How would you describe your foreign policy philosophy? - Page 5 - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Ongoing wars and conflict resolution, international agreements or lack thereof. Nationhood, secessionist movements, national 'home' government versus internationalist trends and globalisation.

Moderator: PoFo Political Circus Mods

Forum rules: No one line posts please.
#14915701
Dave wrote:Realpolitik

[1] The purpose of our foreign policy should simply be to maximize our security, power, and wealth.

[2] The USA has pursued a foreign policy directly opposite of those aims since the mid-1930s.

[3] As I've grown older I've become very skeptical of military aggression, as even if our assaults on foreign countries were carried out in the national interest (they're not) the theoretical benefits are almost never worth the cost.


Allow me some remarks:

[1] all these purposes are in some kind compulsory for a government of a free state. It is worth to note that those can only be achieved by carefully balancing them in a international concert.

[2] if your posit was accurate, USA would be a very poor country with little influence. Quite the opposite is reality.
Nevertheless, there are more people in misery than in other developed countries.
But that is a consequence of internal politics and not a lack of successful foreign policy.

[3] That is very true.
Dress rehearsal for war is usually armed diplomacy that equals blackmail, and often is a fertilizer for devastating conflicts to come.

Greets hartmut
#15029951
mikema63 wrote:What foreign policy philosophy do you subscribe to and how would you describe it?


I support an agricultural cooperative based upon the NAFTA charter with room at the table for Central American countries. I think that the pursuance of regional manufacturing chains is essential to the well-being of the United States as is an infrastructure that can facilitate the transition and offset of petroleum based plastic and timber products to those that are based in cellulose from crops such as corn and hemp. I also support intervention in Venezuela and increasing trade and infrastructure agreements with countries in the Western Hemisphere.

I am also of the belief that the US dollar as a reserve currency is on borrowed time and once this arrangement is over there will neither be the economic luxury nor the demand for US presence in the Middle East or Asia. As it is this nation has spent trillions of dollars over there in the past 30+ years and doesn't have much to show for it.
Antifa again demonstrates its undemocratic nature

A serious question, @SSDR: would you see an "[…]

EU-BREXIT

Very well, what about the other similar claims in[…]

It is hard to believe that the Yemeni rebel group […]

Election 2020

Of course, a good economy and cutting red tape ar[…]