- 31 Aug 2015 12:48
#14595244
Hi,
I was talking to a friend about the Iran nuclear deal, and, as a libertarian, I've been largely in support of it. The main argument I have a hard time addressing because I don't have the most knowledge about it is that this deal's bad because "Iran is one of the largest sponsors of terrorism." What's the verity of this claim?
Also, he gave me this article (http://www.adl.org/israel-international ... tters.html) which I found especially troubling because, while it's a pro-Isreal sight, it seems to straight up deny all of the research I've done on the topic so far. For instance, it says that the IAEA suggests that Iran has been diverting resources to creating a weapon. This is curious, because with all the research that I've done, all the nuclear experts and the IAEA seem to be suggesting that there's no indication of Iran even attempting to build a nuke since over a decade ago. Thoughts?
I was talking to a friend about the Iran nuclear deal, and, as a libertarian, I've been largely in support of it. The main argument I have a hard time addressing because I don't have the most knowledge about it is that this deal's bad because "Iran is one of the largest sponsors of terrorism." What's the verity of this claim?
Also, he gave me this article (http://www.adl.org/israel-international ... tters.html) which I found especially troubling because, while it's a pro-Isreal sight, it seems to straight up deny all of the research I've done on the topic so far. For instance, it says that the IAEA suggests that Iran has been diverting resources to creating a weapon. This is curious, because with all the research that I've done, all the nuclear experts and the IAEA seem to be suggesting that there's no indication of Iran even attempting to build a nuke since over a decade ago. Thoughts?