Robust Apprenticeship Program Key To Germany's Manufacturing Might - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

All general discussion about politics that doesn't belong in any of the other forums.

Moderator: PoFo Political Circus Mods

#14876980
Robust Apprenticeship Program Key To Germany's Manufacturing Might
https://www.npr.org/2018/01/04/57511457 ... ring-might

Manufacturing accounts for nearly a quarter of Germany's economy. In the U.S., it's about half that. A key element of that success is Germany's apprenticeship training program.

Every year, about half a million young Germans enter the workforce through these programs. They provide a steady stream of highly qualified industrial workers that helps Germany maintain a reputation for producing top-quality products.

Henrik Tillmann is among the current crop of young apprentices. The 19-year-old is training at Hebmuller Aerospace to be an industrial clerk, which qualifies him to do a variety of jobs from materials purchasing to marketing. Each week he spends three-and-a-half days at the company's production center, and a day and a half at a government-funded school. Before he can become a clerk, though, Tillmann must first learn how to build the valves Hebmuller sells to aerospace companies.

He will be a better clerk, says his boss, Axel Hebmuller, because he'll know the valves inside out when he describes them for customers.

"I think it's much easier for young people to understand what they're doing, what they're learning, when they get a little practical work with it because then they can see what they learn at school," he says.

Hebmuller, a co-founder of this firm located near Dusseldorf, says small companies like his rely on apprentices. In fact, that's how he started his career: He was an apprentice at the local bank. "This is where I got my economy degrees," Hebmuller says.

He later went to university, too. But Hebmuller says only 3 of the 16 people who work for his company went to university.

"Even in some of the big, big companies in Germany, in the upper management levels you have people who only have an apprentice and don't even have any university degree," he says.

Apprenticeships are one of the foundations of Germany's manufacturing strength, and Felix Rauner, a professor at the University of Bremen, says U.S. presidents have taken notice.

"Every president of the United States [in] the last 30 years, after becoming elected, said, 'Oh, we should implement the apprenticeship system'," says Rauner.

Donald Trump is no exception.

Last June, at the White House, Trump signed an executive order aimed at boosting the number of U.S. apprenticeships by nearly tenfold to 5 million. But, experts doubt the goal will be realized because funding is inadequate.

Rauner, one of the world's leading authorities on apprenticeships and vocational education, says historically, the U.S. approach to vocational education has been ineffective partly because it's often not directly connected to specific jobs at real companies.

Also, says Rauner, U.S. society has stigmatized vocational education, so most American parents see college as the only path to status and a good career for their children. Rauner says there's a troubling trend in that direction in Germany, too. But, in Germany there's still lots of prestige attached when someone, trained through apprenticeship, achieves master status.

"If, for example, someone gets a meister title, it would be published in the local newspaper and there's a huge celebration. It is an important event," Rauner says. "No one in Germany is interested if someone gets a master degree in a university."

Ludger Deitmer, Rauner's colleague at the University of Bremen, says his son is an example of the benefits of an apprentice system.

"He started as an engineer, but after four semesters he gave it up and said no this is not really what I want," Deitmer says.

His son is now a tradesman who prefers to learn things by doing them and enjoys looking back after a hard days work and seeing what he has accomplished.

Deitmer is international research coordinator at the Institute of Technology and Education at the University of Bremen and has also studied apprenticeships extensively. He suggests the failure of the U.S. to widely provide this kind of training has hurt U.S. manufacturing, something President Trump says he wants to remedy.

"Vocational training should be one of the medicines, the key medicines, in how to make America great again," Deitmer says. "Why not? This is exactly what the country needs."

One barrier to apprenticeships in the U.S. is getting American companies to buy in, because of the cost of training. In Germany, a firm trains the apprentice and pays them a modest wage.

"But in the second year, they're already doing 60 percent of the workload of a fully skilled worker," Deitmer says. "So, there is a return."

Cheap apprentice labor reduces the net training cost to the company to a little over $10,000, Deitmer says. And, the real pay-off for companies, he says, is that after three years they've got a highly-skilled worker.

U.S. firms often complain about a lack of skilled workers, but the U.S. has struggled to create widespread apprentice programs. Felix Rauner says growing a viable American apprenticeship system will be difficult. Partly because the U.S. has historically had a barrier between schools and business, and partly because of the fractured nature of U.S. education, with 50 states in charge.

This kind of vocational education is precisely what a number of countries need to implement in education reform, certainly in America, certainly if we're going to be great again and produce worthwhile jobs.
#14877042
It isn't just a vocational/apprenticeship system. That would be entirely the wrong lesson to draw from the German experiment.

