Donna wrote:Nah. There is no way Cuba would have achieved Canada's level of development had it remained in the American sphere of influence. What really unleashes the forces of modernization and development is a combination of strong government, abundant geography and scaled exploitation (a lot of logistics, a lot of land and a lot of bodies), conditions which existed in America and Canada but not in Cuba.
The idea that poor countries just need better political management is one that is largely ignorant of the complexities of global capitalism and the different strengths in political structures under different stages of social development. With that said, there is a massive track record of failure in opening up formerly colonized nations to the global system, whether they emerge from situations with weak or chaotic government or the dissolution of stagnant interventionist experiments. The result is always a sensitively tuned catastrophe for people in those societies.
I am not interested in what could have or would have happened but rather in what did happen. The point was, it is not so much what "they have achieved" since the revolution, but rather what "they managed to keep". Cuba does not build any sort of medical equipment. No MRIs are built in Cuba, No planes, No cars. Construction projects in the island are limited and skewed towards tourism. The repair of the "Old Havana" was tourism-driven, the goverment wanted to showcase the colonial buildings so that tourists would come (even then the work was sloppy and very limited to few areas). A lot of the equipment is legacy ancient shit from USSR times, smuggled or donated in very small quantities. This idea of "medical powerhouse" that some people want to spearhead is frankly ridiculous.