago, for which he was excoriated, in all fairness was simply private banter between men.

Women as well sometimes make crude comments about men in their private chat sessions with each other, and they of course know that. So let's stop with the silly criticisms about Trump in this regard. Those adults most offended by Trump's remarks, could be the ones most guilty of doing the exact same thing.

Anyone who wishes to be naive and think that presidents shouldn't act this way, should understand the reality of a treacherous world. We should want a president who occasionally uses rough words to make a strong point. A president has to send troops into combat when necessary to kill the enemy. We need a president with hard bark who can make tough decisions, not some thin-skinned liberal such as Hillary Clinton.

Donald Trump is actually a perfect gentleman nearly all of the time. His opponents know this is true, but of course they won't admit it. Trump doesn't have a sexist, racist, bigoted, homophobic, etc, bone in his entire body and that has been proven over his whole life. He would have never been able to build a remarkable business in this day and age, if what his opponents call him was true.

Donald Trump is a winner and a leader, and that is not debatable. Our country needs this right now in a big way with all the disconcerting problems that our country faces. Trump will do what's best for “We the People” and not cater to special interests which Hillary Clinton has always favored.

Would rich people benefit from a Trump presidency? Yes they will and they should. Rich people are often job creators. The middle class and poor people will benefit from Trump as well with greater ability to make good money which means increased prosperity for all.

Trump will be a president for all the people. For an America that was founded on opportunity and advancement, while maintaining freedom and liberty. What Trump offers is basically impossible if Hillary is in charge, because she doesn't believe in capitalism or certain parts of our constitution.

Make no mistake, Hillary Clinton is a hard core socialist. She believes in a Democratic Party owned and operated nanny state, with her as the boss, as a Queen of America. Hillary would consider it a compliment to be called Queen Hillary, and if she gains enough power, she may insist on it.

Hopefully on November 8th, the majority of the electorate will just say no to Hillary Clinton. But that doesn't mean voting for Trump is just voting anti-Hillary. Voting for Trump is a vote for a dynamic financial future, and a safe and secure country for yourself, family and friends, and all of our fellow Americans. We are all in this great country together, and with the leadership of Donald Trump, he can bring us together for a common goal of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

[LV-GUCCI-PRADA-FLEX]

The final case for Donald Trump should be a coffin.

[Blondie]

With some of these new posters I get the feeling that they're here due to a school assignments. This reads like a 9th grade civics paper.

[The Immortal Goon]

If I read something with this tone and construction from one of my students, I'd immediately try to figure out how to tell him or her an F was in the immediate future.

A good political operative would try to conflate feeling with fact in order to fool the general tide of the electorate. Every political party and system on the planet does this.

But this reads as an essay from one of the people that has been fooled and has no firm grip on why he feels the way he does. But he does, damnit!

[Stormsmith]

Too bad the writer supplied zero documentation for his or her opinion

[AmericanNationalist]

The great thing right now about this election is that the time for words is nearing its end. The era of action is near.

[stephen50right]

If I read something with this tone and construction from one of my students, I'd immediately try to figure out how to tell him or her an F was in the immediate future.

A good political operative would try to conflate feeling with fact in order to fool the general tide of the electorate. Every political party and system on the planet does this.

But this reads as an essay from one of the people that has been fooled and has no firm grip on why he feels the way he does. But he does, damnit!

Wherever you work, and whatever amount they are paying you, it's too much. Even if it's one penny per year, they should ask for their money back.

Liberals like you are pure frauds. If I would have written the exact same article and inserted "Hillary Clinton" instead, with info pertaining to her, you would give the article an A+. You know it, and we all know it, so stop acting as though you are the William Shakespeare of the literary world.

[stephen50right]

Too bad the writer supplied zero documentation for his or her opinion

It is an article, not a dissertation, not a book. Stop acting silly.

The article is based in commonly known fact, it doesn't need documentation. Yes, from that fact I expressed my viewpoint.

Considering the obvious "Karl Marx" idolization in your signature line, it appears that you do not wish to acknowledge commonly known facts that you disagree with, which is a brain malfunction prevalent among leftists.

