- 02 Dec 2016 18:44
#14744791
If that's your definition of "liberal democracy", then it should be opposed in all of its forms.
Society needs to be governed by virtue, not the wants and whines of the mob and the morally degenerate things they idolize in substitute of having any higher power.
There's no "right" to have one's perversions catered to by the state, regardless of what they're permitted to do in their bedrooms or not; the state should play an active role in discouraging perverse behavior, not rewarding it.
Pants-of-dog wrote:
Again, this is not a rebuttal to anything I have said.
I think it is clear that you have no logical rebuttal to my claims about liberal democracy.
If that's your definition of "liberal democracy", then it should be opposed in all of its forms.
Society needs to be governed by virtue, not the wants and whines of the mob and the morally degenerate things they idolize in substitute of having any higher power.
There's no "right" to have one's perversions catered to by the state, regardless of what they're permitted to do in their bedrooms or not; the state should play an active role in discouraging perverse behavior, not rewarding it.
He understands that Death, when we have finished the part that was assigned to us, is the reward of Love. And he apprehends the truth that the greatest happiness ever granted to a man is the privilege of being happy in the hour of his death.