Why are many Americans still homophobic? - Page 2 - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

All general discussion about politics that doesn't belong in any of the other forums.

Moderator: PoFo Political Circus Mods

#14919424
Straight people can do that. At the same time we can admit that it doesn't appeal to us, personally. We can understand it, however, because humans are normally capable of understanding love, and human interaction.

Now... go back to your lesbian porn, @Zamuel , you alien. ;)
#14919431
Godstud wrote:Straight people can do that. At the same time we can admit that it doesn't appeal to us, personally. We can understand it, however, because humans are normally capable of understanding love, and human interaction.

Sorry bub, I guess you're gay too … you just havn't found the closet door yet.

Now... go back to your lesbian porn,

Yuk, no thank you. Lesbian porn is about as interesting as watching Bees pollinate.

Zam
#14919432
I continue to believe that most homosexuals are secretly malicious and narcissistic. For example, the majority support mass Muslim immigration, even though this will deny future homosexuals the privileges they have been able to modernly enjoy. But if you're already pegging another man until he bleeds for your pleasure and pretending the whole time that you just want to get married... I think most of them are suffering from psychological issues that are too thorough to fix. I also believe that if you actually research homosexual culture, learning about things like tops, bottoms, bug chasers and the high frequency of childhood sexual abuse, this becomes undeniable. I know that I personally leaned towards accepting homosexuality until I started learning more about them.

I also think there's a democratic fallacy wherein, if it's an interest group, you must accept it. This error is one reason why I don't believe that democracy is going to continue working on its current scale throughout the internet age; not every cognizable group is worth courting. If you disagree with me on this, consider the current liberal push to let criminals vote or Salon's infamous attempts to normalize pedophilia. They essentially believe that openly anti-social groups deserve a voice. Acceptance of homosexuality is one of the first manifestations of this mistake.
Last edited by Hong Wu on 31 May 2018 02:10, edited 2 times in total.
#14919433
Victoribus Spolia wrote:Why don't we just generalize an entire nation's views on homosexuality on the basis of a single incident of crime that was allegedly motivated due to prejudice.

which is a pretty fucking gay thing to do.

@anarchist23,

;)


It is not generalizing if you use the word "many". Many is a vague word and is not all-encompassing. ;)

Many in America are very homophobic.

One time a proud mama was showing a photo of her son to a group of co-workers and she said loudly, "This is my son and his gay partner!" You know what, the room went dead silent for several heartbeats that you could hear a pin drop and this was a sizable lunch room. It's amazing that people would just react in shock to a pronouncement like that. The son has someone in his life, shouldn't matter what his sexual orientation is.
#14919434
Zamuel wrote:Sorry bub, I guess you're gay too … you just havn't found the closet door yet.
I guess I just have more humanity and imagination than you're capable of. :D

Zamuel wrote:Lesbian porn is about as interesting as watching Bees pollinate.
Now I know you're gay! :lol:

Hong Wu wrote:I continue to believe that most homosexuals are secretly malicious and narcissistic.
You've obviously never met one in your small short life, that is chock full of ignorance. You're homophobic.
#14919435
Godstud wrote:You've obviously never met one in your small short life, that is chock full of ignorance. You're homophobic.

I'm actually in my mid-30's, had more than one gay room mate and researched homosexuality while in law school at the request of my professors, who later flipped the table when I told them what kinds of things the community actually does. I understand that most people want to pretend that everyone is well intentioned, it's just easier that way... but like I said, it's close to jumping the shark.
#14919437
Hong Wu wrote:one gay room mate and researched homosexuality while in law school
Right... the "college experience". ;) You're one of those homosexuals who is still in the closet and lashing out at others because you secretly hate yourself. I get it.

If you did understand homosexuality, you wouldn't say such stupid things about it, or about homosexuals. Sorry, but your comments are ignorant, and spiteful. There's a lot of hate you have for homosexuals and it comes out in what you say. Don't hate yourself.
Last edited by Godstud on 31 May 2018 02:19, edited 1 time in total.
#14919438
@Hong Wu is missing out! You must have a gay bestie, they're just so kind and fun to be around.

Edit: Not every gay person is pretentious and fake. There are always good people out there among the garbage.

Seriously, some of the most openminded people I meet have been gay or borderline gay, not that there can't be awesome straight people. I have noticed that a lot of the artists are gay like fashion designers, makeup artists, entertainers in theatre and film and so on and many of them I don't realize they're gay until someone tells me or I read about it. Because I only see their talent and how inspired they are. They're beautiful people inside and out.
#14919441
Hong Wu wrote:I continue to believe that most homosexuals are secretly malicious and narcissistic.

I'd agree, but also note that many "straight's are equally malicious and narcissistic.

