If the Iraq War was wrong, why didn't Europe and Canada and the rest of the world stop it? - Page 3 - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

All general discussion about politics that doesn't belong in any of the other forums.

Moderator: PoFo Political Circus Mods

#15004662
The pathetic fantasy world of the leftie and their new alt right friends. I support Assad, although I was very much a Jonny come lately to the Assad cause. But there was and is massive opposition to Assad from young trendy secular, often-atheist progressive types to the extremes of ISIS and every shade of Sunni Islam in between. The Kurds don't want him, even many Alawites and Christians wanted to see the back of him. The Assad regime is corrupt, inefficient, brutal and repressive.

In this pathetic fantasy world, conflicts must fall neatly into 2 utterly different categories, either foreign invasions with an innocent occupied and an evil invader or hermetic civil wars with no outside interference. Yes there are many foreign fighters, yes there are foreign forces involved, yes there are foreign weapon supplies, but so what? What civil was hasn't had outside intervention? Perhaps the 3rd Anglo American civil war of 1861 -1865. But note the US only won its independence with massive support from the Netherlands and absolutist France and Spain. Was the Spanish Civil War not a civil war because there was extensive outside intervention? And on the other hand how often has there been an invasion without significant numbers of people in the invaded land looking to collaborate?

https://youtu.be/zKwZH8MvPj8?si=pR50awzGXEk26OHX […]

Again, this is not some sort of weird therapy w[…]

Indictments have occured in Arizona over the fake […]

Ukraine already has cruise missiles (Storm Shadow)[…]