Protest against Israel - National Rally Sat 3rd - Page 2 - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Talking about and organise marches, demonstrations, writing to your local Member of Parliament etc.

Moderator: PoFo Political Circus Mods

User avatar
By War Angel
#1741339
Bounce Widdit, if you're so supportive of the Arab cause, why don't you fight for it, for real? Not stupid, pointless demonstrations thousands of kilometers away, but REAL assistance - right here, where it all happens.

What say you?
By Bounce Widdit
#1741345
What on earth are you harping on about? What is the "arab cause"?

whatever it is, its not the reason i'll be demonstrating
User avatar
By War Angel
#1741349
* An immediate end to Israel's military assault on Gaza
* An immediate end to the blockade and siege on Gaza
* An end to Israel's violations of international law
* An end to Israeli occupation

Is this is not what you support\want? Why aren't you doing anything REAL about it, then?

Come here and fight with the Palestinian Arabs. End Israel. Don't run about, dance and whistle - stand behind what you believe in, and fight.
User avatar
By War Angel
#1741370
You wrote 'end Israel's occupation', and I assume that like the Palestinian, you mean all land occupied by Israel.

Now, stop evading - whatcha gonna 'bout it any of this?

You're not very good at this are you?

Hello, mister newbie-who-just-came-here-and-starts-lecturing-an-Israeli-who's-been-here-for-years! Got any other gems for us, love?
By Bounce Widdit
#1741377
You wrote 'end Israel's occupation', and I assume that like the Palestinian, you mean all land occupied by Israel.


no, at the top of my first post i said this was from Palestinian Solidarity Campaign.

second, end Israel's occupation does not equate with end Israel - in the same way ending a US occupation of Iraq does not mean an end to the US itself

elsewhere on this forum, i advocate a one state solution to the palestine-israel conflict which is entirely consistent my protest

third, you whole accusation rests on a self-conscious assumption - an accusation i earlier claimed was wrong, and at your behest, have now demonstrated is wrong

on the basis of this three part folly, i re-assert: you are not very good at this, are you?
User avatar
By Noelnada
#1741380
Now, stop evading - whatcha gonna 'bout it any of this?


Well, you know we aren't going to do much about it, except remembering our governments that they have to be more tough and impartial on the matter. Maybe that if Israeli begin to take the international opinion in considerations, they will begin to take another approach to solve the conflict as well.

One good thing to start with, would be for the Israel government to recognize it was wrong to reject the democratic outcome of the last Palestinian elections.

In the meanwhile, we will boycott your kösher products, ha wait, we didn't buy any already :|
User avatar
By War Angel
#1741410
second, end Israel's occupation does not equate with end Israel - in the same way ending a US occupation of Iraq does not mean an end to the US itself

Where is Iraq, and where's the USA? 'End the Israeli occupation' means, no more Israeli presence in the Middle East - and since there's no Israel else-where in the world, it essentially means 'end Israel'. The Palestinians get it, we get it - why can't you?

elsewhere on this forum, i advocate a one state solution to the palestine-israel conflict which is entirely consistent my protest

With an Arab, Muslim majority - again, no more Israel.

third, you whole accusation rests on a self-conscious assumption - an accusation i earlier claimed was wrong, and at your behest, have now demonstrated is wrong

You have demonstrated nothing but your use of baffling syntax for no apparent reason.

on the basis of this three part folly, i re-assert: you are not very good at this, are you?

I'm the absolute worst, but you still haven't said why you're not doing anything of substance to further your cause, instead of silly demonstrations. Wanna end our occupation? Come here and try.

In the meanwhile, we will boycott your kösher products, ha wait, we didn't buy any already

Oh, wonderful - you've brought religion into this. What's 'kosher', exactly, about Intel's micro-chips? It's not even food...
User avatar
By Noelnada
#1741420
Oh, wonderful - you've brought religion into this. What's 'kosher', exactly, about Intel's micro-chips? It's not even food...


We can't boycott microchips as far as i know, it's not really an Israeli product anyway...
And i boycott Kösher pizzas if i want, has nothing to do with religion, rather with taste :p
By Bounce Widdit
#1741439
I'm the absolute worst, but you still haven't said why you're not doing anything of substance to further your cause, instead of silly demonstrations. Wanna end our occupation? Come here and try.


in my opinion, demonstration is an act of substance...

as for your other points,

first, there is widespread opposition to 'israeli occupation' as it is commonly known without an end to the 'israeli state'... it is what both a two state and one state solution is predicated on....

your second point can logically hold true only if israel is, by definition, a state for jewish people alone, or at least in majority. if it is, your problem with the one state solution is purely one of definition; hell of a reason to oppose it

third point, how can you deny your assumption wasn't wrong... you assumed i wanted an end to israel, i asserted that i did not. and yet your assumption still stands true? is there any point in even arguing with you if it amounts to you saying something, sticking your fingers in your ears, and going 'blah blah blah'?

your whole beef with me rests on whether i want an end to israel. seeing as i don't, your accusations and demands of 'an answer' (which i have given you now anyway, not that it will shut you up) are irrelevant
User avatar
By War Angel
#1741581
in my opinion, demonstration is an act of substance...