I think most of them are suffering from psychological issues that are too thorough to fix
.
Again, I'd agree, especially if by "fix" you mean "turn them straight." Phycological issues are common to all human beings. Growing up, inherently "Gay" from birth, is bound to cause more than a few.

Zam 8)
#14919442
Yeah, there are definitely heterosexual people who basically live in a manner similar to most homosexuals and I believe that they actually possess many of the same psychological problems. It might even be the case that you take a certain kind of person, add some child sexual abuse and now you have a homosexual but who knows; many of the old psychological theories of homosexuality have been rejected in the aftermath of the sexual revolution. After the culture accepted anti-social heterosexual behavior, the acceptance of homosexuality was probably inevitable.

As unfortunate as all this can be, I believe one issue with giving homosexuals a voice in democracy is that they will support subtly harmful and self-destructive policies. This is essentially what a "bottom" and a "bug chaser" are, people who have come to fetishize their own suffering. Case in point, the fact that most gays in Europe want to bring in Muslims who openly intend to toss them off rooftops some day in the future. The "tops" probably think this future scenario is not their individual problem and are amused to imagine this being done to future homosexuals; the "bottoms" and "bug chasers" are probably fascinated by the prospect of being murdered.
#14919443
Godstud wrote:I guess I just have more humanity and imagination than you're capable of. :D

Actually that's often a predominant gay characteristic.

Now I know you're gay! :lol:

No, sorry, Man on Man and Woman on Woman are just dynamics I can't even imagine. I can appreciate beautiful females, but gay sexual activity does not arouse me.

Zam 8)
#14919445
Zamuel wrote:Actually that's often a predominant gay characteristic.
Keep telling yourself that, if it makes you feel better. :D

Homosexuality is no worse than heteros that dress up as furries, or engage in BDSM. They do it in their homes, and we don't have to partake of their adult interests. Homophobes are strangely curious in homosexual sex, as is evidenced by @Hong Wu diatribe on homosexual sexual preferences, and activities... :hmm:

Strangely a little TOO curious.
#14919448
Godstud wrote:Keep telling yourself that, if it makes you feel better. :D

Homosexuality is no worse than heteros that dress up as furries, or engage in BDSM. They do it in their homes, and we don't have to partake of their adult interests. Homophobes are strangely curious in homosexual sex, as is evidenced by @Hong Wu diatribe on homosexual sexual preferences, and activities... :hmm:

Strangely a little TOO curious.

You're literally praising ignorance and defending homosexuality by calling people gay.
#14919450
I don't praise ignorance. I mock it.

Everything you say on this topic, aside from your peculiar interest in gay sex) is based in ignorance, and emotion. You hate because they're different, and not due to any reasonable and rational reason. You make idiot generalizations, because you base everything on your feelings, and not any facts.

I will defend people's freedom to choose who they love, whoever it may be. It doesn't harm me, or others, and it doesn't harm society. It's a personal choice, just like it is when you choose 'Doggie style' over 'Missionary style' when having sex. If you want to dress up as a french maid while your girlfriend puts on a strap-on... power to ya, if that's what makes you happy. You're both consenting adults.
#14919451
Godstud wrote:Keep telling yourself that, if it makes you feel better. :D

Why would your advanced sensitivities make me feel better?

Homosexuality is no worse than heteros that dress up as furries, or engage in BDSM

Why are you judgmental? Consensual activities, whether homo or hetro are not "Better or Worse."

You may be approaching mental blocks that affect your behavior. Warning signs are lighting up.

Zam :eh:
Last edited by Zamuel on 31 May 2018 03:18, edited 1 time in total.
#14919453
Taking a piss, Zammy. No need to get all uptight. :lol:

Zamuel wrote:Consensual activities, whether homo or hetro are not "Better or Worse."
I am very much well aware of this. Others are not.
#14919454
Godstud wrote: I am very much well aware of this. Others are not.

Ok … you seem conflicted, not unusual when on such a personal subject. Approach this area of consciousness calmly and avoid it if it becomes disturbing. Our bodies age, but our minds never stop learning.

Zam
#14919459
Hong Wu wrote:So, blacks can call other black people whatever they want because they're both black.
Yes, because when they call each other names, they aren't being racist. The same would apply to two white people calling each other names. Racism isn't going to be a factor. Why is this so hard for you to understand?

Hong Wu wrote:If liberals can call people gay as an insult because they're liberals, does this mean that liberals are gay?
If you consider being called gay an insult, then you are the one with the problem. I'd don't get all twisted up and angry inside, because it really doesn't affect me . You do, because you are homophobic, @Hong Wu.

Isn't oil and electricity bought and sold like ev[…]

@Potemkin I heard this song in the Plaza Grande […]

Russia-Ukraine War 2022

The "Russian empire" story line is inve[…]

I (still) have a dream

Even with those millions though. I will not be ab[…]