[skinster]

If that's all your evidence for Russia being responsible, I can see why this continues to be emotional for you.

[anarchist23]

:lol:
If that's all your evidence for Russia being responsible, I can see why this continues to be emotional for you.

Emotional?
If you mean laughing at you, then yes.
Are you sure you're not suffering from PMT?
The bottom line is that you can't tell me why those two Russians were in Salisbury on the day of the attack, and the day before. Can you?


[center-img]http://i64.tinypic.com/213n0gj.jpg[/center-img]

[skinster]

Yes, I can tell you that I don't know why Russians were in, apparently Russians-free Salisbury-town around the same day as the Skripal poisoning, but I'm not so gullible to trust Theresa May's claims where she equated that as proof that RUSSIA DID IT.

Because I learned many years ago not to trust the government's warmongering on evidence-free info.

anarchist, you are a joke. And using my PMT joke at Rancid yesterday against me is noted. Get your own material.

[Rancid]

:lol:

If that's all your evidence for Russia being responsible, I can see why this continues to be emotional for you.

They are guilty just on account of being Russian. This is an open and shut case.

[Rancid]

PMT joke at Rancid yesterday

[skinster]

You know when I asked you if you were getting your period, bab, when you were taking a debate in TLTE very serial.

They are guilty just on account of being Russian. This is an open and shut case.

Seems so.

[Rancid]

You know when I asked you if you were getting your period, bab,.....

Sexist.

[skinster]

Sexy*

[anarchist23]

Re: UK has no proof of Russia’s role in Skripal poisoning.
There obviously is, as two Russian operatives can't give a reasonable explanation of what they were doing in Salisbury on the day of the attack and the day before.
In fact no one on this thread can. Don't hold you breath. lol

[center-img]http://i67.tinypic.com/1402rk.jpg[/center-img]

[skinster]

There is no evidence they were Russian "operatives" or that they poisoned the Skripals. Repeating the same thing is making you sound like Tony Blair when he kept harping on about WMDs in Iraq that didn't exist.

[anarchist23]

Craig Murray thinks those two Russians were just tourists because their cock and bull story of the bad weather was plausible. Give us a break.
They had return tickets for two consecutive days and a host of other irregularities. lol
The two suspects refused to show their passports on the RT interview. Why?

[Rancid]

On a more serious note. People are often convicted on circumstantial evidence.

[anarchist23]

On a more serious note. People are often convicted on circumstantial evidence.

More you analyse the interview the more you realise it's bullshit.
Also
The two suspects refused to elaborate on what their occupation was and how they made a living on the RT interview. Why?
If they were cross examined in a court of law and they hedged every question that the prosecutor asked them as they did in the RT interview the jury would find them guilty.
You just have to laugh.

[center-img]http://i68.tinypic.com/zir6o8.jpg[/center-img]

[Drlee]

The two Russians are not gay. Neither of them part their hair.

The Russians did this. No doubt about it. It is fun to see the usual barracks lawyers trying to defend them.

I will not go to Salisbury Cathedral. It does have a Medieval Graffiti tour which costs £12.50 but I really don't want to see it. I did not think that they even had gangs in Medieval England. Not to mention hoes and thugs.

[B0ycey]

Re: UK has no proof of Russia’s role in Skripal poisoning.
There obviously is, as two Russian operatives can't give a reasonable explanation of what they were doing in Salisbury on the day of the attack and the day before.
In fact no one on this thread can. Don't hold you breath. lol

This is simply not true Anarchist. I can give you an explanation why the could have been there. To visit a Cathedral. I suspect there are many people daily who do travel many miles to visit a site for a couple of days. Why not these two?

Whether you accept that explanation or even consider it plausible is another question altogether. Although Skinster is correct. It is up to you to provide the evidence that Russia are guilty in this case and not for Skinster to prove they are innocent. After all, without incident there is no evidence.

[SpecialOlympian]

It is unfortunate that they will never have a third attempt to make their way through the labyrinthine streets of Pox-On-Butthole to see the famous cathedral, renowned the world over, simply because Theresa May has an inexplicable boner for ejecting Russian diplomats from her country.

Who could possibly navigate their way through the many tourist traps of famed Wipestaine's glitzy tourist district to the Anglican Mecca of its cathedral without being distracted once, twice, maybe even a third time? Renowned the world over for being the #1 destination for international businessmen, what with its pleasant weather and the allure of its red light district.

[anarchist23]

anarchist23 wrote:

Re: UK has no proof of Russia’s role in Skripal poisoning.
There obviously is, as two Russian operatives can't give a reasonable explanation of what they were doing in Salisbury on the day of the attack and the day before.
In fact no one on this thread can. Don't hold you breath. lol

B0ycey wrote:

This is simply not true Anarchist. I can give you an explanation why the could have been there. To visit a Cathedral. I suspect there are many people daily who do travel many miles to visit a site for a couple of days. Why not these two?

Whether you accept that explanation or even consider it plausible is another question altogether. Although Skinster is correct. It is up to you to provide the evidence that Russia are guilty in this case and not for Skinster to prove they are innocent. After all, without incident there is no evidence.

I'm asking for a reasonable explanation with some proof...



[center-img]http://i67.tinypic.com/mv5c8y.jpg[/center-img]

[B0ycey]

I'm asking for a reasonable explanation with some proof...

Why is it not reasonable to visit a cathedral? The proof, they were is Salisbury.

Although I have already suggested they are likely the culprits by the fact they have Novichok in their hotel room. Where we seem to have a lack of evidence is their links to Putin. That is what I ask you to provide please to back up your memes.

[anarchist23]

Why is it not reasonable to visit a cathedral? The proof, they were is Salisbury.

They have video cameras at Salisbury Cathedral. Could you show me some video evidence of the Russian Clowns being at the Cathedral, for starters.

[ingliz]

Novichok in their hotel room

Doubtful.

On May 4 tests were carried out in the hotel room where the suspects had stayed which showed contamination of Novichok.

However the levels were below that which would cause concern for public health.

Further tests on the room produced negative results.

Also it is odd that, when all previous samples were sent for technical analysis to the OPCW, there is no information from the OPCW concerning the tests from the hotel room.


* My emphasis.