- 11 Jul 2017 09:14
#14822314
I do not see why you conclude from this that there is no collusion.
No proof means nothing. There are plenty of indications of collusion.
Ingliz is adamant to undermine any critique of the massive immigration of Muslims into Europe and any critique about Islam.
I wonder why?
ingliz wrote:In an interview with La Repubblica newspaper, 28 April 2017, Zuccaro admitted he has “no proofs” of the allegations.
I do not see why you conclude from this that there is no collusion.
No proof means nothing. There are plenty of indications of collusion.
Ingliz is adamant to undermine any critique of the massive immigration of Muslims into Europe and any critique about Islam.
I wonder why?