Suntzu wrote:The will always be White folks who will breed with Negroes. Hell, American Black are a product of this interbreeding which explains why American Blacks have an average I.Q. of 85 versus a sub-Saharan African of 70.
American blacks = negroes even though a lot of white people raped black women and made them carry the child to term. It would be a lot easier for whites to deny this reality if it weren't a well-known fact that Thomas Jefferson did this a LOT. And the girl who he did this with started having his kids at 14! A child molestor! This is one of the people that everyone looks up to in this country and he was a rapist, slave-owning, child-molester.
Anyway my point is a lot of rape was done and black people have a huge admixture with white people if they are from here. Does that mean that they are a distinct race from "Negroes"? Are they a new race called Negroes distinct from Africans? Or does black really just refer to a specific, culturally-significant property that has been constructed over time to describe a historical condition?
The point is that the genetic component will always be derived from the cultural component. We use a very specific, arbitrary data point in order to justify hundreds of years of prejudice, dehumanization, exploitation, and subjugation. Not just towards blacks but towards everybody. We call this white supremacy, white nationalism, whatever. But it's not genetics.