[stephen50right]

The great thing right now about this election is that the time for words is nearing its end. The era of action is near.

This one I will agree with.

[Albert]

If I read something with this tone and construction from one of my students, I'd immediately try to figure out how to tell him or her an F was in the immediate future.

A good political operative would try to conflate feeling with fact in order to fool the general tide of the electorate. Every political party and system on the planet does this.

But this reads as an essay from one of the people that has been fooled and has no firm grip on why he feels the way he does. But he does, damnit!

All the social ills of our society are a fault of older white man like yourself. You have forsaken sons of your nation, you have given our women to migrants and hoping they will replace you when you die. Yet your sons you have thrown to the curb!

[quetzalcoatl]

The great thing right now about this election is that the time for words is nearing its end. The era of action is near.

The inaction of a cautious man is always superior to the action of a precipitous fool. But you're right that we have reached a tipping point of sorts. We now have a critical mass of people willing to chuck two and a half centuries of republican rule right out. This cannot end well.

[Donna]

Does the republic even still exist? lol

#justglobalismthings

[quetzalcoatl]

If you want it enough, yes. By "you" I mean the citizenry at large. The republic was always about having some limitation on the exercise of power, and a decent respect for the institutions intended to make peaceful coexistence with your neighbors a possibility.

Now we have half the population wanting to lock up the other half. So, maybe a republic is not in our future.

[stephen50right]

If you want it enough, yes. By "you" I mean the citizenry at large. The republic was always about having some limitation on the exercise of power, and a decent respect for the institutions intended to make peaceful coexistence with your neighbors a possibility.

Now we have half the population wanting to lock up the other half. So, maybe a republic is not in our future.

Believe it or not, I think our Founding Fathers would still be happy with the way political discourse occurs today. Don't forget, politics was rough back in the late 18th century as well.

We are still using ballots instead of bullets to decide our political leaders, which is exactly how our Founding Fathers wanted it to be.

Although with the massive corruption of Hillary Clinton and her leftist friends, I think they would be getting a little bit nervous about that, but not panicking...yet.

[LV-GUCCI-PRADA-FLEX]

They would be incredibly pissed that a black person is running the country. They would also be shocked that half of the voting public would trust a woman to run the country. They would also be extremely confused as to why we let the blacks, poors, and womens vote.

[The Immortal Goon]

Liberals like you are pure frauds. If I would have written the exact same article and inserted "Hillary Clinton" instead, with info pertaining to her, you would give the article an A+. You know it, and we all know it, so stop acting as though you are the William Shakespeare of the literary world.

Not a liberal. Did not vote for Hillary Clinton. Just noticed that your essay sucked.

All the social ills of our society are a fault of older white man like yourself. You have forsaken sons of your nation, you have given our women to migrants and hoping they will replace you when you die. Yet your sons you have thrown to the curb

One of the problems in attempting to racialize Irish European racist identity with American racist comes down to the acceptance of the one-drop rule.

In short, because Europeans did not have mass African slavery (they did not have mass plantations due to climate and did not like the look of it in the way contemporary Americans don't like child labour)--and Americans did.

In the most pure sense, the Irish identity is fluid: the standard republicanism accepted view is a universal pan-movement developed by an American named DeVoy that made a Cuban named DeValera as the all but accepted father of the Irish state; stemming from an internationalist movement that regarded Indians and atheists as equal members at a time when Europeans regarded Irishmen as religious zealots and radicals; this inclusive view stemming from the the Kilkenny confederation that was one of all Irish groups including British, French, and Spanish, royalists identifying as a part of the Irish nation; itself an expansion upon the French Normans famously becoming, "More Irish than the Irish;" stemming out of the Viking identity that before 1066 made Ireland the capital of an international Atlantic identity so far away as Afghanistan; and before that well into ancient identity by Ireland's most ancient identity as an island stemming from a book of invasions.