Meh. Just kids havin' a ball.

your second point can logically hold true only if israel is, by definition, a state for jewish people alone, or at least in majority. if it is, your problem with the one state solution is purely one of definition; hell of a reason to oppose it

Well, obviously, if 'Israel' is not 'Israel', then... well, it's just another Arab country, one of over two dozens, and my people still have no home. So, yeah, an end to Israel still. Saying 'one country for two peoples' is the same as saying 'No country for the Jewish people'.

first, there is widespread opposition to 'israeli occupation' as it is commonly known without an end to the 'israeli state'

Not on the Palestinian side, no. They want everything, and rightfully so, in their eyes. They don't want us here.

hird point, how can you deny your assumption wasn't wrong... you assumed i wanted an end to israel, i asserted that i did not. and yet your assumption still stands true? is there any point in even arguing with you if it amounts to you saying something, sticking your fingers in your ears, and going 'blah blah blah'?

I am fully familiar with all the rhetorics surrounding this matter. "I don't hate Jews, I just don't think they should have a state", "I'm not against a Jewish state, I just think they need to share it with twice\three times as many Arabs", etc etc... all mean, essentially, the same thing. Dance around it all you like.

your whole beef with me rests on whether i want an end to israel.

I've no beef with you. You do not interest me. I do, however, have some reservation against people who support my enemy, who wishes to exterminate me. Still, as long as it's not active support ('aid', money transactions, coming here to fight, etc), I don't care. It doesn't cost lives.

seeing as i don't, your accusations and demands of 'an answer' (which i have given you now anyway, not that it will shut you up) are irrelevant

I just wanted to know why you haven't considered coming here to assist your Palestinian buddies... something which I've still received no answer to. No matter, though... if you're European, I wouldn't really expect you to do much of anything, except bitch an' moan.
User avatar
By Red Rebel
#1741823
Dave wrote:It doesn't concern my country. We're involved only because jews are politically influential here. None the less, I remain baffled by Westerners who obsess over this. Our people are not involved.


Depends on who you associate yourself with. If you are a nationalist and associate youself as *insert your country here* it probably doesn't affect you unless your in the Middle East. If associate yourself as a Jew/Muslim your probably opinionated on the subject. Myself I assoicate with my class; therefore, I am affected when a couple hundred Israelis and Palestinians die because their leaders can't fucking share.
User avatar
By Dave
#1741852
Like I said, I'm not a jew or arab. I associate myself with my tribe, which is the default position of humanity. You associate yourself with an ephemeral "class", which accounts for your bizarre emotions on this subject and explains why you are a subversive and potential traitor to your nation.
User avatar
By redcarpet
#1741984
Even though I'm a UK citizen and member of the Stop the War Coalition and Pal. Sol. grp I would refuse to go to these demos if in the UK. Gordon Brown is not a democrat. New Labout is very autocratic; they ALREADY KNOW Israels' occupation is opposed by most Western populations. That's WHY the official position is that Israel must withdraw to the pre-1967 border & Tel Aviv is Israel's capital.

Gordon Brown isn't exactly going to cut off aid to Israel in response to street demos.You're wasting time.
Last edited by redcarpet on 02 Jan 2009 00:45, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By War Angel
#1742273
therefore, I am affected when a couple hundred Israelis and Palestinians die because their leaders can't fucking share.

Our leaders? We elected them, they work for us. WE are the ones who have to deal with whatever happens, so we're the ones making the shots.

That's WHY the official position is that Israel must withdraw to the pre-1967 border & Tel Aviv is Israel's capital.

Oh? Whose 'official position' is that?
User avatar
By Sephardi
#1742550
How stupid can people be that they dont realize when they send money to Palestinians, Hamas gets it, and puts it into making bombs. Something I also realize, and everybody probably knew this already, Pofo has the most people against Israel and the most Communists out of all other websites.
User avatar
By redcarpet
#1743120
Pofo has the most people against Israel and the most Communists out of all other websites


Oh I wouldn't say that. More like Left & Right are even in numbers here but the Lefties post more topics and replies than the Righties.
User avatar
By Nets
#1743384
That's WHY the official position is that Israel must withdraw to the pre-1967 border


It's a nit-picky point, but technically the 1949 lines aren't a border, the Arabs insisted in the 49 arminstice agreements that the cease fire lines in those agreements in no way constituted legal borders. I support an agreement more or less along the 49 lines, but I get annoyed when they are called borders, the Arab states had a chance to make those the borders and they adamantly refused.
User avatar
By redcarpet
#1743475
those agreements in no way constituted legal borders


US resolutions passed since the 67 war make them legal & binding borders. The UN SC is the highest legal body, alongside the ICJ. Israel is obliged to withdraw to the pre-67 borders as succeeding resolutions specify.
User avatar
By Dave
#1743478
Who cares about the UN?
Israel-Palestinian War 2023

If the actual claims are being ignored and we are […]

Russia-Ukraine War 2022

Of course the US has a problem with it's dick siz[…]

The English are identifiable genetically. Of cou[…]