It's an apprenticeship system embedded in a strong union/manufacturing partnership stewarded by German governments; Germans have remained committed to this partnership, regardless of party in power.

It's a de-natured form of Strasserism, in effect, minus the fascist bombast. It wouldn't be feasible in the US, with its ideological aversion to both central planning and strong unions. Vocational education, btw, is worthless unless it's in the form of apprenticeship directly sponsored by the relevant union/manufacturer partnership (depending on the industry). That is, it has to be an actual and dedicated pipeline to real jobs.

The remnants of such a program still exists in the US among building trade crafts and machinists. I was fortunate to graduate from such a program in its heyday, and was able to retire with a nice pension to supplement SS. So yeah, it does work. But FDR and LBJ are long gone here, and the US continues its dystopian decline into free-market orthodoxy.
#14877119
Zagadka wrote:This kind of vocational education is precisely what a number of countries need to implement in education reform, certainly in America, certainly if we're going to be great again and produce worthwhile jobs.


You would have to do away with the empire first. It's a variant of the "Dutch disease," in which productive labor is depreciated because it's so much easier to live by usury.

The dual apprenticeship system has its basis in a tradition of craftsmanship going back to the Middle Ages. Its other offspring are the so-called Hidden Champions, which are typically family-owned highly innovative SMEs, which are grounded in their region while being international leaders in their field. Germany shares these traditions with its neighbors, especially in Austria, Switzerland, the Czech Republic, Belgium, etc.
#14877141
Atlantis wrote:You would have to do away with the empire first. It's a variant of the "Dutch disease," in which productive labor is depreciated because it's so much easier to live by usury.

The Greeks have discovered this, to their chagrin. For them it is not the Dutch disease, it's the Deutsche Bank disease.
#14877181
quetzalcoatl wrote:It's a de-natured form of Strasserism, in effect, minus the fascist bombast. It wouldn't be feasible in the US, with its ideological aversion to both central planning and strong unions.

It's neo-corporatism actually.
Wikipedia wrote:Neo-corporatism

During the post-World War II reconstruction period in Europe, corporatism was favoured by Christian democrats (often under the influence of Catholic social teaching), national conservatives, and social democrats in opposition to liberal capitalism. This type of corporatism became unfashionable but revived again in the 1960s and 1970s as "neo-corporatism" in response to the new economic threat of recession-inflation.

Neo-corporatism favoured economic tripartism which involved strong labour unions, employers' unions, and governments that cooperated as "social partners" to negotiate and manage a national economy. Social corporatist systems instituted in Europe after World War II include the ordoliberal system of the social market economy in Germany, the social partnership in Ireland, the polder model in the Netherlands (although arguably the polder model already was present at the end of the First World War, it was not until after WW II that a social service system gained foothold there), the concertation system in Italy, the Rhine model in Switzerland and the Benelux countries, and the Nordic model in Scandinavia.

Attempts in the United States to create neo-corporatist capital-labor arrangements were unsuccessfully advocated by Gary Hart and Michael Dukakis in the 1980s. Robert Reich as U.S. Secretary of Labor during the Clinton administration promoted neo-corporatist reforms.
#14877532
Kaiserschmarrn wrote:Austria has the most corporatist system with very influential national employer/employee organisations. It's not to be recommended as something entirely positive. Germany's system is more flexible as far as I know.


I have to admit I'm not as knowledgeable about European labor as I am with the American system. However, the word "flexible" is a red-alarm warning. Labor flexibility is the neoliberal concept of choice in describing tearing down labor protections - just as entitlement reform is the neoliberal reframing of cutting social spending.
#14877541
quetzalcoatl wrote:
I have to admit I'm not as knowledgeable about European labor as I am with the American system. However, the word "flexible" is a red-alarm warning. Labor flexibility is the neoliberal concept of choice in describing tearing down labor protections - just as entitlement reform is the neoliberal reframing of cutting social spending.

From your perspective, the German system is probably more neoliberal. Employers can opt out of collective bargaining at industry level in Germany whereas in Austria they cannot.

http://www.worker-participation.eu/National-Industrial-Relations/Countries/Germany/Collective-Bargaining
http://www.worker-participation.eu/National-Industrial-Relations/Countries/Austria/Collective-Bargaining

Some examples: https://twitter.com/OnlinePalEng/s[…]

Russia-Ukraine War 2022

I do not have your life Godstud. I am never going[…]

He's a parasite

Trump Derangement Syndrome lives. :O