But I guess an Eastern European that is obsessed with being a victim is crying and kneeling at my feet. He is worried that we members of the Irish diaspora continue a long tradition of fucking a lot and cuckolding people like him.

I'm not sorry your lame English conception of white-ism is so lame that half a millennium later you suck so bad at sex that you have to try to incorporate our success in cuckolding and bedding the sweetest tang to a "white" identity that you can try to claim from your virginity.

Nope, the sons of my diaspora (like me) have satisfied every type of woman on Earth until those women claim our identity and swear p allegiance to our small nation. Our women have browbeaten any in-Irish man that has questioned the integrity of ancient Erin.

I'm not sorry that your men are cuckolded by Irishmen and your women's mouths race to the cock of our diaspora.

But really: trying to claim that the Irish, of all people on Earth, have forgotten petty nationalism throughout our proliferation of every continent and into space, is to ignore reality and our splitting of your women's legs until they cry for our country.

It's a cliche at this point. I doubt you could find another diaspora so obsessed with the motherland.

[QatzelOk]

It should not be debatable.
Trump would be an excellent president
Hillary assuredly would be a disaster
We don't need Nostradamus
There is no doubt

Nothing of significance could possibly be accomplished in her administration
Our enemies will grow stronger as we get weaker, and they will become emboldened. Possibly to a point of thinking they could defeat us in a war.

To the naysayers out there who bash Trump...

the reality of a treacherous world.
the reality of a treacherous world.
the reality of a treacherous world.
(repeat 3x)

(spoken)
We should want a president who occasionally uses rough words to make a strong point. A president has to send troops into combat when necessary to kill the enemy. We need a president with hard bark

Donald Trump is a winner and a leader, and that is not debatable.
Our country needs this right now in a big way
Rich people are often job creators.
What Trump offers is basically impossible if Hillary is in charge, because she doesn't believe in capitalism or certain parts of our constitution.

I think this could work, but you'll need some charming projects-to-riches story to make it resonate with a large audience.

[Stormsmith]

It is an article, not a dissertation, not a book. Stop acting silly.

The article is based in commonly known fact, it doesn't need documentation. Yes, from that fact I expressed my viewpoint.

Considering the obvious "Karl Marx" idolization in your signature line, it appears that you do not wish to acknowledge commonly known facts that you disagree with, which is a brain malfunction prevalent among leftists.

When you write:

Make no mistake, Hillary Clinton is a hard core socialist.

you aren't writing a well known fact, you're giving us your opinion and using it as a premise. These require documentation

I'm not a Marxist.

[garrulousunlawful]

With some of these new posters I get the feeling that they're here due to a school assignments. This reads like a 9th grade civics paper.

would you like to tell us how many languages you have mastered?
Probably English-(the convoluted american version) English and Antipedian. am I right?

Im personally fluent in 3 and am learning da forth, yea I know da is wrong and forth means forward, but just for the hell of it.

soma these people are debating here in a foreign language to them. Respect is due.
I like to see soma you lot in a German forum like, that'd be laugh innit?

by the way, I aint slaggin you off, im just hoping to make you see a point

[garrulousunlawful]

All the social ills of our society are a fault of older white man like yourself. You have forsaken sons of your nation, you have given our women to migrants and hoping they will replace you when you die. Yet your sons you have thrown to the curb!

Albert really, Im lost for words when I read some of your comments,
you make racist remarks like this, you hate cultural diversity, but you want to go and live in the country that has invented the concept of Globalisation and is striving towards it evermore.... you are so incoherent you are like hot air.
I am mixed race, you know what gets you, you know deep inside that im like hybrid and a damn side better than you at everyfuckinthing.

Believe it or not, I think our Founding Fathers would still be happy with the way political discourse occurs today. Don't forget, politics was rough back in the late 18th century as well.

We are still using ballots instead of bullets to decide our political leaders, which is exactly how our Founding Fathers wanted it to be.

Dont you think the media goes out of its way to make sure it narrows down your choice to two candidates that are pretty much the same, bought and paid for by the oligarch and megafirms?
Do you know how incredibly rich some of your past politicians have become?