[dominque]

Instead of dropping bombs throughout the middle east the US in conjunction with NATO would have been better off dropping,all types Music, Pornography,,cell phones, TV's & entertain centers, Videos computers, satellite everything, Cigarettes, Alcohol, Marijuana , Strippers, Prostitutes, sport cars, Fashion,is there any reason to believe teenagers are any different anywhere in the world,especially males including 20m30,40,50&60 yr old and yes old codgers , any thing missing is opportunity,available,in short order things would change, It would take a genius to figure out -This is EVIL? where do I sign up? and the how who movement would be underway. Yes there would deaths, examples made of,but in the end this would be worth dying for instead gatting on my knees five times day and masturbating in a closet somewhere. Not would here be clamoring to get more, we would be building Hugh customer based that's virtually untapped by the masses in the middle east. Retaliation would be what,another futile attempt to blow up something, we have some many eyes on the ground it would be virtually impossible to keep any thing a secret. OK short list to head of the dept Gary Hart, Bill Clinton, ect and few hot bables to distract the existing rulers. There absolutely no way this doesn't work ,just keep it coming and ignoring the vive patrol,churches,and republicans TRILLIONS made and saved

[Baff]

I think the bombs are probably cheaper.

Usually we try flagrant bribery long before we have got to the bombing stage.

[SteveDaPirate]

I'm inclined to agree with Baff here, the usual problem solving strategy for the U.S. is something along the lines of:
1. Throw money at the problem.
2. Throw more money at the problem.
3. Twist some arms.
4. Twist some arms while throwing money at the problem.
5. Threaten violence for non-compliance, while dangling money as the prize for cooperation.
6. Engage in said violence while throwing money at contractors

While I would prefer to see the U.S. woo the populations of the middle east rather than invade, the effectiveness of this strategy presumes that the general population has a say in forming foreign policy in these places.

[Locke II]

I'm inclined to agree with Baff here, the usual problem solving strategy for the U.S. is something along the lines of:
1. Throw money at the problem.
2. Throw more money at the problem.
3. Twist some arms.
4. Twist some arms while throwing money at the problem.
5. Threaten violence for non-compliance, while dangling money as the prize for cooperation.
6. Engage in said violence while throwing money at contractors

While I would prefer to see the U.S. woo the populations of the middle east rather than invade, the effectiveness of this strategy presumes that the general population has a say in forming foreign policy in these places.

7. Throw money at some nonexistent problem and engage violence with said problem

[Locke II]

I'm inclined to agree with Baff here, the usual problem solving strategy for the U.S. is something along the lines of:
1. Throw money at the problem.
2. Throw more money at the problem.
3. Twist some arms.
4. Twist some arms while throwing money at the problem.
5. Threaten violence for non-compliance, while dangling money as the prize for cooperation.
6. Engage in said violence while throwing money at contractors

While I would prefer to see the U.S. woo the populations of the middle east rather than invade, the effectiveness of this strategy presumes that the general population has a say in forming foreign policy in these places.

7. Throw money at some nonexistent problem and engage violence with said problem

[Elect G-Max]

Unfortunately, the porn-bombing strategy doesn't work. If it did, the Mormon church would have imploded decades ago.

[Imperial Spaghetti]

Unfortunately, the porn-bombing strategy doesn't work. If it did, the Mormon church would have imploded decades ago.

I think the bombs are probably cheaper.

Usually we try flagrant bribery long before we have got to the bombing stage.

I agree